Dogs of War: Two British Volunteers in Ukraine Allegedly Killed by Fellow Mercs

Former Scots Guard Jordan Chadwick was found dead in Ukraine in June

 

British volunteer Jordan Chadwick, 31, a military vet who worked for a secretive unit called 50/50 attached to Ukraine’s GUR military intelligence, was apparently tortured and killed by another Brit, the Daily Telegraph reports.

“Jordan Chadwick, 31, was found dead in a body of water with his hands tied behind his back in June,” The Sun reports: “His terrified comrades have named another British fighter as a prime suspect.”

“They claim Chadwick, from Burnley, UK was waterboarded and the water in his lungs was not the same as where he was found in Kramatorsk, around 20 miles from the Bakhmut front line”, The Sun writes.

Ukrainian police also found a second Brit’s body, believed to be Daniel Burke, 36, a former paratrooper from Manchester who went missing last month. Burke is believed to have been shot and buried in a shallow grave outside Zaporizhzhia, about 44 km from the frontline, where some of the most intense fighting has been taking place.

Comrades fear “the men may have been killed not by the Russians they had come to fight but by fellow foreign volunteers”, The Telegraph reports. “In Mr. Burke’s case, police are examining claims of a dispute over money and vehicles. In Chadwick’s case, reports have circulated that he was killed either during a petty argument or during a military “initiation” ceremony that went wrong.”

“There are guys who shouldn’t be here – some with criminal records, some with PTSD, and some with drug and alcohol problems or who use steroids,” a volunteer told The Telegraph.

The Russian military estimates that nearly 5,000 foreign fighters have been killed in Ukraine, with 4,900 more fleeing the country, and about 2,000 remaining in the country to fight.

The post Dogs of War: Two British Volunteers in Ukraine Allegedly Killed by Fellow Mercs appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Obama Judge Tanya Chutkan Previously Called January 6 “An Armed Attempted Overthrow of This Government”

How is this woman allowed to oversee Trump’s January 6 trial?

Yet another prejudicial courtroom statement made by Judge Tanya Chutkan in a January 6 case has been unearthed as Trump demands she recuse herself from his January 6 case.

Julie Kelly obtained a transcript of another sentencing by Judge Chutkan for a J6er where she brazenly lied about the Capitol protest.

Judge Chutkan during her sentencing brazenly lied about the January 6 Capitol riot and called it an “armed attempted overthrow of this government.”

NEW CHUTKAN FILES: I just obtained transcript of another sentencing by Judge Chutkan for a J6er, convicted by her of 4 misdemeanors after a brief bench trial. To say her view of what happened on January 6 is misinformed in an understatement.

It’s not hyperbole, it’s a lie: pic.twitter.com/pwxEjeLgBp

— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) September 18, 2023

Judge Chutkan said lawmakers who were inside the Capitol on January 6 looked outside and saw “gallows being erected.”

This never happened. There is no video evidence to back up this absurd claim.

After admitting she watched J6 select committee hearings–and asking a defendant if he had, lol–Chutkan compares Jan 6 to Game of Thrones.

And no one saw anyone erecting gallows. There is no video of it–and I've been trying to hunt it down for 2 years with no luck. pic.twitter.com/KVQCEh4qNe

— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) September 18, 2023

Judge Chutkan also said January 6 protesters tried to violently overthrow the government.

She has already made up her mind on January 6 and yet she is allowed to preside over Trump’s January 6 trial where the former president is facing four federal counts: Conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights.

President Trump’s attorneys last week filed a motion in a DC federal court calling for Judge Tanya Chutkan, an Obama appointee, to recuse herself from Trump’s January 6 case brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith.

One example of a disqualifying statement per the motion filed last week:

In October 2022, before the Special Counsel’s appointment or the filing of this case, Judge Chutkan stated:

“This was nothing less than an attempt to violently overthrow the government, the legally, lawfully, peacefully elected government by individuals who were mad that their guy lost. I see the videotapes. I see the footage of the flags and the signs that people were carrying and the hats they were wearing and the garb. And the people who mobbed that Capitol were there in fealty, in loyalty, to one man — not to the Constitution, of which most of the people who come before me seem woefully ignorant; not to the ideals of this country; and not to the principles of democracy. It’s a blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day.” United States v. Christine Priola 1:22-cr-242, ECF #66 at 29:17–30:3 (sentencing transcript) (emphasis added) (relevant portions attached as Ex. A).

Judge Tanya Chutkan is treating President Trump worse than other defendants – including a meth dealer.

Noted attorney Techno Fog looked through Judge Chutkan’s recent history and provided evidence of bias after she denied the gag order hearing dates requested by Trump’s lawyers.

She gave the meth dealer a 1 week deadline to respond to a protective order.

The judge also set the hearing 2 weeks out after it was submitted, according to Techno Fog.

In contrast, Judge Chutkan gave Trump only ONE DAY to respond to a request for a protective order.

This is clear evidence of bias.

Mark Levin made an excellent case in favor of Tanya Chutkan’s recusal last week and said she is “unqualified” to preside over Jack Smith’s case against Trump:

The post Obama Judge Tanya Chutkan Previously Called January 6 “An Armed Attempted Overthrow of This Government” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.