The Great Lion Enters Into His Rest

In 2020, as state authorities across the country were closing down churches and dictating worship practices — No singing! No more than fifty people! — my editor at a Christian magazine offered me an assignment. Would I interview renowned preacher John MacArthur, who at that time was making national headlines for opposing California Governor Gavin Newsom’s shutdown orders?

I could not have said “yes” faster.

My editor was unaware, but from the time I became a Christian some 20 years earlier, no public figure’s work had meant more to my life. No ministry had shaped me in greater ways than his international radio and podcast ministry, Grace to You. Like millions of other Christians around the world, his daily teachings had been the backdrop of mundane domestic tasks, long car rides, and sleepless nights. His books were the first resources I turned to when dealing with a crisis or trial. When I received a Stage 3 colon cancer diagnosis, his messages on suffering and prayer played through the wee hours, comforting me until I could catch a few hours of rest. When he sent me a message of personal encouragement, I told him that someday, it would be like showing my grandchildren a note I’d received from Charles Spurgeon. I laughed as I said it, but I wasn’t really joking.

They say you should never meet your heroes, the idea being that it will lead to inevitable disillusionment. I had the opposite experience with John MacArthur.

As we continued to correspond, my estimation of him grew deeper and richer. The man I spoke to privately was the same man whose public ministry I had followed so closely for so many years. His concern was always for faithful application of Scripture to any situation. And for souls. After I took a job with a conservative media company, every call I had with him included his urging me on to love and good works, especially to act as a Christian witness to any unbelieving coworkers and friends around me.

BEN SHAPIRO: A Tribute To John MacArthur, A Lion Who Was My Friend

Whether in debates on The Larry King Show or preaching from his pulpit, he never watered down the truth of Scripture to appeal to a general audience. His adherence to sound doctrine never wavered, and he never showed an ounce of reticence to preach the Word, clearly and plainly. Even in the bright glare of the secular media, he never equivocated on issues that are biblically true, but culturally unpopular.

So his staunch opposition to a government that thought it could claim jurisdiction over the practices of the church was no surprise. Nor was the open letter he wrote to Newsom, calling him to repentance.

Now, at his death at age 86, I cannot help but feel we have seen the last of the great lions pass out of the world. But I know, as Pastor John would’ve taught me, that the Lord does not leave himself without a witness. And He will raise up more teachers like Johnny Mac, as his dear friend, the great theologian R.C. Sproul, another of the great lions, used to call him.

On that note, I smile now to imagine the two of them reunited, their races now complete.

I thank the Lord for MacArthur’s legacy and that he now has the full joy of his salvation. And I live in the reassurance that, due in large part to his ministry, I will one day hear the words he is surely hearing now: well done, good and faithful servant.

House GOP Rejects Claims of Blocking Epstein Files: ‘A Misunderstanding’

House Republicans say there is “a misunderstanding” about the failed vote on Tuesday that Democrats linked to demanding the Department of Justice compile and release files regarding Jeffrey Epstein.

Democrats pledged to revive an Epstein disclosure amendment from Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) that was shot down Monday in the House Rules Committee after he sought to merge his measure with an unrelated crypto bill — if a procedural floor vote went their way. But it did not succeed.

While the result has been widely cast as the House Republicans uniting to prevent the release of the Epstein files, some GOP members pushed back on that narrative.

“I gotta correct something real quick,” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) said in a “Benny Show” interview. “It’s being reported that House Republicans unanimously voted to block the release of the Epstein files, and I want to straighten out the record right now. That is not true. If I could vote … to release the Epstein files, guys, you would have my vote. I would vote ‘yes.'”

Greene spoke about the mechanics of what happened.

“It was a procedural vote. And we have these all the time. It’s called a ‘PQ.’ It’s voting on the previous question,” Greene said. “If the Democrats had won the previous question, which I know sounds insane — it’s one of these crazy rules in the House that are hard to understand — that means they would control the House floor.”

The congresswoman then contended that if Democrats had gotten their way, it could have paved the way to all sorts of votes beyond the Epstein issue.

“And that means they could bring up anything,” Greene said. “They could bring up impeachment articles against President Trump. They could bring up a whole package of insane Democrat agenda items and force votes on the House floor on these things. That’s what we voted against. We never allow Democrats to have control of the House floor because we control the House floor. So, it’s a misunderstanding that I just wanted to straighten that out.”

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) issued a similar explanation in a post on X.

“The House GOP conference as a whole did not vote to block the release of the Epstein files,” Luna said. “There was a procedural vote that, if failed, would have given Democrats control of the House. If you pull up the ‘previous question’ language you will not find anything re: Epstein. Liars never cease to disgust me.”

In response, Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA) claimed Luna was not entirely correct.

“Respectfully, [Luna], this is not accurate. If you pull up the ‘previous question’ language in tomorrow’s congressional record you will find the following, which you voted against,” McGovern said, sharing a screenshot of text on the Epstein files amendment.

Khanna’s amendment did get the support of a single Republican — Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC) — in the House Rules Committee, but the rest of the Republicans voted “nay” and it was defeated.

The California Democrat later clarified that his measure pertaining to Epstein, a wealthy financier and convicted sex offender who was found dead at the age of 66 in his New York City jail cell in 2019 after being arrested on sex trafficking charges involving young girls, would “of course protect” the identity of any victims.

President Donald Trump has expressed support for Attorney General Pam Bondi and seemed to dismiss the uproar within the “Make America Great Again” movement after the Department of Justice claimed it had no evidence that Epstein had a client list, blackmailed powerful people, or was murdered.

“One year ago our Country was DEAD, now it’s the ‘HOTTEST’ Country anywhere in the World. Let’s keep it that way, and not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about,” Trump said on Truth Social.

Still, there are many people who remain skeptical that the Department of Justice is being completely forthcoming.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) said in a separate “Benny Show” interview on Tuesday that he supports “transparency” with regard to the Epstein issue and called on Bondi to be more forthcoming to inform the American public what happened after she hinted earlier this year that major bombshells were about to be revealed that never materialized.

About Us

Virtus (virtue, valor, excellence, courage, character, and worth)

Vincit (conquers, triumphs, and wins)