Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-WI) revealed on Tuesday that he lost his oldest daughter this week after a year-long battle with cancer.

“It is with the most profound sense of grief and joy that Sara Jane and I announce the passing of our oldest daughter, Sydney Marie (Van Orden) Martens after a year of battling a very aggressive form of cancer,” he said in a statement.

The former U.S. Navy SEAL said that his daughter “died peacefully surrounded by her family.”

“We are heartbroken that we cannot share her smile and laugh in person any longer but are so thankful that she is resting with our Lord and that we were able to spend these years with her and her family,” he said. “Sydney is survived by grandma Virginia Whitelock, husband Chris, daughter Madelyn, sons, Charlie and Roman, father and mother Derrick and Sara Jane, Sister Abigail (Williams), brothers, Theodore and Daniel, and many uncles, aunts, and cousins.”

He thanked those who have reached out and shown his family love and support through this difficult time.

Statement from Rep. Van Orden: pic.twitter.com/drkaUTtDvr

— Rep. Derrick Van Orden Press Office (@RepVanOrden) August 22, 2023

Top Republicans and some Democrats expressed public support for Van Orden after he made the announcement.

“No parent should have to experience this kind of heartbreak,” said House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA). “I’m praying for @RepVanOrden and his family during this tragic time.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP

The House Republican Conference tweeted, “We are all praying for @RepVanOrden and his family during this tragic time.”

Former Vice President Mike Pence tweeted: “@karenpence and I send our very deepest sympathies and prayers to Derrick, Sara Jane and their entire family. Such a loss. God bless and comfort you all.”

Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) responded: “I am so incredibly sorry for your loss, @RepVanOrden. My heart goes out to you and your loved ones grieving this loss and I am keeping you in my thoughts during this difficult time.”

An Alabama law banning giving cross-sex hormones and puberty blockers to children can take effect after a federal appeals court ruling.

The ruling from the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals comes as over 20 states have passed laws banning transgender procedures on children. The court ruled that there was no constitutional right for children to be given sex-change procedures and that state legislatures had the right to make laws governing the procedures.

“The plaintiffs have not presented any authority that supports the existence of a constitutional right to ‘treat [one’s] children with transitioning medications subject to medically accepted standards,’” Judge Barbara Lagoa, a Trump appointee, wrote in her opinion.

“Absent a constitutional mandate to the contrary, these types of issues are quintessentially the sort that our system of government reserves to legislative, not judicial, action,” Lagoa added.

A group of parents with transgender-identifying children had sued Alabama after the state passed a law called the “Vulnerable Child Compassion and Protection Act.”

Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall celebrated the decision, saying it “reinforced that the State has the authority to safeguard the physical and psychological wellbeing of minors, even if the United States Attorney General and radical interest groups disapprove.”

“Alabama takes this responsibility seriously by forbidding doctors from prescribing minors sex-modification procedures that have permanent and often irreversible effects. This is a significant victory for our country, for children, and for common sense,” he added.

The Left-wing Human Rights Campaign decried the ruling, claiming that the transgender procedures in question were “safe, effective, and life saving for some.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP

“We believe that at the end of the day, our nation’s courts will protect these vulnerable youth and block these harmful laws, which serve no purpose other than to prevent parents from obtaining the medical care their children need,” a statement from the HRC said.

Laws shielding children from sex-change operations have faced court challenges, with some being put on hold and ruled unconstitutional. A federal judge in Georgia this week blocked a law that prohibited children from being given cross-sex hormones, claiming that it likely violated the equal protection clause of the Constitution.

The ruling over the Alabama law follows another appeals court ruling in favor of a similar law. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals allowed a Tennessee law to take full effect after a federal judge previously blocked portions of the law earlier this year.