Famed film director William Friedkin, who won an Oscar for “The French Connection” and directed such exceptional films as “The Exorcist,” “Rules of Engagement,” and “Sorcerer,” has died at the age of 87.

Born in Chicago in 1935, Friedkin’s parents were Jewish emigrants from Ukraine who fled with his grandparents after a violent anti-Semitic pogrom in 1903. After graduating from high school at 16 (Friedkin admitted he was not a good student), he started working in the mail room at WGN-TV.

At 18, he was directing live television shows and documentaries, including “The People vs. Paul Crump,” which won an award at the San Francisco International Film Festival.

Friedkin directed one of the last episodes of “The Alfred Hitchcock Hour” titled “Off Season” in 1965. He moved to Hollywood in 1965 and started his career directing feature films with “Good Times,” starring Sonny and Cher.

After directing several other films, Friedkin broke out with “The French Connection” in 1971. It won five Oscars, including Best Picture, Best Director for Friedkin, and Best Actor for Gene Hackman.

Friedkin spoke of how Costa-Gavras’ film “Z” influenced how he made “The French Connection”:

After I saw “Z,” I realized how I could shoot The French Connection. Because he shot “Z” like a documentary. It was a fiction film but it was made like it was actually happening, like the camera didn’t know what was gonna happen next. And that is an induced technique. It looks like he happened upon the scene and captured what was going on as you do in a documentary. My first films were documentaries, too. So I understood what he was doing but I never thought you could do that in a feature at that time until I saw “Z.”

Two years later, Friedkin directed “The Exorcist,” which won 10 Oscar nominations, including Best Picture and Best Director, winning for Best Screenplay and Best Sound.

Friedkin later directed 1977’s “Sorcerer,” which he considered his best film. Films like “The Brink’s Job” and “Cruising,” followed before he had a heart attack in 1981.

In 1985, Friedkin’s “To Live and Die in LA” was released and praised by critics; in 1995 he directed one of his favorite films, “Jade.” In 2000, he directed “Rules of Engagement,” starring Tommy Lee Jones and Samuel Jackson — an astonishingly conservative film considering it came out of Hollywood — regarding the U.S. military.

Among his favorite films, Friedkin said he liked “Alien,” “Blade Runner,” and “Bullitt,” and said he truly respected Steve McQueen as an actor, saying he was a very “underrated but sensational American film actor.”

Friedkin was married four times; to actress Jeanne Moreau, actress Lesley Anne-Down, news anchor Kelly Lange, and finally former Paramount Pictures head Sherry Lansing, to whom he was married at the time of his death.

Within hours of Donald Trump requesting a stripped-down protective order — narrower than one sought by prosecutors in the federal 2020 election criminal case against the former president — special counsel Jack Smith rejected the revised proposal, leading to a quick decision by the presiding judge to order a hearing.

An eight-page reply from Smith’s team argued the court should stick with the government’s broader array of suggested rules to stem the disclosure of evidence for the trial rather than consider the limiting tweaks offered by Trump, who has pleaded not guilty to charges over an alleged effort to overturn the results of the last presidential contest. The filing recites quotes from Trump’s defense counsel in various TV appearances claiming Smith’s proposed rules would suppress helpful information from making its way to the press.

“The central purpose of criminal discovery is to provide the defendant with materials necessary to prepare for a fair trial. To facilitate the efficient production of discovery to the defense, the Government proposed a reasonable protective order consistent with current practice in this District,” Smith team said.

“The defendant instead proposed an order designed to allow him to try this case in the media rather than in the courtroom. To safeguard witness privacy and the integrity of these proceedings, the Court should enter the Government’s proposed protective order,” the reply added.

Trump’s lawyers filed their response to Smith’s proposed order just before the deadline at 5 p.m. ET after U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is based in Washington, D.C., denied their request for an extension over the weekend.

The Trump legal team asked that the government’s the proposed order be narrowed to “shield only genuinely sensitive materials from public view” or else their client may be restricted from discussing non-sensitive, potentially exculpatory evidence and could be precluded from seeking the help of “volunteer attorneys” or others “without paid employment arrangements.”

Trump’s lawyers also warned that the government seeks to restrict Trump’s First Amendment rights in a case about First Amendment rights and claimed that President Joe Biden has already “capitalized” on the indictment, pointing to a re-election campaign social media post showing him drinking from a “Dark Brandon” coffee mug hours before Trump was arraigned. Like Biden, Trump is running a 2024 campaign for another term in the White House.

Prosecutors filed the request for a protective order last week, explaining that “much” of the evidence they planned to share with Trump’s legal team contained “sensitive and confidential information” and the disclosure of grand jury transcripts or other information “could have a harmful chilling effect on witnesses or adversely affect the fair administration of justice in this case.”

Smith’s team raised concerns about Trump’s posts to social media regarding “witnesses, judges, attorneys, and others associated with legal matters pending against him,” and said if the former president “were to begin issuing public posts using details — or, for example, grand jury transcripts — obtained in discovery here, it could have a harmful chilling effect on witnesses or adversely affect the fair administration of justice in this case.” Prosecutors specifically made reference to a post Trump made to his Truth Social account on Friday, writing in all capital letters, “If you go after me, I’m coming after you!”

In their filing on Monday, Trump’s legal team requested a hearing on the matter so that the “parties may fully discuss each redline, in sequence, and address any concerns the Court may have.” The response from Smith’s team argued, “No oral argument is necessary,” and concluded that the court “should enter the Government’s proposed protective order.”

“The Government has proposed a standard, reasonable order that will streamline the flow of discovery to the defendant while preserving the integrity of these proceedings,” Smith’s team said. “The defendant has proposed an unreasonable order to facilitate his plan to litigate this case in the media, to the detriment of litigating this case in the courtroom. Normal order should prevail.”

After the back-and-forth on Monday, Chutkan ordered both sides to communicate and settle on two dates and times for when they are available for a hearing to take place no later than Friday.

Trump, who faces multiple criminal indictments on both the federal and state levels — including charges in another, documents-related case brought by Smith — has broadly denied any wrongdoing while claiming he is the target of a “witch hunt.”