FBI warned Twitter of Hunter Biden ‘hack-and-leak operation’ before 2020 expose was censored

The FBI warned Twitter during weekly meetings prior to the 2020 election that the social media giant could expect "hack-and-leak operations" by "state actors" involving Hunter Biden, according to a declaration by Twitter’s former head of site integrity.

These warnings came ahead of Twitter censoring the New York Post's bombshell October 2020 report on Hunter Biden's business dealings found on his laptop, citing its "hacked materials" policy. At the time, the FBI had been in possession of his laptop for nearly a year.

"I was told in these meetings that the intelligence community expected that individuals associated with political campaigns would be subject to hacking attacks and that material obtained through those hacking attacks would likely be disseminated over social media platforms, including Twitter," Twitter’s former head of site integrity Yoel Roth said in a Dec. 21, 2020, declaration to the Federal Election Commission, according to the New York Post.

"I also learned in these meetings that there were rumors that a hack-and-leak operation would involve Hunter Biden," Roth continued.

HUNTER BIDEN LAPTOP REPAIRMAN TOUTS VINDICATION AFTER MUSK'S BOMBSHELL TWITTER REPORT: ‘I KNEW THE WHOLE TIME’

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg told podcast host Joe Rogan in August that the FBI had also warned his social media platform to be on "high alert" for "Russian propaganda" ahead of the 2020 election, and that the agency included language specific enough to "fit the pattern" of the Hunter Biden story.

The Hunter Biden story was also censored by Facebook in the weeks leading up to the 2020 election.

FBI Supervisory Special Agent Elvis Chan organized the meetings with the platforms. Chan testified Tuesday in a lawsuit against the Biden administration that he organized the meetings with Twitter in San Francisco for as many as seven DC-based FBI agents ahead of the 2020 presidential election. He also organized weekly meetings with Facebook. 

The lawsuit was filed by the GOP attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, and alleges that the federal government coordinated with technology giants to censor "disfavored speakers, viewpoints and content on social-media platforms."

Chan said in his testimony that the FBI warned Twitter to be prepared for a "hack and leak" operation, although he could not recall if Hunter Biden's name was mentioned. 

The latest revelations about FBI warnings to social media companies come after new Twitter CEO Elon Musk suggested Twitter engaged in "election interference" by censoring the Hunter Biden story.

"If Twitter is doing one team’s bidding before an election, shutting down dissenting voices on a pivotal election, that is the very definition of election interference … Frankly Twitter was acting like an arm of the Democratic National Committee. It was absurd," Musk said during a live Q&A session on Twitter Spaces on Saturday.

MUSK TEASES ‘ROUND 2’ OF TWITTER FILES SHOWING COMPANY SUPPRESSED HUNTER BIDEN LAPTOP

Musk had shared files with Substack journalist Matt Taibbi, who made a Twitter thread Friday revealing screenshots of emails showing that Twitter employees suspended, banned or censored users who commented on Hunter Biden's laptop.

And law firm Covington & Burling previously told the FEC that Twitter "had been warned throughout 2020 by federal law enforcement agencies to be on the alert for expected ‘hack-and-leak operations’ undertaken by malign state actors, in which those state actors might hack electronic communications of individuals associated with political campaigns and seek to disseminate the leaked materials."

"Reports from the law enforcement agencies even suggested there were rumors that such a hack-and-leak operation would be related to Hunter Biden," the law firm added.

Wall Street CEOs funding China’s military and human rights abuses. Here's why

Wall Street wants everyone to think they care about socially and morally responsible investing. They hope the latest "ESG" craze – which stands for Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance (ESG) – will fool lawmakers and the American people into believing that they care more about responsible investing than greedily making a profit.

There’s just one problem: It’s a farce.

If Wall Street really cared about "ESG," they wouldn’t turn a blind eye to China’s human rights abuses, genocide, and military aggression – just to make a profit.

Two of the biggest culprits are BlackRock CEO Larry Fink and JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon. Their two Wall Street firms publicly advertise "sustainable investing" efforts. And in recent years, they’ve revamped billions of dollars in investments into ESG funds. According to Morningstar, the value of these ESG funds has increased to nearly $300 billion since 2017.

CHINA PUTS THE WORLD AT MORE RISK THAN EVER BEFORE

In complete contrast to their public ESG rhetoric, however, BlackRock recommended last year that investors triple their investment in China because it "represents a significant opportunity to help meet the long-term goals of investors in China." In other words, BlackRock is willing to help the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) meet its goals in exchange for profit.

It’s time for Congress and the American people to see this charade for what it really is – funneling money to the CCP. That enables China to build a more modern, lethal military to threaten Taiwan, undermine U.S. national security, and subvert efforts for America to reduce its dependence on Chinese supply chains.

BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, has invested billions in China. And JPMorgan alone holds an estimated $20 billion worth of investments in China. However, the American people would certainly be disturbed to learn that many of these investment products are actually funneling U.S. investment to companies helping Beijing modernize its military.

For example, CSSC Holdings Ltd. (CSSC) – China’s largest builder of naval vessels – is listed in several major investment indices that contain literally trillions of dollars of assets. In fact, Beijing’s efforts to raise funds through capital markets has greatly benefited CSSC. The shipbuilding giant was able to raise $8.63 billion from debt markets by 2015, and has now launched China’s new warship – the "Fujian" aircraft carrier – intended to rival America’s largest and most advanced aircraft carrier.

CHINA'S ‘ZERO-COVID’POLICY COULD BE XI'S UNDOING

Much of this came to light during a recent congressional hearing. Dimon was specifically asked about his firm’s ties to China and what JPMorgan would do if China invaded Taiwan. Dimon and other CEOs eventually acknowledged that their companies would do as the U.S. government instructed if China attacked Taiwan – even if that meant halting business with Beijing.

The question, however, is why these firms would even want to do business with an authoritarian regime that has expressed an intention to invade Taiwan. And if that’s not troubling enough, China also continues to use slave labor in the Xinjiang region of Western China. In fact, it’s estimated that more than 80,000 ethnic Uyghurs were transferred out of Xinjiang to forced labor in factories across China between 2017 and 2019 alone.

Despite pressure from the Chinese government not to publish it, the United Nations recently released a report on China’s well-documented human rights abuses, including physical and mental torture, slave labor, rape, and forced sterilization. These crimes against humanity were a key focus of the recent congressional hearing with Wall Street CEOs. However, when pressed to condemn China’s human rights abuses, Jane Fraser, CEO of Citigroup, simply admitted to being "distressed" by China’s actions, saying that condemn "is a very strong word."

The bottom line here is profit. Wall Street’s pursuit of short-term gain comes at the expense of America’s future security. Congress should immediately require transparency and disclosure from index providers and fund managers – and prohibit sanctioned and bad-actor Chinese companies from being included in investment products such as Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) and mutual funds.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINION NEWSLETTER

Tens of millions of American retail investors hold the stocks and bonds of thousands of Chinese companies, primarily in ETFs and mutual funds. These include companies that have been sanctioned by the U.S. government for egregious human rights abuses and national security concerns, as well as companies that are aiding and abetting genocide, trafficking in slave labor, equipping concentration camps in Xinjiang, militarizing illegal islands in the South China Sea, constructing aircraft carriers, developing hypersonic glide vehicles, and manufacturing other advanced weapons systems for China’s military.

This massive investment is actively aiding the CCP’s efforts to undermine our nation. Putting a stop to this is common sense. Wall Street’s self-serving profit motive should no longer jeopardize America’s national security.