Liberal comedian Bill Maher slammed the U.S. medical establishment for being “afraid” to admit that it was wrong for promoting transgender procedures for minors.

Maher made the remarks on his HBO show “Real Time” on Friday while discussing a recent landmark study published in March in the U.K. by Dr. Hillary Cass that concluded that minors should not be given transgender treatments. Later that month, England’s National Health Service (NHS) permanently banned giving puberty blockers to minors.

Maher said that the U.K. and other countries in Europe were so far ahead of the U.S. in dealing with the issue of transgenderism in minors that the U.S.’ policies are now considered to be obsolete.

“This is so symbolic of so much of woke excess — by thinking you’re so progressive, you’re actually behind,” he said.

Maher then read what Cass wrote: “The reality is that we have no good evidence on the long-term outcomes or interventions to manage gender related distress in kids. These are kids who wanted to switch sex. For most young people, a medical pathway will not be the best way. There’s no clear evidence that social transition in childhood has any positive or negative mental health outcomes. And the ideology on all sides has directed care.”

“So in other words, by trying to be so far ahead, United States — and this is not just England, this is all the Scandinavian countries, they’ve all pulled back on this,” Maher commented. “To me, this says a lot about where we went and hopefully we’re getting back to someplace sane, because yes, I don’t think we should doing medical interventions on kids before they can figure out who they are.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP

WATCH: Bill Maher on the new study about the problems associated with doctors transing kids: “I don’t think we should be doing medical interventions on kids before they can figure out who they are.”

Maher: “This is so, to me, symbolic of so much of woke excess, by thinking… pic.twitter.com/isbc4yzEXW

— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) May 18, 2024

Experts are warning that President Joe Biden’s latest plan for the Middle East could spark a nuclear arms race in the region among Islamic nations.

The details were contained in a New York Times report about the administration’s attempts to revive a deal that would normalize ties between Israel and Saudi Arabia, which collapsed after Hamas’ October 7 terrorist attack.

The administration wants Israel to reward the Palestinian people for the unprecedented terrorist attack from Hamas, a terrorist group that they elected to run Gaza, by agreeing to give them their own official state.

Saudi Arabia has informed the Biden administration that it wants a U.S.-Saudi mutual defense pact, which would counter the threat it faces from the Islamic Republic of Iran, and it wants “cooperation on a civilian nuclear program with uranium enrichment in the kingdom, the sale of advanced American-made weapons and, potentially, a trade deal.”

Israel is opposed to the deal because its government and people overwhelmingly oppose giving Palestinians their own state as experts warn that it will turn into a haven for Islamic terrorists.

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud, also known as MBS, has indicated that a nuclear program for the country is his most important priority and that if Iran develops nuclear weapons then his country will, too.

Andrea Stricker, Deputy Director & Research Fellow at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies’ Nonproliferation & Biodefense Program, said that the deal “guarantees a regional nuclear arms race.”

“The Biden administration is playing with fire if they open a door to or assist the Saudis with uranium enrichment,” she told The Daily Wire in a statement. “This would upend decades of American policy to prevent the spread of the means to make nuclear weapons.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP

“Congress must immediately pass a law making bilateral nuclear cooperation contingent on Riyadh ruling out enrichment and plutonium reprocessing and signing an enhanced IAEA inspection agreement, the Additional Protocol,” she added. “Otherwise, Biden and Sullivan will have left not Middle East peace as a legacy, but a new trigger for nuclear arms-racing.”

Rebeccah Heinrichs, senior fellow at Hudson Institute and the director of its Keystone Defense Initiative, slammed the Biden administration’s “mismanagement” of America’s relationship with Saudi Arabia, calling it “one of the biggest fumbles of the Biden’s foreign policy.”

“The U.S. and [Kingdom of Saudi Arabia] KSA have shared interests in countering Iran’s goal of Middle East hegemony and destroying Iranian terrorist proxies,” she said. “But KSA will inch closer to a nuclear weapon to the extent the U.S. permits Iran’s power to grow while restricting Gulf partners and allies in their effort to counter it. It’s in the interest of the U.S. to uphold nonproliferation goals but in its focus on resurrecting the Iran nuclear deal, team Biden may be courting disaster by initiating the groundwork for a Saudi one.”