LA Times Says White Drivers Cause Air Pollution in Los Angeles Which Negatively Impacts People of Color

Sammy Roth, a writer for the LA Times and the weekly Boiling Point newsletter, published an article in which he claimed that many people of color in the Los Angeles area are subjected to a form of environmental racism as a result of the presence of affluent and white drivers.

Roth shared a new study from USC researchers that found Angelenos who drove more were subjected to less air pollution than those who drove less.

“It may sound like a paradox, but it’s not. It’s a function of the racism that shaped this city and its suburbs, and continues to influence our daily lives — and a stark reminder of the need for climate solutions that benefit everyone,” said Roth.

According to Roth, the primary finding of the study is that the amount of lung-damaging “fine particulate matter” that residents of a specific area of LA County are exposed to decreases by an estimated 0.62% for every one percent increase in miles driven to and from work by those residents.

He asked the study’s lead author, Geoff Boeing, a professor at the USC Sol Price School of Public Policy.

“He told me it largely comes down to the shameful history of Los Angeles County’s low-income communities of color being torn apart to make way for freeways — a history that has been extensively documented by The Times. Today, many residents of the county’s whiter, more affluent neighborhoods — who were often able to keep highways out of their own backyards — commute to work through lower-income Black and Latino neighborhoods bisected by the 10, 110 and 105 freeways and more.”

“It’s not like commuters are coming in and shopping in those communities, patronizing restaurants,” Boeing said. “They’re just driving through to get from one side of the city to the other.”

More from FOX News:

The study itself is titled, “Local Inequities in the Relative Production of and Exposure to Vehicular Air Pollution in Los Angeles.” The study’s abstract defines its findings in explicitly racial terms.

“We find that, all else equal, tracts whose residents drive less are exposed to more air pollution, as are tracts with a less-White population. Commuters from majority-White tracts disproportionately drive through non-White tracts, compared to the inverse,” the researchers wrote.

They went on to say, “Decades of racially-motivated freeway infrastructure planning and residential segregation shape today’s disparities in who produces vehicular air pollution and who is exposed to it, but opportunities exist for urban planning and transport policy to mitigate this injustice.”

He shared one particular map from the study and wrote, “The red areas are places in L.A. County where commuters tend to be whiter than people who live there; the blue areas are places where commuters tend to be less white than people who live there.”

He later adds, “the map shows how residents of whiter, wealthier communities disproportionately drive to work through lower-income Latino and Black neighborhoods, spewing pollution. Residents of those neighborhoods can’t do much about it.”

Solutions he suggested range from “ending the sale of most gasoline vehicles” to allowing more apartment construction in wealthier neighborhoods.

The article received a lot of negative feedback.

The air is racist now 🤡🤡🤡 https://t.co/tpOeaqX0qC

— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) March 9, 2023

Congratulations to the author of this piece @Sammy_Roth. You have managed to write not only the most idiotic but racist piece of 2023!

— Nick Short ‎‎ (@PoliticalShort) March 9, 2023

REMINDER: There aren’t separate communist groups. They’re all the same group with the same goal: Destroying this nation.

That’s why seemingly separate groups work together. The climate nutters work with the race hustlers who work with the LGBTQ demon mob who work with… https://t.co/UIFOLpeAa6

— Jesse Kelly (@JesseKellyDC) March 9, 2023

They should create a Pulitzer for dumbest articles of the millennium just so this article can win the price it deserves

— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) March 9, 2023

This has become like old timey, nonsensical racism at this point…

— Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) March 9, 2023

The post LA Times Says White Drivers Cause Air Pollution in Los Angeles Which Negatively Impacts People of Color appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Wyoming Rep. Harriet Hageman: Democrats ‘Don’t Like the First Amendment’

During a recent interview with Newsmax, Wyoming Republican Rep. Harriet Hageman suggested that Democrats don’t like the First Amendment of the Constitution.

It’s impossible to argue with that point. In truth, Hageman didn’t go far enough.

Democrats don’t like the First Amendment or the Second Amendment. It’s difficult to know which one they hate more.

Newsmax reported:

Rep. Hageman to Newsmax: Democrats ‘Don’t Like the First Amendment’

Rep. Harriet Hageman, R-Wyo., told Newsmax that the message she took away from Thursday’s House Weaponization Subcommittee hearing was that the Democrats “don’t like the First Amendment.”

“What they like is censorship, and they like to control what people can say and what people can hear,” Hageman said during an appearance Thursday on Newsmax’s “Spicer & Co.”

“We had two gentlemen who appeared before us who are admitted Democrats, both of them said that they voted for Joe Biden, and from the very first moment that the Democrats started questioning them or doing an opening statement or anything else, they just lambasted these two gentlemen.

“But again, what I will say is that the Democrats are terribly concerned about the fact that we have a First Amendment right in this country, and I think they’d like to see that changed,” she added.

Hageman said that the House panel probing the weaponization of government examined the First Amendment in the first two hearings and the “federal government’s effort to suppress the First Amendment rights of citizens of this country by proxy.”

“They were using Twitter and Facebook and other media organizations to not only stop people from being able to speak, but to stop all of us from hearing from people as well,” she said.

Harriet Hageman is such a massive improvement over Liz Cheney.

The proposed Biden budget is pure fantasy & will fortunately never be passed.

Among the ridiculous proposals:

1)Highest personal income tax rate since 1986
2)Highest capital gains rate since 1978
3)$31 billion in new taxes on oil & gas

We need to spend less, not tax more.

— Rep. Harriet Hageman (@RepHageman) March 9, 2023

Over the past two years America has gone from energy dominance to energy dependence – an issue of concern to not only the citizens of Wyoming, but to the entire country. At approx 10am ET I’ll speak from the House floor on this critical issue-watch it live https://t.co/JOTq6OpPCu

— Rep. Harriet Hageman (@RepHageman) February 28, 2023

Wyoming voters made the right decision.

The post Wyoming Rep. Harriet Hageman: Democrats ‘Don’t Like the First Amendment’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.