NewsGuard Runs Cover For Terrorists In ‘Fact-Check’ Of Ben Shapiro

The media monitoring company that issues “trust scores” to news outlets says it still doesn’t have enough information to conclude that terrorists are to blame for the deadly blast at a Gaza hospital — although all available evidence has led U.S. intelligence to declare with “high confidence” that this is the case.

In a Thursday email to The Daily Wire, a NewsGuard senior analyst called into question commentary by Daily Wire Editor Emeritus Ben Shapiro pinning the blame on Palestinian terrorists.

“There have been enough conflicting accounts that, in NewsGuard’s view, we still don’t know enough to pin the blame definitively on [Palestinian Islamic Jihad],” wrote Valerie Pavilonis of NewsGuard, which has received nearly a million dollars from the federal government for its services.

At the time of her email, U.S. intelligence officials had already gone public with their assessment that the hospital blast was the result of a Palestinian rocket. Based on analysis of four different video feeds as well as the effect of the blast, it was determined with “high confidence” that the rocket came from inside Gaza and was fired by Palestinian militants.

A video analysis published by the Washington Post on Thursday confirmed that “fighters in Gaza launched a barrage of rockets toward Israel and in the direction of al-Ahli Hospital 44 seconds before” the explosion.

These findings are consistent with Shapiro’s statements made on the October 18 episode of “The Ben Shapiro Show” that NewsGuard is taking issue with. The only evidence to the contrary has been supplied from the Palestinian militant groups themselves, which stated that more than 500 people were killed from an Israeli air strike — claims that have been proven to be false.

“Naturally, when a hospital allegedly blew up in the Gaza Strip yesterday afternoon, and Hamas immediately claimed that the explosion was an Israeli airstrike and that 500 people had been killed, the media used their heads,” Shapiro said. “They decided to wait for all the information to emerge because, you know, Hamas are liars. Nah, just kidding. They went with Hamas’ report because this is what they do. As it turned out, Hamas was, as usual, lying, lying from beginning to end. A failed Palestinian Islamic Jihad rocket hit the hospital.”

U.S. intelligence officials say that “catastrophic motor failure” is likely to blame for the misfire of the terrorist rocket that hit the hospital grounds.

“There was a catastrophic motor failure that likely occurred, which separated the motor and the warhead,” an official told media outlets. “The warhead landed in the hospital compound and that was the second explosion and a much bigger one.”

That assessment based on video footage from the night of the blast is confirmed by scenes from the aftermath, according to the official, who said there would have been “large craters and broader blast effects” if the explosion was caused by Israeli munitions. In reality, there was only “light structural damage,” consistent with what would have been caused by a misfired terrorist projectile.

Media outlets that blamed Israel based on claims from Gaza’s Ministry of Health, which is controlled by Hamas, were forced to backtrack their initial claims about the blast. The New York Times admits it relied “too heavily” on unverified information from terrorists in its reporting.

NewsGuard, a for-profit organization, says its mission is to provide “transparent tools to counter misinformation for readers.” It says it hires “trained journalists” to “rate and review” outlets based on apolitical assessments of facts. It gives news outlets each a “trust score” ranging from 0-100.

It is unclear whether NewsGuard will negatively rate outlets that blamed Israel for the explosion. Pavilonis, the NewsGuard analyst, did not respond to a request for comment on its reluctance to pin blame for the attack on Palestinian terrorists.

Asked about NewsGuard’s attempt to fact-check his coverage of the hospital explosion, Shapiro called the inquiry a “mockery.”

“Leave it to a perverse mockery of fact checking to mimic Hamas’ propaganda about lack of clarity surrounding the Palestinian Islamic Jihad hospital attack, despite literally all evidence to the contrary,” Shapiro told The Daily Wire. “With fact-checking like this, who needs disinformation?”

Critics have called into question just how trustworthy NewsGuard’s assessments are. Independent journalist Michael Shellenberger, who interviewed the company’s co-CEOs, points out that the media monitor improperly downgraded outlets that reported on the possibility that COVID-19 escaped from a Chinese lab, a theory that is now widely believed to be the most plausible explanation for its origin.

A Washington, D.C., news outlet sued NewsGuard this week, charging that the media monitor is “engaged in a pattern and practice of labeling, stigmatizing and defaming American media organizations that oppose or dissent from American foreign and defense policy,” pointing to a $750,000 payment from the U.S. Department of Defense as a conflict of interest.

After publication of this article, NewsGuard’s General Manager Matt Skibinski said the company has not downgraded any outlet for stating that terrorists caused the explosion.

“NewsGuard is not treating reports or statements asserting that an IPJ rocket caused the hospital explosion as examples of false, misleading, or irresponsibly reported statements that would contribute to a site failing our criteria; no publisher’s score has been downgraded as a result of such claims,” Skibinski said in an email. “For news outlets that reported with certainty that Israel was behind the explosion based on initial reports, we are looking carefully at what each outlet reported and when, how much certainty they conveyed, and whether any initial inaccurate claims were quickly and prominently corrected as new facts about the incident came to light.”

Biden Defense Department’s Nuclear Weapons Management Presents Major Risk, Per Gov Accountability Office

The Department of Defense’s (DOD) current nuclear weapons management presents a major risk to national security, per the latest Government Accountability Office (GAO) report.

The GAO report, published on Thursday, found that the DOD has failed to resolve many oversight issues since 2021. The GAO — Congress’ auditing, evaluation, and investigative arm — also noted that problematic discontinuity in nuclear oversight structure began in the final week of the Trump administration.

“DOD has significantly modified its nuclear enterprise oversight structure multiple times since 2021, putting oversight continuity at risk and potentially affecting senior leaders’ ability to make informed decisions,” stated the GAO.

It was on January 14, 2021, six days before President Joe Biden took office, that Acting Secretary of Defense Chris Miller replaced the Nuclear Deterrent Enterprise Review Group (NDERG), which had addressed issues from nuclear enterprise reviews since 2014, with another group: the Secretary of Defense Nuclear Transition Review (SNTR). DOD then replaced the SNTR with another group last year: the Deputy’s Management Action Group (DMAG).

In an August 2021 report on SNTR, the GAO expressed concern that the group lacked specific roles and responsibilities, as well as procedures for internal and external communications.

Out of GAO’s three recommendations at the time, DOD has only implemented one: providing guidance to ensure the progress toward or completion of 2014 nuclear enterprise review recommendations. 

In a related January 2022 report, the GAO issued four additional recommendations concerning DOD coordination with the Department of Energy (DOE), the agency responsible for the nuclear weapons modernization and infrastructure. None of these recommendations have been met.

In its latest report, the GAO again urged the DOD to take up its unmet recommendations over the years: to clarify roles and responsibilities of oversight organizations; establish methods of communication and collaboration among oversight organizations; prioritize programs, projects, and activities within the nuclear enterprise; and monitor issues affecting the nuclear enterprise.

DOD’s oversight issues were identified as part of GAO’s review of the DOD’s nuclear triad modernization efforts. The nuclear triad are the land, sea, and air nuclear weapons that make up the nation’s deterrence system, all of which are decades past their planned service life.

The DOD estimates that modernization of the nuclear defense systems would cost about $350 billion over the next 20 years.

The land leg, intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), currently consists of Minuteman III, a system nearly 50 years past its planned service life. The Minuteman III system is scheduled to be replaced by the Sentinel missile system in 2030.

The sea leg, ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs), currently consists of the Ohio-class submarines originally designed in the 1970s to last 30 years. The DOD extended those SSBNs’ service life to 42 years, and is scheduled to replace them with the Columbia-class SSBNs beginning in 2027.

The GAO issued a report in January on the Columbia-class SSNBs with six recommendations on conducting a schedule risk analysis. None of these recommendations have been met.

The air leg, bomber planes, currently consists of the B-52 and B-2 bombers, the former in operation since the 1950s and the latter in operation since the 1990s. The B-52 bombers are anticipated to last through the 2050s with modifications — though the GAO stressed greater urgency in accomplishing modernization — while the B-2 bombers are scheduled to be replaced by the B-21 bombers sometime within the next few years.

About Us

Virtus (virtue, valor, excellence, courage, character, and worth)

Vincit (conquers, triumphs, and wins)