The Democrat Party of Virginia is so desperate to regain control of the House, its leadership is now backing a candidate who posted pornographic content online.

A Democrat candidate running for Virginia’s House of Delegates posted sex acts with her husband online dubbed “HotWifeExperience” – while soliciting ‘tips’ from their online audience.

Susanna Gibson, a 40-year-old mother of 2 children running for a seat in the 57th district in suburban Richmond, reportedly used a platform called Chaturbate to stream sex acts with her husband in exchange for ‘tokens.’

Susanna Gibson

According to the Washington Post, archived videos of Gibson’s pornographic content were then posted to a platform called Recurbate in September 2022 after she entered the political race as a Democrat candidate.

According to The Post, Gibson violated Chaturbate’s terms of service by asking for ‘tokens’ in exchange for performing certain sex acts in a “private room.”

“I need, like, more tokens before I let him do that,” Gibson told her online audience referring to a specific sex act with her husband in an effort to solicit “tips.”

Gibson remained defiant after her pornographic videos were discovered by a Republican operative. She told the Washington Post that the incident was “an illegal invasion of my privacy designed to humiliate me and my family.”

“It won’t intimidate me and it won’t silence me,” Gibson told the Washington Post. “My political opponents and their Republican allies have proven they’re willing to commit a sex crime to attack me and my family because there’s no line they won’t cross to silence women when they speak up.”

After getting caught publicly posting this smut online, Gibson had the nerve to blast her opponents for engaging in “the worst gutter politics.”

Clips of Gibson’s X-rated videos were posted to X (formerly Twitter) after the Washington Post reported on her scandal.

Susanna Gibson however has the backing of leading Virginia Democrat lawmaker L. Louise Lucas.

President Pro tempore, Senate of Virginia L. Louise Lucas helped Susanna Gibson fundraise after the X-rated videos circulated on X.

“Today Glenn Youngkin’s team leaked videos of Susanna Gibson to try to embarrass and humiliate her and they failed completely.”

“Now we are going to make this the biggest fundraising day of her campaign,” she said.

Today Glenn Youngkin’s team leaked videos of @SusannaSGibson to try to embarrass and humiliate her and they failed completely.

Now we are going to make this the biggest fundraising day of her campaign.

Retweet and donate here:https://t.co/LrP5VhDsb1

— L. Louise Lucas (@SenLouiseLucas) September 11, 2023

“Let’s all work as hard to elect Democrats today as Glenn Youngkin’s staff works going through porn websites “looking for opposition research,” L. Louise Lucas said on Tuesday.

Let’s all work as hard to elect Democrats today as Glenn Youngkin’s staff works going through porn websites “looking for opposition research”.

— L. Louise Lucas (@SenLouiseLucas) September 12, 2023

The post Democrat Leader Backs Virginia Candidate Who Livestreamed Sex Acts with Her Husband Online Dubbed “HotWifeExperience” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

(Photo by CocaKolaLips on Pexels)

This article originally appeared on WND.com

Guest by post by Bob Unruh 

‘It is shocking such a menace was allowed to remain free’

Constitutional expert and legal pundit Jonathan Turley, the George Washington University professor who has testified before, and represented Congress, on Tuesday cited the case of a student, 6 years old, who “not only engaged in a game of cops and robbers but actually added ‘bang, bang’ to the game.”

He was suspended by his school.

The student was identified only a J.B., and Turley warned, “It is shocking that such a menace was allowed to remain free in our society.”

He was, of course, being sarcastic over society’s penchant for digging deep into the book of punishments for students who engaged in such play-acting.

The fact remains that no one ever has been injured, seriously or otherwise, by a finger accidentally or deliberately being discharged.

“This absurdity is reportedly the product of Donna Page, assistant principal at Bagley Elementary School, who was given the report of a finger gun and immediately began a disciplinary process against J.B. Rather than use a modicum of discretion and common sense to protect this child, the school proceeded with formal disciplinary measures for a ‘3.22 Threat’ infraction,” Turley reported.

“One can only imagine school security officers yelling ‘Code 3.22’ into walkie talkies as adults scramble to face the threat of J.B.’s fully loaded finger guns. After all, J.B. could imagine any calibre of weapon and has no limitation on reloading or ammo,” Turley said.

Fox News reported the situation was documented in Jefferson County, Alabama, by the boy’s father, Jerrod Belcher.

The report said Belcher’s son was accused of a “Class III” infraction by “using his fingers to shoot at another student.” A suspension from school was the punishment.

In a letter sent to Jefferson County school officials on Friday, Belcher’s attorney, M. Reed Martz, demanded that the school ‘immediately and publicly confirm it will remove any record of an infraction, disciplinary action, or other sort of report’ from J.B.’s record. Gun Owners of America, a national Second Amendment group, partnered with the attorney and state-based BamaCarry in Alabama to send the letter to school administrators, the report explained.

J.B. was playing “cops and robbers” with another student. They pointed their fingers at each other and said, “Bang, bang.”‘

The legal letter explained the students didn’t disrupt any activities, did not threaten any students and did not interfere with school functions.

Martz explained age “apparently lacked the insight and judgment to see the ordinary children’s play for what it was, immediately began a disciplinary process against J.B.”

The school’s handbook insists a 3.22 threat, with which J.B. was charged, includes “A threat to do serious bodily harm or violence to another student by word or act, cyber bullying, or intimidation that may induce fear into another.”

Examples: “A threat to kill, maim, or inflict serious harm; a threat to inflict harm involving the use of any weapon, explosive, firearm, knife, prohibited object, or other object which may be perceived by the individual being threatened as capable of inflicting bodily harm.”

Martz noted that under the school’s ideology, “J.B. would be subject to a lesser maximum penalty had he punched the other student in the face!”

Turley, in his column, included a list of links to a number of similar cases he’s comment on, and said, “This ridiculous use of zero tolerance rules will not end until administrators are held accountable. A few suspensions of staff would go a long way in restoring sanity to our schools.

WND also has reported on similar cases over the years:

When a 6-year-old girl was reported to police for pointing her finger like a gun.

A case that revealed bringing a real gun was a misdemeanor, but point a finger was a felony.

Another boy suspended for pointing his finger.

When a first-grader was suspended for the same thing.

When a 12-year-old was cuffed for point a finger.

When a 13-year-old girl was charged by police for the offense.

Multiple similar cases have developed, too, when children use toy guns.

And perhaps the most extreme scenario developed when a student was suspended because he “chewed his breakfast pastry into the shape of a gun and pretended to shoot classmates.”

A judge affirmed the suspension, finding the boy “disrupted his class,” reports said.

The post ‘Bang!’ School That Punished Boy for ‘Finger Gun’ Gets Skewered appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.