"As you know, I’m covered by the Hatch Act" is a phrase many in the White House Briefing Room are used to hearing from White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre. In fact, Jean-Pierre has invoked the Hatch Act on 33 occasions at the podium since September.

The Hatch Act, a New Deal-era federal law, prohibits government employees from engaging in political activities or promoting a political campaign — the president and vice president are notably exempted.

Some White House reporters have expressed frustration with the press secretary's frequent use of the Hatch Act, accusing Jean-Pierre of misusing the law in order to evade tough questions, according to a recent Politico report.

Richard Painter, a former chief White House ethics lawyer in the George W. Bush administration, says that questions regarding the president’s medical records as he faces a reelection decision are legitimate and unrelated to the Hatch Act.

"It sounds like she’s overly broad in her application of the Hatch Act. It’s just that she doesn’t want to answer a question on the president’s medical records," said Painter.

In December, Jean-Pierre notably refused to answer questions by citing the Hatch Act when asked about President Joe Biden traveling to Georgia during the Senate runoff, if Biden would release results from his physical examination, and if he or other politicians plan on returning political donations from disgraced FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried.

PRESIDENT BIDEN AND KARINE JEAN-PIERRE'S MOST MEMORABLE BATTLES WITH THE PRESS OF 2022

Leading up to the Georgia Senate runoff in December, Jean-Pierre repeatedly refused to answer questions on whether Biden would travel to the Peach State before Election Day, citing the Hatch Act. Incumbent Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., notably refused to say whether he would campaign with Biden leading up to the runoff race.

Questions related to the president’s schedule, despite being related to a political campaign, can also be answered without violating the law, according to Painter, who described this line of response as "somewhat evasive."

"When you look at the Hatch Act, she can’t use her official position to promote his campaign or to attack an opponent," Painter said. 

Jean-Pierre can certainly provide information on the president’s whereabouts and the general nature of his activities, whether political or not, according to Painter.

A former Trump White House official told Fox News Digital that Jean-Pierre seems to want it both ways, using the Hatch Act to dodge campaign-related questions while making blatantly political statements about "ultra-MAGA" and "extreme MAGA" individuals — terms Biden started using in the lead-up to the 2022 midterms to describe some Republican candidates.

Jean-Pierre's caution may be based on a legitimate concern within the Biden White House. The Office of Special Counsel — which investigates potential Hatch Act violations — came down on Jean-Pierre's predecessor, Jen Psaki, for a Hatch Act violation during an October 2021 press briefing where she appeared to endorse former Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe in his gubernatorial race.

KARINE JEAN-PIERRE FACES BACKLASH AFTER CLAIMING THE BORDER IS NOT OPEN: ‘A BOLD-FACED LIE'

"Questions related to campaign issues are not necessarily ‘off the table,’ but an employee must take into account all the circumstances of the situation at hand to determine whether answering a question would constitute political activity," said Delaney Marsco, senior legal counsel at the Campaign Legal Center, a government watchdog group.

"To me, it makes sense that Karine Jean-Pierre is being careful when she weighs in on things that could be construed as political activity," Marsco told Fox.

As Biden mulls a potential reelection bid, telling reporters that he will announce his decision "early next year," White House reporters will likely hear more about the Hatch Act going forward.

"This White House believes in the rule of law, and we’ll continue to provide information to members of the media while working within the bounds of federal statutes," White House assistant press secretary Robyn Patterson told Fox.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"More broadly, when it comes to political campaigns and other political activity, we generally will continue to refer you to the DNC and relevant campaigns. If reporters have an issue with the Hatch Act, they have every right to petition their members of Congress to push for changes to the law," Patterson added.

A Florida couple opened a gift of the past on Christmas morning after their engagement ring, which had been missing for over 20 years, was found in a familiar spot a few days before.

Nick and Shaina Day, of Lakeland, Fla., were unwrapping presents on Dec. 25 when they couldn't believe their eyes – the ring they thought was gone forever was suddenly back in their hands.

Shaina told Fox 13 Tampa Bay she and Nick were newly engaged when she accidentally flushed her ring down the toilet at his parents house.

"I'd taken my ring off. It was sitting on the counter, so when I sopped up the water, I guess I didn't pay attention very well snagged my ring in the process and tossed it in the toilet and flushed it," she said.

AMAZING CHRISTMAS SURPRISE: WISCONSIN WAITRESS GETS $1,000 TIP

Understandably frantic, Shaina said she climbed down into the septic tank at the home of her now in-laws with a hose to suck everything up. Once she did that, she pumped it through a hose over a window screen and into a 55-gallon drum in hopes of catching the lost ring.

After all of that effort, the ring was nowhere to be found. Until last week when Nick's parents had to replace their toilet.

The ring reportedly fell out when the plumber unhooked the toilet from the ground and dumped the excess water into the tub to avoid it dripping throughout the house.

Nick's parents took the ring, wrapped it up in a miniature ceramic toilet and gifted it back to the couple on Christmas morning. They told Fox 13 they couldn't believe the ring was sitting in a toilet pipe all these years later.

NEBRASKA PIT BULL CAUGHT ON VIDEO HELPING OWNER WALK ACROSS ICY PATH

Nick said the sweet surprise brought tears to his and Shaina's eyes.

"To know that everyone cared enough about it and thought it was so cool that they didn't tell us it was an actual genuine surprise. It was." Nick said.

The ring was broken, but the diamond was still intact. After a cleaning, the ring is reportedly still shining just as bright as it was more than 20 years ago.

"That just is absolutely amazing that it's just been sitting there, because we had just thought it was gone. It was never coming back. It's hard to believe," Shaina said.

The couple said the ring is "now more meaningful than ever."