Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall told U.S. lawmakers this week that China’s rapid build up of nuclear weapons was the most “disturbing” thing that he’s ever seen in his 50-year career in the defense industry.

Kendall made the remarks while testifying to the House Defense Appropriations Committee hearing on Tuesday over the rising threats that the U.S. is facing from communist China.

“I don’t think I’ve seen anything more disturbing in my career than the Chinese ongoing expansion of their nuclear force,”  said Kendall. “For decades, they were quite comfortable with an arsenal of a few hundred nuclear weapons, which was fairly clearly a second-strike capability to act as a deterrent.”

“That expansion that they’re undertaking puts us into a new world that we’ve never lived in before, where you have three powers — three great powers, essentially — with large arsenals of nuclear weapons,” Kendall said in reference to the U.S., Russia, and China having large nuclear arsenals.”

China has rapidly increased the size and sophistication of their military in recent years, including developing the most advanced hypersonic missiles in the world and building scores of nuclear missile silos deep inside the country.

Kendall said that the primary threat that the Air Force and Space Force are worried about is “China, China, China.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP

Kendall said that the U.S. must develop and deploy new cutting-edge weapons systems to “maintain the air and space superiority that America and our allies have counted on for decade.”

“In order to proceed with any of these programs, the Department of the Air Force needs timely authorizations and appropriations,” he said. “War [with China] is not inevitable. But successfully deterring conflict is heavily dependent on our military capabilities.”

“Russia’s latest move on the New START treaty is not helping — it’s going in the wrong direction,” Kendall said. “Nobody wants a nuclear war. We do not want to go back to that [Cold War] world of 30 years ago. I thought we would never be in this position again, and here we are. So, we need to be wise. We really need to start talking to them.”

Related: DeSantis Tackles China: ‘Biggest Threat’ To U.S., Won’t Tolerate Invasion Of Taiwan, ‘Would’ Ban TikTok

Daily Wire host Candace Owens blasted affirmative action policies as “harmful” and degrading during an appearance on “Dr. Phil” Wednesday. 

Owens, appearing alongside two professors defending the controversial policies, turned the traditional narrative — that affirmative action helps minorities — on its head. Instead, she said such policies amounted to nothing more than a “burden of responsibility” for the Left, and often do more harm than good. 

“When you artificially place a black American into a school in which they do not belong based on their knowledge, it doesn’t mean that they go on to get A’s,” Owens said. “In fact, there was a black adjunct professor, you guys have definitely heard of him, Dr. Thomas Sowell, who was teaching at Cornell University and he found that the majority of the black American students that were there were on academic probation,” she added. 

Owens went on to explain that, while these students were some of the smartest in the nation, they found themselves on academic probation because they were artificially placed in positions they hadn’t been required to earn. The tangible results of affirmative action, she said, were often not successful minorities but politicians or administrators who claimed victory for policies that only made people “feel good.”  

In reality, Owens said affirmative action advocates often harm to the same people the policies allege to help. In the end “you either know the answers or you don’t,” she said. 

Panel member Dr. John Pascarella, professor and chief academic officer for the race and equity center at the University of Southern California, advocated for affirmative action specifically for “institutions that have historically excluded people of color.” 

Owens asked Pascarella how he could hold that viewpoint when she and others point to affirmative action being “factually, in effect, a bad thing for the black community,” to which the professor asks if the factors that create success are solely due to race. 

“No, it’s due to their intellectual capabilities, which is how students should be judged,” Owens said, adding that judging on merit is the real “equal policy,” for students, not affirmative action. 

Owens asserted that even the premise behind affirmative action was degrading, saying that the people who supported it were, in effect, claiming that minorities were incapable of achieving certain objectives without help from mostly white benefactors.

“I don’t think Sasha and Malia Obama are people that have struggled, and therefore should be allowed to get into the college, universities on a higher basis than white kids that have worked harder than them,” Owens continued. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP

Dr. J. Luke Wood, a professor at San Diego State University, pushed back on Owens’s comments, arguing that poor performance by affirmative action beneficiaries could be the result of their experiences at the institutions. 

“You’re saying ‘could be,’ I’m giving you actual facts,” Owens shot back. “We can fantasize and say ‘maybe they just don’t feel good,’ but that’s not the case.”

“We’re talking about a cultural problem, what’s going on back at home, as was in my circumstance,” Owens said. “None of that is because of institutionalized policy.”

WATCH: