Chatbots are all the rage in the west. ChatGPT, Bing Chat, Jasper and many others have taken our societies by storm, and many people have become obsessed with this popular application of Artificial Intelligence (AI).

Chinese Tech Giants, not to be outdone, are also developing many models of Chatbot both for the Chinese market as well as for export.

But the development of these applications has found a difficulty that is specific to the Chinese society: censure.

The Chinese government has issued regulations requiring chatbots that use artificial intelligence to stick to the ruling Communist Party line.

Programmers and companies developing bots that do not follow this directive will be held responsible for any ‘subversive’ output.

It’s expected in the industry that this move ‘will likely be the death of further innovation in the sector.’

Radio Free Asia reports:

“‘The content generated by generative artificial intelligence should reflect the core values ​​of socialism,’ the country’s Cyberspace Administration said in draft rules issued for public feedback and comment on April 11.

‘[It] must not contain subversion of state power, overthrow of the socialist system, incitement to split the country, undermine national unity [or] promote terrorism [and] extremism,’ it said, using phrases typically used to target public dissent and criticism of the government.”

The authorities want to see this implemented by year’s end, as Tech Firms are rushing to develop their own chatbots.

Meanwhile, regulators have warned companies not to make available the artificial intelligence ChatGPT to the public.

In 2017, a chatbot called ‘Baby Q’ was discontinued, “after it referred to the government as a ‘corrupt regime’, claimed it had no love for the Communist Party and said it dreamed of emigrating to the United States, amid reports that its programmers had been hauled in for questioning by police.”

Organizations and individuals using AI products to provide services will be held responsible for their output.

Computer scientist Zhang Xiaogang:

“A dictatorial regime will always try to control everything, but this is a ridiculous approach,” Zhang said. “Restricting such things is tantamount to restricting AI itself, which will cause China’s AI to fall behind the rest of the world.”

The post Chinese Chatbots Must Toe the Communist Party Line – Regulations Expected to Kill Innovation In This Sector appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

A federal judge on Monday denied Trump’s request to delay E. Jean Carroll’s rape case against President Trump.

Trump sought to delay the trial arguing a “cooling off” period was needed since he was just indicted by a Manhattan grand jury.

“There is no justification for an adjournment,” Judge Lewis Kaplan, a Clinton appointee ruled. “This case is entirely unrelated to the state prosecution.”

ABC News reported:

A federal judge in New York on Monday denied former President Donald Trump’s latest attempt to delay the trial in the defamation and battery case brought by former Elle columnist E. Jean Carroll.

Trump sought a one-month delay of the trial, slated to begin on April 25, arguing a “cooling off” period was necessary following intense media coverage of his criminal indictment in Manhattan last month in connection with an alleged hush money payment to an adult film actress.

The judge called the suggestion that the coverage could preclude the selection of a fair jury “pure speculation.”

The judge included a pointed reminder that the postponement Trump sought may be a mixed blessing.

“Events happen during postponements. Sometimes they can make matters worse,” Kaplan wrote in this decision, noting the multiple criminal and investigations Trump faces.

“Developments in at least one of these matters, as well as actions and statements by Mr. Trump in relation to any, may well give rise to intense publicity that, in some respects, Mr. Trump might claim to be prejudicial in this case,” the judge said. “Mr. Trump’s suggestion that a one-month trial postponement in this case would ensure the absence of any such developments in the period immediately preceding jury selection is not realistic.”

Last week it was revealed billionaire LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman – a Democrat megadonor – is secretly funding E. Jean Carroll’s rape case against President Trump.

This DIRECTLY contradicts E. Jean Carroll’s claim during an October deposition that no one else was paying her legal bills.

E. Jean Carroll appears to have committed perjury.

In 2019, E. Jean Carroll alleged Donald Trump raped her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the 1990’s.

E. Jean Carroll is a mentally unwell woman who previously told CNN she fantasizes about rape.

Trump has denied the allegations and called E. Jean Carroll a “whack job” who’s “not my type.”

Carroll refiled the lawsuit in November after New York passed the Adult Survivors Act which allows adults to sue over sexual assaults that occurred decades ago.

Trump’s lawyers ripped E. Jean Carroll and her lawyers in a court filing last Thursday.

“The proposition that [Carroll] has suddenly ‘recollected’ the source of her funding for this high-profile litigation—which has spanned four years, spawned two separate actions, and been before numerous state, federal, and appellate courts—is not only preposterous, it is demonstrably false. Indeed, it simply defies logic to believe that [Carroll’s] attorneys—four of whom were present at her deposition—were unaware that their own firm had ‘secured additional funding from a nonprofit organization’ to bankroll their client’s various lawsuits and ensure their bills were being paid,” Trump’s lawyers Habba and Tacopina wrote to Judge Kaplan Thursday.

Trump’s lawyers said E. Jean Carroll perjured herself.

The post JUST IN: Clinton-Appointed Judge Denies Trump Request to Delay E Jean Carroll’s Rape, Defamation Trial appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.