Chinese police arrested a journalist for the BBC who was covering the massive protests that were breaking out across the country in responses to the communist nation’s draconian coronavirus lockdown measures.

The protests reportedly began on Thursday after ten people were killed in a fire at a residential high-rise building in Urumqi, the capital city of Xinjiang autonomous region. Videos of the incident posted on social media spawned accusations that lockdowns contributed to the deaths, the New York Times and Reuters reported. Residents of the city have been locked down and prevented from leaving their homes for as long as 100 days at a time, Reuters added.

Outside Shanghai, major cities and college campuses were also the scenes of major protests. Reuters reported that demonstrations broke out in the cities of Wuhan, Chengdu, Lanzhou, and Beijing on Sunday. Protests in Wuhan reportedly turned violent, with demonstrators smashing through metal barricades, overturning testing tents, and demanding an end to lockdowns. The New York Times reported another protest in the city of Korla in northern Xinjiang.

Journalist Edward Lawrence, who has since been released, was seen being roughed up by the Chinese police in videos that went viral on social media.

Shanghai, BBC reporter Edward Lawrence was randomly arrested by Chinese police.#TheGreatTranslationMovement pic.twitter.com/PMq8rHszlm

— The Great Translation Movement 大翻译运动官方推号 (@TGTM_Official) November 27, 2022

The BBC released a statement saying that it was “extremely concerned” about the deteriorating situation in China and how the nation’s authorities were treating reporters.

“The BBC is extremely concerned about the treatment of our journalist Ed Lawrence, who was arrested and handcuffed while covering the protests in Shanghai,” the publication said. “He was held for several hours before being released. During his arrest, he was beaten and kicked by the police. This happened while he was working as an accredited journalist.”

“It is very worrying that one of our journalists was attacked in this way whilst carrying out his duties,” the statement continued. “We have had no official explanation or apology from the Chinese authorities, beyond a claim by the officials who later released him that they had arrested him for his own good in case he caught Covid from the crowd. We do not consider this a credible explanation.”

A statement from the BBC on what happened to me in Shanghai last night while doing my job.

I understand at least one local national was arrested after trying to stop the police from beating me.

Thanks very much for the kind words and messages of concern. https://t.co/weoDAMakvO

— Edward Lawrence (@EP_Lawrence) November 28, 2022

Lawrence posted another video since the incident where he showed police were forcing people to show authorities their phones and then were forcing those people to delete photos and videos from the protests.

People being forced to delete photos by the police today at the of the last two days of protests #shanghai #china pic.twitter.com/VS1kFSoh3x

— Edward Lawrence (@EP_Lawrence) November 28, 2022

John Rigolizzo contributed to this report.

A woman is suing over how much time it took her to make Velveeta macaroni and cheese after the packaging claimed it would only take a matter of minutes. 

On behalf of herself and others, Amanda Ramirez is suing Kraft Heinz Foods Company for $5 million over its mac-and-cheese product promises. The food item’s packaging claims that the macaroni and cheese will be ready in three-and-a-half minutes, but Ramirez alleged that it takes more time to make the product when other steps are taken into consideration. 

“The statement of ‘ready in 3½ minutes’ is false and misleading because the Product takes longer than 3-and-a-half minutes to prepare for consumption,” the lawsuit stated. It went on to describe the process of making the food and the directions involved. 

“Consumers seeing ‘ready in 3½ minutes’ will believe it represents the total amount of time it takes to prepare the Product, meaning from the moment it is unopened to the moment it is ready for consumption,” it stated. 

The lawsuit also alleged that the macaroni product is able to be marketed at a higher cost because of its claims about how soon the food can be ready to eat. 

In a statement to The Washington Post, the Kraft Heinz Co. said that they knew about the “frivolous lawsuit” and “will strongly defend against the allegations in the complaint.”

William Wright of the Wright Law Office in West Palm Beach, and Spencer Sheehan of Sheehan & Associates in Great Neck, New York, reportedly filed the lawsuit this month. 

“I’ve gotten a lot of flak about this case, but deceptive advertising is deceptive advertising,” Wright told the Post on Monday over email. “Here, Kraft charges extra for a desirable feature (saving time) but the marketing is false, it takes far longer for the product to be ready than as advertised. Deceptive advertising plain and simple.” 

“There are a lot of people that may feel this is just a little fibbing and not really a case and I get that. But we are striving for something better,” Wright said in the email. “We want corporate America to be straightforward and truthful in advertising their products. My firm also represents clients in what most would say are more compelling cases (arsenic in baby food, etc.) but we don’t feel corporations should get a pass for any deceptive advertising. The consumers deserve better.”

The lawsuit taps into the efforts of many Americans to make their money go further in the current economic environment of sky-high inflation. The filing claims that Ramirez “is like many consumers who seek to stretch their money as far as possible when buying groceries” and “looks to bold statements of value when quickly selecting groceries.”