Kari Lake, the rightful winner of the 2022 Election for Arizona Governor, has spoken out on last night’s Arizona Supreme Court ruling, which sent an essential piece of her lawsuit challenging the fraudulent election back to the trial court for further review. 

The signature verification process in Maricopa County is a house of cards,” said Lake. “Thanks to this ruling my team will get the chance to topple it.”

The Gateway Pundit reported last night that the Arizona Supreme Court put out an order “granting review of issue number six to the extent count three of the complaint challenges the Maricopa County Recorder’s application of signature-verification policies during the election.”

WATCH: Katie Hobbs Sworn Into Office At Illegitimate Private Ceremony, Breaks Out In Laughter When Asked To Swear That She Will Support the Constitution

“On Wednesday, the Arizona Supreme Court found that the trial court had erred in their dismissal of Kari Lake’s bombshell signature verification evidence, and has ordered that the lower court rectify that error,” said Lake and her team.

Kari’s lawsuit alleges that “Maricopa County officials also permitted the counting of tens of thousands of mail-in and drop box ballots that did not satisfy signature verification requirements.”

The Gateway Pundit reported on an investigation and presentation in the Arizona Senate Elections Committee, after the Maricopa County Superior Court dismissed Lake’s lawsuit, which estimated that nearly 300,000 ballots failed signature verification standards in the 2022 Election.

If proven true, this will draw into question every election in the state and across our country.

A new poll of 1,000 likely Arizona voters from Rasmussen Reports, showed that Kari Lake won by eight points against corrupt Democrat Katie Hobbs! Republican Abe Hamadeh also had 49% of votes to Democrat Kris Mayes’ 43%, and Republican Mark Finchem, who supposedly lost by 120,000 votes, had 46% of support among all voters to Democrat Adrian Fontes’ 43%, according to the new poll.

Following the Supreme Court’s Order sending the case back to the trial court, Kari released the following statement to the press:

HUGE: AZ Supreme Court Rules In Favor of Kari Lake, Forces Lower Court to Look at Signature Verification Issues

On Wednesday, the Arizona Supreme Court found that the trial court had erred in their dismissal of Kari Lake’s bombshell signature verification evidence, and has ordered that the lower court rectify that error.

Kari Lake Released the Following Statement:

“I am thrilled that the Supreme Court has agreed to give our signature verification evidence the appropriate forum for the evaluation it deserves.

For years signatures have been a third rail for Maricopa County. The process of verifying these signatures is the only security measure on mail-in ballots. The amount of time allotted to check these signatures was only 8 seconds, which is not humanly possible. The system is completely broken. That’s why they are absolutely terrified of letting anyone take a look at their signatures. 

The signature verification process in Maricopa County is a house of cards. Thanks to this ruling my team will get the chance to topple it.

Immediately following the election, multiple Maricopa County Elections Department officials – individuals who were involved in the signature verification process – reached out to me and urged my team to review the signatures.

Now, thanks to this Supreme Court ruling, my team will be able to give the signatures the scrutiny they deserve.

Three whistleblowers came forward with revelations of massive failures in the signature verification process. These whistleblowers were intimately involved in the process and they allege that Maricopa County WILLFULLY ignored law and procedure.

This violation of procedure allowed for tens of thousands of illegal ballots to be approved and counted. Aside from all other issues, including nearly 60% of polling locations being inoperable on Election Day, this issue alone casts the veracity of Katie Hobb’s victory in serious doubt.

When we verify these allegations, there will be no doubt that this election was compromised and that its results fail to meet the standard of certainty as outlined in Arizona law.”

Remember, The newly selected regime that stole Arizona’s top statewide offices is threatening to jail Kari Lake with potential felony charges for speaking out and sharing images of fraudulent ballot signatures that were made public by the Arizona Sentate. They are terrified of the truth about signature verification coming to light.

“I Vote “Aye” Under Duress” – Arizona Mohave County Board of Supervisor Coerced to Certify 2022 Election

Lake told the goons in Arizona, “hit me with your best shot” and vowed to “never, ever back down!”

They want to ARREST me for exposing fraud in the 2022 Election.

Now, the AZ Supreme Court has ruled that the very fraud I highlighted has to be looked at. This is big, folks.

Hit me with your best shot.
I will never, ever back down.

Try me. pic.twitter.com/YDIuprUM1W

— Kari Lake (@KariLake) March 23, 2023

The Gateway Pundit will continue to provide updates on the order from the trial court and the schedule for Lake’s signature complaint.

The post “They are Absolutely Terrified” – Kari Lake Releases Statement On NEW AZ Supreme Court Ruling, Forcing Trial Court to Look at Signature Verification Fraud appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Australia’s banks are not “debanking” conservatives because of their beliefs and related statements made in the press and on social media.  

Australian Maria Zeee from Zeee Media shared the following with TGP.

Maria shared that for approximately one month she noticed that her bank card was not working at most ATM’s.  She recently rang ING Bank to see whether there was anything wrong with her card, or her account, or any flags on their end that would be restricting her card access, they advised there was nothing showing on their end.

Then on March 3, 2023, ING emailed Zeee saying her accounts would be closed and access stopped within one week.

Zeee next called ING on the same day and they confirmed the email was from them.  She shared that she spoke to their “Specialist Team” member who she was told could give her more information.  The team asked Zeee to read the email to them, advising that although it was from them they did not have a copy of the email.  In response, they repeated the same information that Zeee had to read to them as to why her account was shut, but still, no reason was specified.

Zeee shared that she has a legitimate, registered business and she pays her taxes.  The bank then confirmed that there was nothing showing on their end to indicate she had done anything “wrong” in financial terms or my financial conduct.

So Zeee asked:

Do you shut down people’s accounts due to their political views by any chance?”  I was met with a long silence, followed by being placed on hold. The representative came back to me repeating the same, generic information.  I asked the question several times, and the representative refused to answer.

Knowing ING has done this to people before as reported in the MSM based not on what they’ve done but who they are, I both called and emailed their PR Manager, asking the following:

1. What is the reason ING is still doing this?
2. What are some likely reasons ING would close an account?
3. Why are the Complaints Resolutions Team, touted as specialists, unable to provide a reason as to why this is occurring when customers call them for an explanation?
4. Does ING close people’s accounts for their political views?

ING responded a week later with:

Thank you for reaching out.  We’re unable to discuss any account closures due to customer confidentiality.

Zeee notes that ING Group is listed as a partner on the WEF website.  Its leadership has attended the WEF in Davos.

Zeee says that Zeee Media reports extensively on the WEF, exposing their true agenda and Australian politicians linked to the WEF.  ING’s refusal to answer our questions led us to believe that this may be politically motivated.  This timing coincides with a hit piece run by 60 minutes on the Wieambilla tragedy, where I am featured warning about Australian soldiers training to turn against Australian people, and Channel 9 is indirectly lumping me in with domestic terrorists:

(Timestamp 40:00 – 41:02)

This is the article she was reporting on, directly from a government website that 60 minutes used in their piece.

Zeee shares:

We are not saying that these coincide, or that our reporting is the reason for my debanking, but it certainly begs the questions:

1. Will banks debank Australians for speaking out against the mainstream narrative?
2. Is this the beginning of the social credit system in Australia?
3. Is the WEF colluding with Australian banks to strip citizens of their income and remove them from the economy if they dare to report on them?
4. Are banks colluding with the Mainstream Media to punish citizens and paint them in the light of domestic terrorists?

Here is Zeee Media’s official report on the matter:

The post EXCLUSIVE: Australia Banks are Now “Debanking” Independent Journalists Exercising Their Free Speech Rights appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.