The primary race between Rep. Jamaal Bowman, D-N.Y., and Westchester County, N.Y., Executive George Latimer tells a story.

It’s a story which will say a lot about the Democratic Party, circa 2024.

And it’s a story Democrats may wish would disappear just four-and-half months before the November election. 

SENATE STUMPED OVER COVID ORIGINS: WHAT WE KNOW – AND DON’T KNOW

The primary challenge race Bowman and Latimer highlights schisms in the Democratic Party. It exposes the raw nerves between progressives like Bowman and more mainstream Democrats like Latimer. It also underscores the fissure over the Middle East which is cleaving the party. Bowman lambastes Israel over the war against Hamas. Latimer is outspoken in his defense of Israel.

Latimer decided to challenge Bowman after the Congressman formerly denied sexual violence and other atrocities by Hamas.

"There’s still no evidence of beheaded babies or raped women. But they still keep using that lie. Propaganda," said Bowman in a TikTok video which went viral.

It took until last week for Bowman to retract those comments during an appearance on WNYC-FM in New York.

"Immediately when the UN provided additional evidence, I voted to condemn the sexual violence. I apologize for my comments," said Bowman on WNYC. 

The pro-Israel political action committee AIPAC poured money into the campaign of Latimer after Bowman lashed out at Isarel. The race emerged as the most-expensive primary in House history. The tab: a whopping $24 million between the candidates combined.

But it’s the involvement of groups like AIPAC playing in the race which spurred the progressive cavalry to ride to the aid of Bowman. Bowman surrogates didn’t linger on his differences with Israel. Instead, they targeted the influx of cash into the race.

"This election is not about a clash of ideas. This election is about whether billionaire super PACs can buy our democracy," said Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.

"Since he has been elected to Congress, he has not accepted one dime of corporate lobbyists," said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., while campaigning for Bowman. "Why does he do that? Because he knows if you take corporate money, if you take lobbyist money, you can not put the people of Westchester first."

Bowman put it in more profane terms while campaigning over the weekend.

BIDEN'S ATTORNEY GENERAL IS FIGHTING BACK AS THE GOP-LED HOUSE CONTEMPLATES CONTEMPT

"We are gonna show f$*king AIPAC the power of the motherf–king South Bronx," boasted Bowman at an expletive-laden campaign rally outside the district Saturday. 

Latimer called such coarse language "inappropriate."

"I think I get the right to lose my temper," said Latimer. "I don’t think I get the right to curse in public."

Bowman continued his salty rant to an adoring crowd in the Bronx.

"People ask me why I got a foul mouth. What am I supposed to do? You coming after me? You coming after my family? You coming after my children? I'm not supposed to fight back?  I'm not supposed to fight back? We're gonna show them who the f&%$ we are," warned Bowman.

That distills the quintessence of the Bowman/Latimer race. Different styles. Different approaches. Different ways to connect with Democratic voters.

"X. For Gen X. For the Bronx. X. From Malcom X!" thundered Bowman.

"What I’ve offered is a slogan that says results. Not rhetoric," said Latimer. 

And then there is the geography of the district. Progressives dot the urban areas of the north Bronx which Bowman represents now. Same with inner suburbs like Yonkers and New Rochelle. But it’s a different game when you tread deeper into Westchester County. That’s home to a significant pro-Israel, Jewish population. Especially in towns like Rye Brook and Mamaroneck. 

Voters aren’t as progressive as you creep out of New York City. 

"Bowman’s support diminishes as you go north in Westchester County," said Ross Baker, a political scientist at Rutgers University who’s watched the race. "It’s really tapering off pretty dramatically when you get to places like Rye. So it’s basically Latimer country." 

Bowman finds himself squeezed in an electoral vice between progressives and energized voters who align with Israel. That’s why the contest is a bellwether for the internal rift which torments the Democratic Party.

FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP AND HOUSE SPEAKER MIKE JOHNSON: WHO NEEDS WHO?

"If Jamaal Bowman also falls, I think it would deliver a pretty strong message that this particular wing of the Democratic Party is out of favor with Democratic primary voters," said Baker. "(The Middle East) is right on the fault line between progressives and moderates. And both candidates are perfect examples of what their various factions represent."

Latimer tries to contrast his views with those held by Bowman. 

"He had other members of the squad have an active, aggressive, anti-Israel situation. If there’s a path to peace, then you have to have Israel and the Arab world at the table and they have to negotiate this out."

Bowman was controversial before the war in the Middle East. U.S. Capitol Police charged him criminally after he pulled a fire alarm in the Cannon House Office Building last fall during a vote to avoid a government shutdown. 

"It was a dumb choice," said Bowman after his court appearance. "I take full responsibility for it now. I’m trying to move on. Just do my job."

Bowman avoided jail time. But he faced a fine and had to exhibit good behavior for a couple of months. The judge also required him to write a letter of apology to the U.S. Capitol Police. 

Former. Rep. Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., who chaired the House Foreign Affairs Committee and was a major supporter of Israel, represented the district for three decades. But Bowman defeated Engel in a 2020 primary. That loss by Engel represented a leftward tilt by Democrats and an emergence by progressives in the House Democratic Caucus. Ocasio-Cortez defeated former Rep. Joe Crowley, D-N.Y., in the New York primary in 2018. Crowley was thought by many to be a potential successor to former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. Then came other progressives. Rep. Cori Bush, D-Mo., took out former Rep. William Lacy Clay, D-Mo., in a 2020 primary as well. 

But the war in the Middle East began to reveal friction in the Democratic coalition. The fight over the Bowman/Latimer race is a microcosm of this. The Mideast conflict is why President Biden may struggle to get younger voters to the polls this fall. He and other Democrats may also face trouble in regions with significant Arab or Muslim populations like Michigan. 

But the race is a litmus test for the direction of the party. A Bowman loss may show fractures with progressives. But a single loss could just be a one-off. However, Bush is on the ballot in a primary contest against St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell and former state senator Maria Chappelle-Nadal in August. It’s a trend if Bowman loses – potentially followed by a loss later this summer by Bush. 

And the lesson for the Democratic Party? There’s a lot of division on their side of the aisle.

Let's face it, social media has become a mixed bag. Sure, it promised to connect us all in ways we never imagined, but let's be real: The downsides are starting to overshadow the upsides.

It's funny how your birth year can totally shape your view on this digital playground. Some of us might shrug off the issues, thinking, "No big deal," while others are going to extremes, ditching their smartphones for old-school flip phones just to escape the social media circus. It's like we're all trying to figure out our own social media survival strategies.

And then there are the parents. Oh boy, are they in for a ride, especially if they've got teenagers. They're busy crafting rules faster than you can say "TikTok," hoping to keep their kids safe in this wild digital world. But here's the kicker: It feels like they're running a never-ending race. Just when they think they've got a handle on things, boom, another app or platform pops up, and they're back to square one. It's like trying to nail jelly to a wall – frustrating, messy and seemingly impossible.

Welcome to the social media age, folks, where the only constant is change.

GET SECURITY ALERTS, EXPERT TIPS - SIGN UP FOR KURT’S NEWSLETTER - THE CYBERGUY REPORT HERE

Social media platforms have become integral to our daily lives, but the impact they have had on mental health, productivity and even politics has gotten progressively worse over the years. Though awareness has been raised on this issue, which has helped people learn how to create boundaries for it, we're still not able to stay ahead of what social media will do next.

Here are just some of the dangers of social media:

1) Exposure to scammers: Children and adolescents are vulnerable to online scams and fraudulent schemes.

2) Excessive screen time: Prolonged use of social media can lead to physical and mental health issues, including eye strain, poor posture and disrupted sleep patterns.

3) Dopamine-driven notifications: Frequent notifications can create addictive behavior patterns, leading to increased anxiety and reduced ability to focus.

4) Negative body image: Social media often promotes unrealistic body standards, contributing to body dissatisfaction and eating disorders.

5) Cyberbullying: Many young users face harassment and bullying online, which can lead to severe psychological distress.

6) Exposure to inaccurate news: The spread of misinformation and fake news on social media can influence young minds and contribute to anxiety and confusion.

HOW TO REMOVE YOUR PRIVATE DATA FROM THE INTERNET 

This isn't the first time that issues concerning social media have reached the government. Most recently, U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy called on Congress to introduce a warning label on social media apps to highlight the potential harm these platforms pose to young people.

Murthy's push for this warning label aligns with longstanding concerns from youth advocates and lawmakers who have criticized social media giants like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and Snapchat for their detrimental effects on children. These effects include contributing to mental health issues such as anxiety, depression, cyberbullying, vulnerability to predators, and, in the worst cases, suicide.

In fact, according to the NIH, "...age-adjusted suicide rates have steadily increased over the past decade in the United States with suicide being the second most common cause of death in youth. Hence, the increase in suicide rate parallels the simultaneous increase in social media use. In addition, the rate of non-suicidal self-injury ranges between 14% and 21% among young people."

In the meantime, according to the article, "New York state lawmakers this month passed legislation to bar social media platforms from exposing "addictive" algorithmic content to users under age 18 without parental consent."

HOW TO PROTECT YOURSELF FROM SOCIAL MEDIA SCAMMERS

BALANCING THE PROS AND CONS OF SOCIAL MEDIA SCREEN TIME

If this warning does get approved through Congress, it would, of course, take some time before we actually see "warning labels," and it's unclear what that would actually look like. But if it did happen, here's what could potentially happen:

Increased awareness: Warning labels could make parents and adolescents more aware of the potential mental health risks associated with social media use.

Behavioral change: Similar to the impact of tobacco warning labels, these could encourage healthier social media habits and reduce usage among vulnerable groups.

Pressure on social media companies: Companies may be compelled to implement stricter safety measures and better content moderation practices to avoid legal and public relations issues.

Resistance from tech companies: Powerful social media companies may lobby against the legislation, leading to protracted legal battles and potential delays in implementation.

Perceived insufficiency: Warning labels alone may be seen as a minimal effort, insufficient to address the deeper, systemic issues of social media's impact on mental health.

Potential stigma: Warning labels could unintentionally stigmatize social media use, leading to fear or anxiety rather than informed, balanced usage.

Depending on what your own stance is on social media, the fact of the matter is that it does have the potential to harm too many vulnerable people, especially children and teenagers. And if you're not in this demographic but still struggle with managing your social media usage, then there are some ways you can limit your time:

1) Set boundaries: This is not easy for everyone, but make it your goal to limit screen time and establish specific times of day for checking social media to prevent overuse. You can check how much time you're on the screen by looking up the "screen-time" function on your device.

2) Manage notifications: Turn off non-essential notifications to reduce constant interruptions and the dopamine-driven urge to check your phone.

3) Don't give away sensitive information online: Always be careful of what information and photos you put online. It's never too difficult for someone to find.

4) Log out of social media on your phone: Not having the social media apps installed on your device and logging off of them on the browser (they make it easy to log back in with one click, so you'll need to go the extra mile) can help you get off social media.

5) Don't take things personally: Though social media can be a dangerous tool, and any harassment, stalking or other misconduct should be reported to the authorities, most negative people on social media are "trolls." Ignore them, don't engage with them, and report them to the platform, if need be.

6) Get a dumb phone: Many people are trading in their smartphones for a dumb phone, which helps them to get off of social media.

7) Install parental controls: Phones, laptops and other tablets come with parental controls that parents can use to limit their child's social media activity. But it's important to also talk about the dangers of social media with them, and if they are allowed on it, what the ground rules are. Get my top four child monitoring programs of 2024.

HOW TO TAME THE BARRAGE OF STEALTHY SOCIAL MEDIA NOTIFICATIONS AND REGAIN CONTROL

Social media is fine if used appropriately, responsibly and in moderation. But its potential to do harm is something that's important to take seriously, especially if you're a parent and/or someone who has already suffered from anxiety or depression. Essentially, if what it's taking from you is more than what it's giving to you, it may be time to reconsider your relationship with your social media platforms or at least put some restrictions on it.

Do you enforce social media restrictions on yourself and/or your children? If so, why? And what are your thoughts on putting a warning label on social media platforms? Let us know by writing us at Cyberguy.com/Contact.

For more of my tech tips and security alerts, subscribe to my free CyberGuy Report Newsletter by heading to Cyberguy.com/Newsletter.

Ask Kurt a question or let us know what stories you'd like us to cover.

Follow Kurt on his social channels:

 Answers to the most asked CyberGuy questions:

Copyright 2024 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.