Fat Acceptance Activist Insists Childhood Obesity Isn’t A Problem After All — That’s Just White Supremacy

De-stigmatizing obesity for kids may be the newest frontier of the fat acceptance movement.

At least, that’s the goal of author Virginia Sole-Smith. Her new book “Fat Talk: Parenting in the Age of Diet Culture” advocates for parents learning to embrace their overweight children just the way they are. She also believes in letting kids eat whatever they want, including candy and sweets, without forcing them to try vegetables or enjoy balanced meals of traditionally healthy foods.

The author, who describes herself as an “anti-diet journalist,” spoke with The Cut about some of her thoughts on kids and diet. In the article titled “What If You Weren’t Scared of Your Kid Being Fat?” Sole-Smith said that one of the most common questions parents ask is how often their kids should be able to eat certain foods. Using the example of ice cream, she gave her usual response. 

“There are seven days in a week. Your child can have ice cream seven days a week. There is no law against this,” she said, while insisting that if a parent inquired over their teenager asking for an entire box of Oreo cookies, her response would be, “Pour a glass of milk — so they can dunk them?”

The 41-year-old mother of two makes the argument that limiting certain foods just makes them more appealing to kids. Her approach assumes that children learn self-control by not having any rules at all, thereby making sugary treats less exciting. 

“Vegetables are the least important part of it to me,” she told the publication. “They have their whole lives to decide if they want to eat kale.” Sole-Smith also described some of the dinner rules at her house, which include, “No pressure/Listen to your body” and “You don’t have to earn dessert.”

Sole-Smith attempts to “debunk” the childhood obesity epidemic in the United States by arguing that society’s fear of fatness could be more detrimental than minors being overweight. “The real danger to a child in a larger body is how we treat them for having that body,” she writes in “Fat Talk.”

The fat acceptance activist’s arguments are similar to those made by individuals promoting “transgender rights” for children. They say that kids should be able to tell us who they are, no matter how young they are. But these adults seem to ignore the fact that they are meant to be the ones in charge.

Children learn eating habits from their parents. Parents and other trusted adults have traditionally served as guides to show children how to exist in the world. Minors literally don’t have the mental capacity to understand the long-term effects of eating cookies for dinner every night. That’s why there are age restrictions on certain activities, such as getting tattoos and purchasing alcohol. It’s also why up until now, most everyone agreed that parents should promote good eating habits for their children. 

Sole-Smith thinks kids should be running the show and that everyone should be more accepting of overweight people because ultimately, their mental health trumps the physical risks of being obese. 

Meanwhile, the CDC called childhood obesity a “serious problem” which leads to problems including “high blood pressure, high cholesterol, type 2 diabetes, breathing problems such as asthma and sleep apnea, and joint problems.” They reported that 19.7% of children aged 2 to 19 were classified as obese according to BMI charts. That’s 14.7 million children and adolescents who could face health problems due to their weight.

This week, Sole-Smith went on NPR’s “Fresh Air” podcast to promote her new book and further explain her pro-obesity stance. She said that the pursuit of weight loss is rooted in white supremacy.

“The thin ideal is definitely a white ideal. When we trace the history of modern diet culture, we really trace it back in the United States to the end of slavery,” Sole-Smith told host Tonya Mosley.

“Obviously, white supremacy is trying to maintain the power structure. So celebrating a thin white body as the ideal body is a way to ‘other’ and demonize black and brown bodies, bigger bodies, anyone who doesn’t fit into that norm. So this is really about maintaining systems of white supremacy and patriarchy.”

“If you can understand that, actually, by continuing to pursue thinness you are on some level, maintaining your complicity with white supremacy and patriarchy,” she continued.

Sole-Smith said that fat people are discriminated against in the same way that other minority groups experience “racism or other forms of bias.”

“We as a culture have really zeroed in on weight, because we think that’s the piece that we should be able to control. But not only do we not have very much control over weight, it also won’t fix anything else,” the author told NPR. “All it really ends up doing is pathologizing kids’ bodies and giving parents extra pressure and extra guilt and these sort of unrealistic standards we can’t get to.”

The author used to write weight loss stories for women’s magazines such as Glamour. Her perspective on childhood diets changed after her one-month-old daughter experienced medical trauma and had to be put on a feeding tube.

Sole-Smith told The Cut that the ordeal led her to decide that “obsessing over it doesn’t fix it — it makes it worse.” Following that experience, the author decided to let her two children make their own nutrition choices. “It’s the power to say no, to be curious and try new things, and to decide when and how much they want to eat,” she explained of her approach.

As more and more people advocate for fat acceptance, it’s only a matter of time before activists decide that overweight kids existing on a diet of candy and soda should just be left to live as they please. Who are we to judge?

Bill O’Reilly: Tucker Won, Fox News Did Carlson ‘A Favor’ In Firing

When Tucker Carlson was unceremoniously dumped by Fox News on Monday, the general feeling floating around was, “Oh, woe is he.”

But former Fox News star Bill O’Reilly, who was also fired by the network but for a real reason, said Fox did Carlson “a favor.”

“He’ll make a lot of clams,” O’Reilly said Wednesday on WMAL, a Washington, D.C., radio station.

And he offered some speculation on what prompted Carlson’s firing.

“Litigation was the reason,” he said. “There are a number of lawsuits pending and then more coming, where Mr. Carlson is going to be involved, particularly the one where he had a spy in his organization and she taped him and his staff and filed a suit in Manhattan. And the lawyer representing her, I understand, is, you know, saying, ‘Well, if you don’t pay us a lot of money, we’re gonna’ release the tapes,’” he said.

Former senior booking producer Abby Grossberg has reportedly filed two separate suits, accusing Carlson and Fox of sexism and harassment and alleging that his show’s workplace was rife with misogyny.

The suits come after Fox settled a defamation lawsuit by an election technology company for more than $787 million. Dominion Voting Systems sued over segments promoting bogus claims that election fraud cheated then-President Donald Trump of victory in 2020.

O’Reilly said workplace lawsuits are now commonplace.

“It’s an industry now,” he said. “What happens is you’re an employee, you don’t like where you’re working, you set up a taping apparatus to try to get anything, and then you hire a lawyer, and they come in and claim whatever they want to claim. So this is happening every hour on the hour all across the United States.”

“There are lawyers lined up to do this. Most of these cases are settled and nobody even knows about them. But this one is very high profile,” he said. And the accuser often comes out on top. O’Reilly predicts Grossberg could receive “between $10 and $15 million.”

O’Reilly’s career as the top-rated host in cable news came to a humiliating end in 2017 as Fox News fired him following the disclosure of a series of sexual harassment allegations against him. An internal probe turned up more problems.

But since then, he has built a successful independent career, running a daily podcast on Apple — Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis — and penning books. He reportedly makes $30 million a year.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP

O’Reilly said Carlson, who reportedly earned up to $20 million a year at Fox, is poised to create his own independent operation.

“Carlson is a talented broadcaster. He’s got a big following. He’ll go into the independent news or analysis industry, of which I started six years ago. Ironically, it was to the week six years ago that I left Fox News. And he’ll make a bloody fortune. Because he’s interesting to listen to,” O’Reilly said.

“They did him a favor. I mean, my life is so much better now than it was six years ago when I had to deal with all this stuff. They did him a favor. He’s gonna make a lot of money,” O’Reilly said.

“Look, billoreilly.com is the most successful independent news agency in the world. Now, you’ll never see that written in the Washington Post or anything like that because they despise me. But we built this from nothing into this colossus, this worldwide news organization. And I’ve never, you know, I would have people ask, ‘Would you go back?’ No, no. I don’t want to work for anybody anymore. I don’t want to put up with all the corporate BS, which is like up to your eyebrows.”

The views expressed in this piece are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Joseph Curl has covered politics for 35 years, including 12 years as White House correspondent for a national newspaper. He was also the a.m. editor of the Drudge Report for four years. Send tips to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and follow him on Twitter @josephcurl.