A Catholic Church in New York City is facing some backlash — from its own parishioners — over a display titled “God is Trans: A Queer Spiritual Journey.”

According to a report published Sunday by The New York Post, the Church of St. Paul the Apostle — located on Manhattan’s West Side — is known to be “very liberal.” Despite that, for some church members, the “God is Trans” display appears to be a bridge too far — or at least one that is going to require an explanation.

‘God is Trans’ exhibit at ‘very liberal’ NYC Catholic Church raises eyebrows https://t.co/ftjIFnLFBA pic.twitter.com/wM7C5WVaDi

— New York Post (@nypost) May 7, 2023

One parishioner told the Post the display felt out of place in the church — and noted that a priest, when asked by a friend about it, had not given an answer.

“The church should not be promoting this. I understand there are transgender people. I pray for all people but enough is enough,” the parishioner said. “It seems like they are trying to force the agenda on others,” they said. “Also, when a friend asked a priest about this they didn’t answer. You can’t put this out on the altar and then hide. That’s what gets the church in trouble.”

The exhibit reportedly details “a queer spiritual journey in three steps: Sacrifice, Identity and Communion,” and features art by Adah Unachukwu. The comparison between God and someone identifying as trans is explained by defining “sacrifice” as a move to “shed” a prior life or identity. “Identity” is then defined as individuals asking the spiritual question, “What does holiness look like?” The definition of the third step — “communion” — more closely aligns with the traditional definition and addresses a convergence between God and man.

The Post reached out to the Archdiocese of New York, but a spokesman did not offer any comment beyond stating that he had not been aware that the display existed.

The display appears to fly in the face of the Catholic Church’s official stance when it comes to the topic of gender identity. In 2019’s “Male and Female He Created Them: Towards a Path of Dialogue on the Question of Gender Theory in Education,” the church pushed back on claims that sex and gender were two separate concepts and referred to transgender identity as an attempt to “annihilate the concept of nature.”

Former Miss America Erika Harold criticized recent media coverage of disgraced — and convicted — Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes, arguing that a New York Times article profiling her “new image” was essentially rewarding her behavior.

Harold, who parlayed her 2003 pageant victory into a Harvard Law degree, critiqued the piece in a Sunday tweet. “We must stop rewarding bad behavior w/clout + clicks. Elizabeth Holmes isn’t being punished b/c she girl bossed ‘too close to the sun.’ She intentionally misled people re a biotechnological device, impacting patients, investors + employees. She doesn’t deserve a phoenix narrative.”

We must stop rewarding bad behavior w/clout + clicks. Elizabeth Holmes isn’t being punished b/c she girl bossed “too close to the sun.” She intentionally misled people re a biotechnological device, impacting patients, investors + employees. She doesn’t deserve a phoenix narrative https://t.co/Vi5yHi6IAd

— Erika Harold (@ErikaHarold) May 7, 2023

She quoted a tweet sharing NYT article — titled “Liz Holmes Wants You to Forget About Elizabeth” — along with the caption, “The black turtlenecks are gone. So is the voice. As the convicted Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes awaits prison, she has adopted a new persona.”

The “new persona,” according to the article, is “devoted mother” of two young children with partner Billy Evans — and her reinvention comes just ahead of her imminent prison sentence for corporate fraud over Theranos, her blood-testing startup.

The interview, published on Sunday, was conducted at the San Diego Zoo — with Evans and the two children in tow — by the Times’ former reporter-at-large Amy Chozick.

The implication that a transformation has taken place is reinforced by the fact that Holmes, when talking about her time with Theranos, claimed to have not been herself at all but rather a character that she had created.

Responding to Chozick, who told her that actress Jennifer Lawrence had backed out of playing her in a film, Holmes said simply, “They’re not playing me. They’re playing a character I created.”

As to why she believed she “created” that character, Holmes said, “I believed it would be how I would be good at business and taken seriously and not taken as a little girl or a girl who didn’t have good technical ideas. Maybe people picked up on that not being authentic, since it wasn’t.”