Director and new DC Studios co-head James Gunn responded on Tuesday to backlash over some of the early decisions that he and fellow co-head Peter Safran had made — namely the decisions not to move ahead with the third installment in the “Wonder Woman” franchise and not to bring back actor Henry Cavill as Superman.

Both decisions — coupled with the news that Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson’s “Black Adam” would not have a continuing storyline in the DC Universe — raised eyebrows and angered fans alike, but Gunn made it clear that he and Safran were prepared to face the consequences of their decisions.

It's official, James Gunn is the Grinch of 2022. 😂
– No Wonder Woman 3
– No more Henry Cavill as Superman
– and now THE ROCK just got Jabroni'd https://t.co/OBKuqOCqbE

— TheresaRockFace (@TheresaRockFace) December 21, 2022

Gunn laid out his thought process in a lengthy Twitter thread, explaining that while he and Safran both understood that not all of the decisions they made would be popular, they intended to always move forward with what they believed was best for the studio and stayed true to the characters that had been around for decades.

“One of the things Peter & I were aware of when we took the job as heads of DC Studios was a certain minority of people online that could be, well, uproarious & unkind, to say the least,” Gunn began, noting that they had expected backlash and that they were prepared for it to be unpleasant.

Our choices for the DCU are based upon what we believe is best for the story & best for the DC characters who have been around for nearly 85 years. Perhaps these choices are great, perhaps not, but they are made with sincere hearts & integrity & always with the story in mind.

— James Gunn (@JamesGunn) December 19, 2022

He went on to explain that backlash, however unkind, would not deter them from doing what they believed was best when it came to honoring the characters’ history and moving the stories forward. He also conceded that they were well aware of the possibility that they could make mistakes in that effort.

“Our choices for the DCU are based upon what we believe is best for the story & best for the DC characters who have been around for nearly 85 years. Perhaps these choices are great, perhaps not, but they are made with sincere hearts & integrity & always with the story in mind,” he said.

Gunn went on to note that however prepared they were for complaints and social media uproar, that did not change the fact that it could be hurtful. “No one loves to be harassed or called names — but to be frank, we’ve been through significantly worse. Disrespectful outcry will never, ever affect our actions.”

We were aware there would be a period of turbulence when we took this gig, & we knew we would sometimes have to make difficult & not-so-obvious choices, especially in the wake of the fractious nature of what came before us.

— James Gunn (@JamesGunn) December 19, 2022

“We were aware there would be a period of turbulence when we took this gig,” Gunn added, noting that some of the choices they were making might be “not-so-obvious” to the fans, at least at face value, and that they were prepared to move forward with them regardless.

Gunn’s overall assessment was that the backlash came with the territory — and in the grand scheme of things, was less important than making sure that DC Studios had a solid path forward.

“This means little to us in comparison to our jobs as artists & custodians in helping to create a wide & wonderful future for DC.,” he said.

Months after his return from combat, actor James “Jimmy” Stewart was still adrift — unmoored in the Hollywood he had previously called home, living with fellow veteran Henry Fonda, and waiting for film offers that just weren’t coming in.

After a couple of months had gone by, director Frank Capra — who had worked with Stewart before in 1936’s “You Can’t Take It With You” — first pitched “It’s a Wonderful Life.” A meeting was set, and Capra described the story to Stewart and his agent Lew Wasserman.

Stewart, who had been adamant about doing a comedy upon his return to Hollywood, was reportedly taken aback at first. “You want me to do what?” he asked, and according to Capra’s notes walked out of his initial pitch meeting. But Capra believed in the strength of the story — and he was equally adamant that Stewart was not just the right person to play George Bailey, he was the only person who could do it.

Stewart eventually sat down to listen to Capra’s pitch in full, and he recalled the director’s awkward description of the story in a 1987 interview for Guideposts.

“‘Now, listen,’ Frank began hesitantly. He seemed a little embarrassed. ‘The story starts in heaven, and it’s sort of the Lord telling somebody to go down to earth because there’s a fellow who’s in trouble, and this heavenly being goes to a small town, and … Well, what it boils down to is, this fella who thinks he’s a failure in life jumps off a bridge. The Lord sends down an angel named Clarence, who hasn’t earned his wings yet, and Clarence jumps into the water to save the guy. But the angel can’t swim, so the guy has to save him, and then … This doesn’t tell very well, does it?'”

The actor said his response was simple: “Frank, if you want to do a picture about a guy who jumps off a bridge and an angel named Clarence who hasn’t won his wings yet coming down to save him, well, I’m your man!”

“It’s a Wonderful Life”, directed by Frank Capra. Seen here from left, Henry Travers as Clarence and James Stewart as George Bailey. CBS via Getty Images

For Capra and Stewart both, the film was a do or die project. For Stewart, it was his chance to prove that he still had something to give to fans. And Capra — who had also been away from Hollywood making movies for the War Department — believed so much in the story that he put everything on the line, even forming a new independent studio (Liberty Films) to produce it. But making the film was not without its difficulties. As actress Donna Reed — who played Mary Bailey to Stewart’s George Bailey — put it, “This was not a happy set.”

At one point, an agitated Stewart complained about the superficiality of Hollywood and acting in general, prompting veteran actor Lionel Barrymore — who plays the movie’s villain Mr. Henry F. Potter — to scold him: “So, are you saying it’s more worthwhile to drop bombs on people than to entertain them?”

“It’s a Wonderful Life”, directed by Frank Capra. Seen here from left, Lionel Barrymore as Henry F. Potter, Frank Hagney (in background) as Potter’s Bodyguard and James Stewart as George Bailey. Photo by CBS via Getty Images

As Matzen explained in a 2016 interview with The Chicago Tribune, Stewart appeared to funnel all the bottled up rage, anxiety, anger, fear, and frustration into the role — making his portrayal of a man on the brink truly blur the line between fiction and reality.

“There’s a scene in the movie where he questions his sanity and he’s got this wild look about him. That’s one scene that really struck me, watching it on the big screen. And the other scene that always made me uncomfortable, but now means so much more to me, is when he’s in his living room and he’s throwing things and screaming at his kids — and his wife and children look at him like, ‘Who is this man? Who is this monster?'” Matzen explained. “And that is so reflective of what millions of families faced, looking at these strangers who came back from the war with this rage. Stewart played it beautifully. He just lets it out.”

Stewart recalled a similar moment in the Guideposts interview, when George Bailey turned to God in desperation — completely unaware that his entire town was also praying for him in the same moment.

“In agony I raise my eyes and, following the script, plead, ‘God … God … dear Father in heaven, I’m not a praying man, but if you’re up there and you can hear me, show me the way. I’m at the end of my rope. Show me the way, God …'” Stewart said, adding, “As I said those words, I felt the loneliness, the hopelessness of people who had nowhere to turn, and my eyes filled with tears. I broke down sobbing. This was not planned at all, but the power of that prayer, the realization that our Father in heaven is there to help the hopeless, had reduced me to tears.”

Capra, who loved spontaneity in his films, kept the powerful moment in the final cut — he even sacrificed some of the film quality to turn a wide shot into a close-up so that the audience could better see “George Bailey’s” pain.

The film was a resounding flop when it was released in 1947 — bringing in less than half of the expected box office haul — but still managed to impress the Academy. In addition to two technical nominations, Stewart received another Best Actor nod, Capra was nominated for directing, and the film was nominated for Best Picture. All five lost — and Capra’s newly-formed studio Liberty Films quickly went under.

“It’s a Wonderful Life”, directed by Frank Capra. Seen here from left, Donna Reed as Mary Hatch Bailey, James Stewart as George Bailey and Karolyn Grimes as Zuzu. CBS via Getty Images

“By the end of 1947 the film was quietly put on the shelf,” Stewart recalled, adding, “But a curious thing happened. The movie refused to stay on the shelf. Those who loved it loved it a lot, and they told others. They wouldn’t let it die any more than the angel Clarence would let George Bailey die. When it began to be shown on TV, a whole new audience fell in love with it.”

The fact that the movie appeared on television was actually the result of a probable clerical error that resulted in Republic Pictures — who owned the rights after Liberty Films collapsed — failing to apply for a copyright renewal in 1974. Because it was public domain, television studios quickly added it to their holiday line-ups. A Supreme Court decision nearly two decades later determined that the owner of the short story it was based on — “The Greatest Gift” — actually owned the copyright, and to this day, NBC is the only network licensed to show the movie on television.

But those twenty years meant that millions of people saw that film — and many of them came to love it and come back to it every year.

Stewart explained that he believed the thing that had truly resonated with the audience was the thing that had resonated with him all those years ago — revealing that of the 80-or-so films he had made in his career, “It’s a Wonderful Life” remained his favorite.

“Today, after some 40 years, I’ve heard the film called an American cultural phenomenon,'” Stewart told Guideposts. “Well, maybe so, but it seems to me there is nothing phenomenal about the movie itself. It’s simply about an ordinary man who discovers that living each ordinary day honorably, with faith in God and a selfless concern for others, can make for a truly wonderful life.”