Important Free Speech Case Began Today: Pro-Trumper Doug Mackey Faces 10 Years in Prison Over Satirical Tweet

Back in January of 2021, The Gateway Pundit reported on pro-Trump meme maker, “Ricky Vaughn”, who we now know to be Doug Mackey, being indicted just days after Joe Biden took over the White House.  Mackey was an anonymous Twitter user who regularly posted political memes poking fun at or calling out then presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.  Today marks the beginning of his trial over a century old law that has never been applied to free speech.

Pro-Trump Meme Maker “Ricky Vaughn” Indicted For Using Twitter to ‘Spread Election Disinformation’ to Hillary Clinton Voters in 2016 – Faces 10 Years in Prison

 

In the run up to the 2016 election, Mackey posted a satirical meme telling Clinton voters that they could vote for Clinton by texting “Hillary” to a certain phone number.  This is absurd to think it would be taken seriously considering there has never been any discussion about “voting by phone” in the 2016 election run up.  And using whatever device one would view Mackey’s tweet through could easily be used to affirm that there is no such thing as “vote by phone.”  But an over-zealous DOJ took up the case five years later in 2021, days after Biden occupied the White House, and now Mackey is facing up to ten years in prison.  The original tweet as it was posted:

 

Mackey, at the time in 2016, had more influence on Twitter than CNN, NBC, and the Colbert Report, according to a substack article by Paulos.  This deduction by Paulos likely came from the criminal complaint in which the Eastern District of New York cited an MIT Media Lab report that ranked Mackey’s account as the “107th most important influencer of the then-upcoming Election, ranking it above more widely known outlets and individuals such as NBC News (#114), Stephen Colbert (#119) and Newt Gingrich (#141).”  The report also states that Mackey had just over 58,000 followers at that time.  That number is relevant because a similar post was made by Kristina Wong, currently with 27.4k followers, telling voters that she is “coming out…I’m a Trump supporter” and reminding her “fellow Chinese Americans for Trump and people of color for Trump to vote! Vote for Trump on Wednesday, November 9th.”  Obviously, that election was held on November 8th, 2016, the day Wong made the tweet.

This tweet, as published by The Gateway Pundit in January 2021, is still viewable on Twitter to this day:

Hey 🇺🇸Trump Supporters🇺🇸! Skip poll lines at #Election2016 and TEXT in your vote! Text votes are legit. Or vote tomorrow on Super Wednesday! pic.twitter.com/ES34HV0yad

— Kristina Wong ❄ (@mskristinawong) November 8, 2016

 

Ironically, Mackey’s post makes no mention of race, color, gender, or any other protected class while Wong’s satirical post is openly targeting “Chinese Americans” and “People of Color,” specifically those “for Trump”.  This is likely a 5th and 14th Amendment violation of either the “Due Process Clause” or the “Equal Protection Clause,” respectively, utilizing the same absurdity applied by Biden’s DOJ to Doug Mackey.  To be perfectly clear:  I don’t believe Wong is in the wrong here, either.

Mackey none the less is still being charged under a 100 year-old law that was intended to prosecute violent acts involving the intimidation against black Americans to keep them from voting.  This law has never been used to prosecute free speech.  18 USC 241 states that:

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

18 USC 241 does not, however, specifically refer to elections and, therefore, its application in the censoring of free speech could open up precedent with far reaching implications.  Eugene Volokh of Tablet and a First Amendment law professor at UCLA writes:

…to return to Mackey the meme-maker, there is no such clear and narrow federal statute. Instead, the statute under which Mackey is being prosecuted bans all conspiracies “to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person … in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution.”

It’s not obvious that deceiving someone into voting in an invalid way qualifies as “injur[ing]” or “oppress[ing].” But if the statute does cover deception, then there’s nothing in the text limiting such deception to speech about the mechanics of voting. Alleged lies about the government or national security or the economy could also be prosecuted, if the government thought they were intended to discourage people from voting. Some might applaud that, on the theory that the law should do more to punish political lies generally. But as we saw above, many courts are quite skeptical about general bans on lies in elections.

Furthermore, according to a follow-up article by Revolver News, the FBI also used a “confidential witness” who pleaded guilty to the same conspiracy charge but is now working with the federal government.  Because he is “presently engaged in proactive investigations…” his identity is being concealed from Mackey and his defense team.  This seems to be yet another violation of Mackey’s rights, this time of the Sixth Amendment that grants a defendant the right to “be confronted with the witnesses against him.”

Revolver News’s Darren Beatie told Steve Bannon last month that the government hasn’t been able to produce a “single aggrieved party that didn’t vote as a result of this satirical meme.”  The Federal Government is now apparently pursuing a criminal charge against a man for a Tweet in which not one single case of an injured party can be presented.

The Eastern District of New York went as far attempting to require the panel of jurors all be vaccinated.  This, of course, is a vastly political position in this country at the moment and would have undoubtedly swayed the jury in favor of the prosecution.  This order, however, was not adopted.

 

This case will likely have far-reaching implications with an administration and bureaucracy that seems hellbent on censoring Americans based on what they deem to be “mis, dis, or malinformation”.

Hat tip Paulos

The post Important Free Speech Case Began Today: Pro-Trumper Doug Mackey Faces 10 Years in Prison Over Satirical Tweet appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Dem Presidential Wanna-be Candidate Gov Whitmer Hilariously Blames Data When Asked Why DOUBLE The Number of People In MI Died of COVID Compared to FL Where Lockdowns Were Lifted 10 Months Earlier

“Big Gretch”—like Hillary Clinton, never seems satisfied with her current political position—she’s always looking to climb the ladder to the next role that will give her the most power.

100 Percent Fed Up reports – In 2020, at the peak of the COVID pandemic, Whitmer proved the damage she was capable of inflicting on Michigan citizens when she used authority she didn’t have via an executive order that was later deemed unconstitutional by the MI Supreme Court to lock down healthy citizens and destroy the economy in her state. At the same time she was taking a wrecking ball to Michigan, Governor Gretchen Whitmer was auditioning for her next role as Biden’s vice president.

In October 2022, during an interview with Paul Egan of the Detroit Free Press, Governor Whitmer, the “victim” of an FBI-led kidnapping plot, with no evidence of her unproven accusation, attempted to tie the group of men accused of plotting to kidnap her to President Trump and white supremacy.

When the story first broke about the alleged kidnapping plot, the so-called target of the plot, Michigan’s tyrannical governor Gretchen Whitmer, was auditioning to become Biden’s vice president but was losing support from Michigan residents of both major political parties over her horrible handling of the COVID pandemic that included tyrannical lockdowns and the intentional placing of COVID positive patients into nursing homes.

But how much of the kidnapping plot was actually organic, and how much of it was a set-up by the FBI to turn one of America’s most unpopular governors into a “victim”? With the 2020 general election only one month away and Trump’s reliance on Michigan as a must-win state, the timing of the “kidnapping” story couldn’t have been more perfect.

It’s been strongly rumored in Michigan that the governor who destroyed the restaurant, bar, and services industries in her state because of her wreckless COVID policies has now decided she will challenge Joe Biden in the 2024 Presidential Primary election.

On Sunday, the authoritarian MI Dem Gov Gretchen Whitmer appeared to kick off her presidential campaign with an interview with CNN host Chris Wallace.

During his interview with the Dem Presidential candidate wanna-be, Gretchen Whitmer, Wallace asked a number of important questions, like how she has become known as “Big Gretch,” a nickname which Whitmer claims she embraces, saying “no woman wants to see ‘big’ in front of her name,” but that she’s okay with it because it  “cracks” her up.

When Whitmer was asked a serious question about how she abused her authority when she placed so many unnecessary and arbitrary restrictions on MI citizens during the COVID health crisis, she did what she does best, she deflected and lied.

CNN host Chris Wallace asked the Democrat governor why she threatened citizens in her state with punitive actions for trying to buy garden seeds. Michigan’s tyrannical governor, who’s perfected the science of the “awwwww shucks” answer, responded, “We had to make some decisions that, in retrospect, don’t make a lot of sense, right? You could go to the hardware store, but we didn’t want people, you know, all congregating around the gardening supplies—It was February in Michigan—No one was planting anyway. But that being said, some of those policies I look back on and think that was maybe a little more than we needed to do.”

Gee, Big Gretch—Ya think your policies were “a little more” than what was needed in your state??

Watch:

Democrat Gov. Gretchen Whitmer disputes the accuracy of data which shows Michigan's death rate during her restrictions on public gatherings was far higher than Florida, which didn't have restrictions. pic.twitter.com/0hUGiEk1mH

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) March 13, 2023

In addition to downplaying her senseless policies, Whitmer actually lied when she said, “no one was planting in February,” because her seed ban went beyond February and into April when citizens could very well have been planting seeds.

Whitmer also tried to justify why so many more Michigan residents died of COVID compared to Florida between June 2020 and June 2021, during the period when Governor Ron DeSantis made the decision to end restrictions on public gatherings a full 10 months before Governor Whitmer.

Of course, the Democrat governor blames the statistics, which she claims may not be reliable, instead of considering the obvious reasons for the excessive number of COVID deaths in Michigan, like her decision to send COVID-positive patients into nursing homes and long-term care facilities.

Watch:

Democrat Gov. Gretchen Whitmer disputes the accuracy of data which shows Michigan's death rate during her restrictions on public gatherings was far higher than Florida, which didn't have restrictions. pic.twitter.com/0hUGiEk1mH

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) March 13, 2023

Governor Whitmer, a known fraud in her home state, was caught unmasked with a large group of friends in a Michigan State University bar one month before she finally lifted restrictions on public gatherings or mask mandates.

She was also caught flying to the free state of Florida on a private plane owned by a donor while citizens were being asked not to travel outside the state of Michigan.

The post Dem Presidential Wanna-be Candidate Gov Whitmer Hilariously Blames Data When Asked Why DOUBLE The Number of People In MI Died of COVID Compared to FL Where Lockdowns Were Lifted 10 Months Earlier appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

About Us

Virtus (virtue, valor, excellence, courage, character, and worth)

Vincit (conquers, triumphs, and wins)