Legalized sports gambling in North Carolina cleared one of its last legislative hurdles Tuesday as the House accepted changes made by the Senate that include adding horse racing to the betting mix and raising the state's cut of wagering revenues.

The chamber must agree to the altered measure one more time Wednesday for the Republican-controlled General Assembly to finalize the legislation and send it to Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper, who has expressed support for authorizing and regulating sports wagering.

Opponents of the current bill remain worried about how a large expansion of gambling beyond the current state lottery would increase addictions, harming families and low-income residents.

The die appeared cast with Tuesday's 67-42 vote, which came nearly a year after a coalition of social conservatives and liberals in the House s cuttled a previous sports wagering measure.

But a new group of elected legislators took their seats in January. They heard from bill supporters who said betting on games was already happening underground or offshore, and that it was best for the state to control the activity and tax it. Nearly half of the House members became co-sponsors of a new bill that the chamber approved in March. Bipartisan support has remained strong in the Senate, leading to votes of approval there last week.

THESE STATES ARE FINDING CREATIVE WAYS TO SUPPORT FREE SPEECH ON CAMPUS

There was no debate Tuesday, which House Speaker Tim Moore attributed later to scheduling conflicts for legislators. He anticipated debate Wednesday, but the outcome of a second such concurrence vote rarely changes.

Asked earlier Tuesday whether he would sign the sports gambling measure into law once it reached his desk, Cooper told reporters "I am generally in support for the sports-betting legislation. But we’re continuing to look at it."

Momentum for licensing gambling on professional, college and Olympic-style sports took off as lobbyists for the sports wagering industry and professional sports franchises that stand to profit pushed for the idea in the ninth-largest state. About half of the states allow mobile or online sports betting, according to the American Gaming Association. Legal sports gambling in North Carolina is available right now at the state’s only three casinos, which are operated by two American Indian tribes.

The consensus measure would direct the North Carolina Lottery Commission to issue up to 12 interactive sports wagering licenses to entities that would be subject to robust background checks and $1 million application fees. While betting could begin as early as January, the commission would have until June 2024 to open the betting lines.

Adults with wagering accounts could bet online through computers or mobile phones. But proposed sportsbooks offered at or near pro sports venues, race tracks and golf courses could take cash bets from anyone over 21. Horse-race betting would be allowed through separate gambling operators.

The legislation would tax sports wagering at a rate equal to 18% of gross betting revenue minus winnings. The earlier proposal in the House set a similar 14% tax with more deductions.

After expenses, legislative analysts estimate the state would take in $71 million annually by mid-2028 from both sports wagering and horse racing. Much of the sports wagering tax revenues would go to local, regional and state athletics initiatives, athletic programs at most University of North Carolina system schools and problem-gambling programs.

Reparations advocates in California are frustrated with the lack of action on reparations among Democrats in the state and one elected official said the state was "not as liberal as people want us to believe." 

"California is not as liberal as people want us to believe," Democratic State Sen. Steven Bradford, the vice chair of the Legislative Black Caucus, told Politico. "When it comes to the real issue that impacts us the most, race, we’re hesitant to really buck the curve."

Bradford, who also sits on California's reparations panel, told Politico that he doesn't expect any reparations legislation to advance until next year. 

A Democratic strategist told the outlet that things were more likely to advance in a time of "crisis," suggesting that California reparations advocates might have missed their chance to advance the agenda.

CALIFORNIA REPARATIONS PANEL SAYS TOTAL COST 'LEAST IMPORTANT' ASPECT DESPITE POTENTIAL $800B PRICE TAG

"Things get done in a time of crisis, and that was a time of crisis for a lot of people that crystallized what’s been going on in America in a very visual way," Democratic strategist Steve Maviglio said. "Sad to say, it’s recent memory, it’s not on everybody’s front burner. What is is crime and punishment again, and that is winning the day."

California's reparations task force is set to present their findings and recommendations to Gov. Gavin Newsom on July 1. 

Newsom has said that reparations are about "much more" than cash payments and declined to support any specific recommendations. 

"The Reparations Task Force’s independent findings and recommendations are a milestone in our bipartisan effort to advance justice and promote healing. This has been an important process, and we should continue to work as a nation to reconcile our original sin of slavery and understand how that history has shaped our country," Newsom said in a statement to Fox News Digital. 

CALIFORNIA REPARATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS HAVE NEWSOM BETWEEN ROCK AND HARD PLACE

The panel approved payment of up to $1.2 million for every qualifying Black resident in May. 

Bradford told Politico that racism was a bigger hurdle than party in advancing "progressive, liberal bills" in the state legislature.

"This country was built on white supremacy as a whole," he said. "I think racism is a bigger factor than party, because we have Democratic majorities in both houses, and we still struggle to move these progressive, liberal bills."

Natasha Minsker, a policy adviser for Smart Justice California, told Politico that California Democrats missed their opportunity to voice their support for reparations in the legislature by rejecting proposals related to police reform.

"I do hope that legislators understand that supporting the work of the reparations task force means supporting police reform," Minsker said. "The history of policing in the United States is unfortunately deeply tied to slave patrols and the whole history of enforcing slavery as an institution."