Why The Oscars Can’t Give ‘Top Gun’ Too Much Credit For ‘Saving Hollywood’s A**’

The film that saved “Hollywood’s a**” was rewarded for its heroism with a paltry Oscar for Best Sound at The 95th Academy Awards Sunday night.

So why did “Top Gun: Maverick” get burnt by The Academy despite its high-flying success? Well, Hollywood bigwigs cannot openly give too much credit to the highest-grossing film of 2022 for its success; Doing so would admit that their anti-American and woke crusade has been an abject failure that has hurt their bottom dollar.

Ultimately, leftists can never admit they were wrong about a topic because doing so would weaken their power — whether that be cultural or political. The reality is that the audience does not want to go to movies for a lecture and forced diversity — they want to be enthralled by the magic of film and a cinematic experience.

“Maverick” hauled in $719 million at the box office last year. The instant classic received rave reviews, including from the legendary producer/director Steven Spielberg, who recently told Tom Cruise at the 2023 Oscar Luncheon, “You saved Hollywood’s a**, and you might have saved theatrical distribution.”

“Seriously, ‘Maverick’ might have saved the entire theatrical industry,” he emphasized.

TOM CRUISE SAVED the entire movie industry with Top Gun Maverick, according to Steven Spielberg.

"You Saved Hollywood's A**"

Spielberg told Cruise at the Oscar luncheon, Top Gun 2 saved the theatrical distribution business, likely because he produced a traditional film that… https://t.co/QI8jYaF18Z pic.twitter.com/opvwooB76q

— Mr. Cardinal Truth (@mrcardinaltruth) February 15, 2023

So why didn’t a film like that experience more success Sunday night?

Its critics would say that the film is too pro-America, too anti-Chinese, and too pro-military. All things that Hollywood — Hollyweird as some people like to call it — despise.

To admit that a masculine movie of that caliber is popular — unifying even — would be to admit that the American people do not welcome their message — no matter how hard they try.

Detractors would say that the film is simply Pentagon propaganda. Maybe so. But that’s still more fun than the woke propaganda we typically get out of Tinseltown.

Better yet, everybody going into the movie understood what they were getting — an entertaining experience displaying good ol’ U-S-of-A bravado. That is a better sell than the usual mental rot of diversity, equity, and inclusion snuck into movies, if not the central plot device.

Again, that lesson can never be outright admitted in Hollywood; Dissent is never tolerated by the Left. As documented in numerous instances, if you dissent and offer even a semi-conservative viewpoint, then you are treated like an outcast.

Yet thanks to the near-universal praise of “Maverick” from outside leftist circles, Hollywood execs were reminded that “there’s money on the table” for movies such as “Maverick,” The Federalist’s Emily Jashinsky observed. As she put it, Hollywood was reminded of the “monocultural magic” films can hold and their ability to attract customers.

As a result, the Oscars show was relatively scant on politics. The entire gambit, Jashisnky concluded, might be too late to save the industry.

Whether that is true remains to be seen.

Yet, one thing that is evident is that, like so many industries infected by leftist politics, Hollywood cannot humble itself to admit that it has failed because of its ideology. For now, it seems that if wokeness is going to end in Hollywood, it will go out not with a bang, but with a whimper.

The views expressed in this piece are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Dem Senator Asked About Censoring Info That Would Cause Bank Run, Massie Says

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) said Sunday that at least one Democrat senator wanted to censor what information is available to the public in the wake of Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse last week.

In a tweet Sunday, Massie said an unnamed Democrat senator had asked what options the government has to censor information that could cause a run on the banks.

“Just got off of a zoom meeting with Fed, Treasury, FDIC [Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation], House, and Senate,” Massie tweeted.

Just got off of a zoom meeting with Fed, Treasury, FDIC, House, and Senate.

A Democrat Senator essentially asked whether there was a program in place to censor information on social media that could lead to a run on the banks.

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) March 13, 2023

“A Democrat Senator essentially asked whether there was a program in place to censor information on social media that could lead to a run on the banks,” Massie added.

Silicon Valley Bank, a popular bank for U.S. tech startups, faced a sudden bank run on Friday. The crisis spiraled into the largest American bank failure since 2008.

The chaos kicked off on Wednesday when Silicon Valley Bank announced that it had sold a large amount of securities, losing $1.8 billion, and was planning to sell $2.25 billion in new shares to offset the loss.

This caused venture capital firms to reportedly recommend companies take their money out of the bank. The bank’s customers attempted to withdraw about $42 billion, and the bank ran out of cash.

Over the course of Thursday, the bank’s stock nosedived 60%.

The panic began to spread beyond Silicon Valley Bank on Thursday. Investors using other banks started to withdraw their money as well, worrying that a crisis similar to 2008 was beginning. This caused those banks’ stock to sink too.

On Friday morning, trading of Silicon Valley Bank’s shares was halted, and California regulators shut down the bank about 48 hours after the crisis began.

SVB was 40 years old and the 16th-largest U.S. bank before it was shuttered.

Massie said the response to the Democrat senator’s question was, “We will get back to you on that.”

Massie also responded to a Twitter user who commented that while they are anti-censorship, “spreading unfounded rumors to promote a run on a bank” is akin to “yelling fire in a crowded theater.”

“What about yelling fire in a theater that’s on fire?” Massie replied.

Censorship has become a flashpoint in the political debate over the last several years, especially in the wake of the 2020 election and the pandemic. The Biden administration pressured social media companies to censor information about COVID that bucked the mainstream line of thought. Last month, House Republicans grilled former Twitter employees about whether the FBI pressured the company to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story ahead of the 2020 election.

On Monday, President Joe Biden promised taxpayers would not shoulder the cost of Silicon Valley Bank’s failure.

“No losses will be — and this is an important point — no losses will be borne by the taxpayers; let me repeat that, no losses will be borne by the taxpayer,” Biden said at the White House. 

“Instead the money will come from the fees that banks pay into the Deposit Insurance Fund,” Biden said.

Silicon Valley Bank’s customers will have access to their money on Monday, Biden said.

About Us

Virtus (virtue, valor, excellence, courage, character, and worth)

Vincit (conquers, triumphs, and wins)