PURE EVIL: Pelosi Who Supports Abortion Up to Birth – Smears Trump Supporters for Not Respecting “Dignity and Worth of Every Person”

There’s a special place in hell for this one.
Earlier today Kristinn Taylor reported on Nancy Pelosi’s vile attacks against Trump and Trump supporters.

Pelosi accused the 75 million strong Trump supporters of not respecting the “dignity and worth of every person.”

Pelosi Trashes Trump: “Cancerous…Malignancy”, and His Supporters: “They don’t share our values in terms of respect for the dignity and worth of every person”

Here is what Nancy Pelosi says about conservatives.

Nancy Pelosi smears Americans who voted for President Trump: “They’re people we would probably never get” pic.twitter.com/k9SblmNTxh

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) September 1, 2023

Of course, Pelosi was out gaslighting the masses once again.

Nancy Pelosi has NO RESPECT for the dignity of life.

Nancy Pelosi has a 100% pro-abortion voting record. She is has the top rating from NARAL.

No baby is safe in America while Nancy Pelosi is in office.

Here is Pelosi’s record on the dignity of life.

Via OnTheIssues.

Voted YES on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines.Allows federal funding for research that utilizes human embryonic stem cells, regardless of the date on which the stem cells were derived from a human embryo, provided such embryos: have been donated from in vitro fertilization clinics; were created for the purposes of fertility treatment; were in excess of the needs of the individuals seeking such treatment and would otherwise be discarded; and were donated by such individuals with written informed consent and without any financial or other inducements.

Proponents support voting YES because:

Since 2 years ago, the last Stem Cell bill, public support has surged for stem cells. Research is proceeding unfettered and, in some cases, without ethical standards in other countries. And even when these countries have ethical standards, our failures are allowing them to gain the scientific edge over the US. Some suggest that it is Congress’ role to tell researchers what kinds of cells to use. I suggest we are not the arbiters of research. Instead, we should foster all of these methods, and we should adequately fund and have ethical oversight over all ethical stem cell research.

Opponents support voting NO because:

A good deal has changed in the world of science. Amniotic fluid stem cells are now available to open a broad new area of research. I think the American people would welcome us having a hearing to understand more about this promising new area of science. As it stands today, we will simply have to debate the bill on the merits of information that is well over 2 years old, and I think that is unfortunate.

The recent findings of the pluripotent epithelial cells demonstrates how quickly the world has changed. Wouldn’t it be nice to have the researcher before our committee and be able to ask those questions so we may make the best possible judgment for the American people?

Reference: Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act; Bill HR 3 (“First 100 hours”) ; vote number 2007-020 on Jan 11, 2007

Voted YES on allowing human embryonic stem cell research.To provide for human embryonic stem cell research. A YES vote would: Call for stem cells to be taken from human embryos that were donated from in vitro fertilization clinics Require that before the embryos are donated, that it be established that they were created for fertility treatment and in excess of clinical need and otherwise would be discarded Stipulate that those donating the embryos give written consent and do not receive any compensation for the donation.

Reference: Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act; Bill HR 810 ; vote number 2005-204 on May 24, 2005

Voted NO on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions.To prevent the transportation of minors in circumvention of certain laws relating to abortion, and for other purposes, including: Allowing for exemptions to the law if the life of the minor is in danger or if a court in the minor’s home state waive the parental notification required by that state Allocating fines and/or up to one year imprisonment of those convicted of transporting a minor over state lines to have an abortion Penalizing doctors who knowingly perform an abortion procedure without obtaining reasonable proof that the notification provisions of the minor’s home state have been satisfied Requiring abortion providers in states that do not have parental consent laws and who would be performing the procedure on a minor that resides in another state, to give at least a 24 hour notice to the parent or legal guardian Specifying that neither the minor nor her guardians may be prosecuted or sued for a violation of this act

Reference: Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act; Bill HR 748 ; vote number 2005-144 on Apr 27, 2005 

Voted NO on making it a crime to harm a fetus during another crime.Vote to pass a bill that would make it a criminal offense to harm or kill a fetus during the commission of a violent crime. The measure would set criminal penalties, the same as those that would apply if harm or death happened to the pregnant woman, for those who harm a fetus. It is not required that the individual have prior knowledge of the pregnancy or intent to harm the fetus. This bill prohibits the death penalty from being imposed for such an offense. The bill states that its provisions should not be interpreted to apply a woman’s actions with respect to her pregnancy.

Reference: Unborn Victims of Violence Act; Bill HR 1997 ; vote number 2004-31 on Feb 26, 2004

Voted NO on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mother’s life.Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: Vote to pass a bill banning a medical procedure, which is commonly known as “partial-birth” abortion. The procedure would be allowed only in cases in which a women’s life is in danger, not for cases where a women’s health is in danger. Those who performed this procedure, would face fines and up to two years in prison, the women to whom this procedure is performed on are not held criminally liable.

Reference: Bill sponsored by Santorum, R-PA; Bill S.3 ; vote number 2003-530 on Oct 2, 2003

Voted NO on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research.Vote to pass a bill that would forbid human cloning and punish violators with up to 10 years in prison and fines of at least $1 million. The bill would ban human cloning, and any attempts at human cloning, for both reproductive purposes and medical research. Also forbidden is the importing of cloned embryos or products made from them.

Reference: Human Cloning Prohibition Act; Bill HR 534 ; vote number 2003-39 on Feb 27, 2003

Voted NO on funding for health providers who don’t provide abortion info.Abortion Non-Discrimination Act of 2002: Vote to pass a bill that would prohibit the federal, state and local governments that receive federal funding from discriminating against health care providers, health insurers, health maintenance organizations, and any other kind of health care facility, organization or plan, that decline to refer patients for, pay for or provide abortion services. In addition the bill would expand an existing law “conscience clause” that protects physician training programs that refuse to provide training for abortion procedures.

Reference: Bill sponsored by Bilirakis, R-FL; Bill HR 4691 ; vote number 2002-412 on Sep 25, 2002

Voted NO on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad.Vote to adopt an amendment that would remove language reversing President Bush’s restrictions on funding to family planning groups that provide abortion services, counseling or advocacy.

Reference: Amendment sponsored by Hyde, R-IL; Bill HR 1646 ; vote number 2001-115 on May 16, 2001

Voted NO on banning partial-birth abortions.HR 3660 would ban doctors from performing the abortion procedure called “dilation and extraction” [also known as “partial-birth” abortion]. The measure would allow the procedure only if the life of the woman is at risk.

Reference: Bill sponsored by Canady, R-FL; Bill HR 3660 ; vote number 2000-104 on Apr 5, 2000

Voted NO on barring transporting minors to get an abortion.The Child Custody Protection Act makes it a federal crime to transport a minor across state lines for the purpose of obtaining an abortion.

Reference: Bill sponsored by Ros-Lehtinen, R-FL; Bill HR 1218 ; vote number 1999-261 on Jun 30, 1999

Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record.

The post PURE EVIL: Pelosi Who Supports Abortion Up to Birth – Smears Trump Supporters for Not Respecting “Dignity and Worth of Every Person” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Pelosi Trashes Trump: “Cancerous…Malignancy”, and His Supporters: “They don’t share our values in terms of respect for the dignity and worth of every person”

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) trashed President Trump and his supporters in an interview released Friday by Bloomberg Television. Speaking with Francine Lacqua while on a trip to Venice, Italy, Pelosi called Trump a “cancerous…malignancy” and said of Trump’s supporters, “They don’t share our values in terms of respect for the dignity and worth of every person.”

Former Speaker of the House Pelosi was in Venice for the Diane Von Furstenberg awards ceremony that honors “women who have demonstrated leadership, strength, and courage in their commitment to women’s causes.”

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), screen image via Bloomberg/YouTube, September 1, 2023.

Short clip:

Nancy Pelosi smears Americans who voted for President Trump: "They're people we would probably never get" pic.twitter.com/k9SblmNTxh

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) September 1, 2023

Longer video:

Excerpt from Vogue Magazine on Pelosi’s appearance at the DVF Awards:

In a sea of so often self-congratulatory awards ceremonies, Diane Von Furstenberg and The Diller – von Furstenberg Family Foundation’s DVF Awards have, for 14 years now, earmarked women making notable change. Taking place in the historic gardens and pillared buildings of Fondazione Cini on the Isola San Giorgio Maggiore, this year saw UN trailblazers, AI discrimination experts, and ecological activists receive accolades from the likes of Rita Ora and Dame Emma Thompson.

Among those awarded was Amal Clooney, who arrived at the event arm-in-arm with her husband– a rare spot of an off-duty actor amid the SAG-AFTRA strike. Together, before the event formally kicked off, the pair milled around the garden with members of the von Furstenberg family who came in support of the ceremony. Ora, arriving in a sheer black gown, caught up with the honoree she was presenting an award to later, the storyteller and gender advocate Lilly Singh.

Emma Thompson, speaking in fluent Italian to journalists, spoke of her love of the city. “I want to learn how to row!” she said, laughing, in reference to the gondolas that rode through choppy waters of the city. She was wearing a dress; a rarity for the pant-suit-favoring actor. Von Furstenberg had convinced her to do so.

After an acapella performance of “Somewhere Over the Rainbow” by Jewel, the ceremony opened with an address from speaker emerita Nancy Pelosi, who said in her speech that “Venice was the woman at the end of the rainbow.” Shortly after, Singh collected her award from an emotional Ora, speaking about the cumulative impact of shame on women.

More from the Pelosi interview on Trump:

Pelosi: “…He was clever: undermine the press, undermine the rule of law, I’m above the law. So, seeing the length to which he will go of course is more frightening. He’s a threat to our democracy, but we intend to win.”

Lacqua: “He’s so popular.”

Pelosi: “Well, he’s popular among his his group.”

Lacqua: “Are you surprised at how popular he is with?”

Pelosi: “Well, I’m never surprised it’s not a word I use. (Crosstalk.) It’s interesting to see how there’s a certain element of the population who will just go for him. They’re people we would probably never get. They don’t share our values in terms of respect for the dignity and worth of every person and the rest. But there are some who are supporting him who are just afraid. They don’t see a place for their families in the future, they’re concerned about globalization, they’re concerned about immigration, they’re concerned about innovation, they’re concerned about diversity, women, minorities, lgbtq, other people coming into the leadership arena and they, um, and, and that’s to be respected. So I respect all of the people of America. And I when people ask me, “Are you afraid of what might happen?”, I say, “no”, because of the goodness of the American people, the strength of our democracy. We will prevail and my motto is ‘the flag is still there’ as we say in our national anthem.”

Lacqua: “Is there a Republican president and a candidate that you could live with?”

Pelosi: “I’m not into Republicans, I’m into the Democrats and hopefully the Republican Party can find a candidate that America could live with. I say to the Republicans all the time, “Take back your party.” The Republican party is a great party. You’ve done great things for our country. You’re not you’re not a cult to a thug, you’re a great, grand old party and recapture that because the public, America needs a strong Republican party, a strong Democratic party too, but a strong Republican party. So hopefully, uh, as soon as we get through this, um, shall we say cancerous situation that we’re in, uh, the malignancy of, of Trump, they will emerge in a strong way with the leadership that I know is there in the Republican party–not necessarily in the Congress but in the country.”

Transcribed by TGP.

The post Pelosi Trashes Trump: “Cancerous…Malignancy”, and His Supporters: “They don’t share our values in terms of respect for the dignity and worth of every person” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.