Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle were in agreement that political discourse in the United States has reached a startling level following the assassination of Charlie Kirk and other recent acts of political violence.
Kirk's assassination is the latest in a string of political violence that has left several high-profile figures dead or injured since July 2024, when President Donald Trump was shot while campaigning for his second term in Butler, Pennsylvania. Trump was targeted again by a would-be assassin just months later. In April, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro was the victim of an arson attack. And in June, two Minnesota lawmakers and their families were attacked, leaving two dead.
The political violence has had a chilling effect on the nation, with some lawmakers going so far as to cancel public appearances amid fears of physical violence.
"We have a climate right now where people who are frankly unhinged … like the two guys who tried to shoot President Trump, one who did shoot him, the person – whoever it is – who killed Charlie, the person who went after the Minnesota lawmakers – these people are nuts," Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., told Fox News Digital. "But they are egged on by a climate that says, ‘Hey, you know, it’s okay basically to go out and shoot your opponents because they're really Hitler.'"
The sentiment was echoed by Democratic lawmakers on the Hill as well.
"It's really sad and just scary, you know, honestly, just how dire things have gotten in this country in terms of our political discourse," said Sen. Andy Kim, D-N.J. "I was actually just remarking the other day how, in a survey, over 50% of Americans surveyed said that they would call people in the other political party ‘the enemy.’ I just think that's terrifying, that's so dangerous of a place for our country to be."
Democratic Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon added that in order for this Republic to work, people must be able to "passionately share [their] viewpoints and do so knowing that we resolve our differences through advocacy and voting, not through violence."
"I don't know what it says about political discourse, but it certainly says something about violence, and it has no business in political discourse. You can have a robust disagreement with people, but when it turns to violence, something's gone badly wrong," responded Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., when asked about what Kirk's death said about the current state of political discourse.
Kirk was known for engaging passionately, but also respectfully, with students of all political stripes on college campuses as part of Turning Point USA, the grassroots organization he co-founded in 2012. He would regularly visit college campuses all around the country and debate with students from different perspectives on various issues of the day. Oftentimes, Kirk would hold "Prove Me Wrong" events, where he would give students a chance to do just that – prove him wrong.
"I mean, that's the shame of this. Charlie Kirk was polite, he had a message, and he spread that message, and he engaged people to speak and debate, and then he lost his life for that," said Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky. "That's the thing about this country, we have freedom of speech. Nobody should ever take out violence based on something somebody said."
"I would hope that all people would take a moment, reflect, and bring down this political rhetoric," Rep. Jonathan Jackson, D-Ill., told Fox News Digital. "These violent words precede violent actions."
Hawley, meanwhile, suggested a tactic to help solve the issue.
"I'll just say again, part of the way we stop it, is we realize that there's stuff in life that's more important than politics," he told reporters.
