Ben Shapiro Outlines ‘Strongest Case’ For Being Pro-Life On Lex Fridman Podcast

Daily Wire co-founder and author Ben Shapiro outlined the “strongest case” for being pro-life Monday, which he said includes a “bright-line moral rule” about when life begins that “shifts the burden of proof” to the person arguing for abortion.

Shapiro was asked to lay out the pro-life case during a wide-ranging multi-hour interview with Lex Fridman, a computer scientist, MIT professor, and podcast host.

“The ‘strongest case’ for pro-life is that from conception a human life has been created; it is a human life with potential,” Shapiro responded to Fridman. “That human life with potential now has an independent interest in its own existence.”

“The clear dividing line between a-human-life-exists and a-human-life-does-not-exist is the biological creation of an independent human life with its own DNA strands, etc., which happens at conception,” the “Right Side of History” author explained.

“Once you acknowledge that there is that independent human life with potential and I keep calling it that because people sometimes say ‘potential human life’; it’s not a potential human life; it’s a human life that is not developed yet to the full extent that it will develop once you say that, and once you say that it has its own interest, now the burden of proof is to explain why bodily autonomy ought to allow for the snuffing out of that human life, if we believe that human life ought not to be killed for ‘no good reason.’ … The burden of proof is now shifted.”

“It’s very difficult to draw any other line that doesn’t seem somewhat arbitrary,” Shapiro offered. “If you said independent heartbeat, well, people have pacemakers; if you say brain function, people have various levels of brain function as adults; if you say viability, babies are not viable after they are born. If I left a newborn baby on a table and did not take care of it, it would be dead in two days. Once you start getting into sort of these lines, it starts to get very fuzzy very quickly.”

“If you’re looking for sort of a bright-line moral rule, that would be the bright-line moral rule,” Shapiro posited. “That’s sort of the pro-life case.”

Fridman followed-up, asking if the question about when life begins is religious or scientific.

“When life begins is a question of science,” Shapiro quickly responded. “When that life becomes valuable enough for people to want to protect it is going to be a question that is beyond science science doesn’t have moral judgments to make about the value of human life.”

WATCH:

.@benshapiro explains to @lexfridman the strongest argument for the pro-life position

Check out the full interview here: https://t.co/XS2YGmlaOk pic.twitter.com/RPXG15dKR3

— Daily Wire (@realDailyWire) November 7, 2022

COM_EA_FEEDS_ORIGINAL_AUTHOR

Fetterman Campaign Sues Pennsylvania Election Officials To Have Ballots Without Dates And Incorrect Dates Counted

Pennsylvania Democratic lieutenant governor John Fetterman’s U.S. Senate campaign filed a lawsuit Monday against state election officials, arguing that mail ballots with an incorrect or blank date should be counted in Tuesday’s election.

Plaintiffs have asked a federal judge to order all mail ballots to be counted regardless of the date voters pen on the envelope. The lawsuit comes a week after the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that officials should set aside and not count mail ballots with an incorrect or empty date.

”The date [requirement] imposes unnecessary hurdles that eligible Pennsylvanians must clear to exercise their most fundamental right, resulting in otherwise valid votes being arbitrarily rejected without any reciprocal benefit to the Commonwealth,” the lawsuit reads.

Plaintiffs in the case argue that the date instruction has no relevance to determining whether an individual is qualified to vote under Pennsylvania law as long as voters cast ballots by the date of the election and meet the standard U.S. voter requirements.

The lawsuit alleges that election officials are rejecting “qualified voters who accidentally failed to write the date on their ballot envelope, and more still will be rejected when voters enter an incorrect date, such as their birthdate, instead of the date they completed or signed their ballot.”

Fetterman and his Republican opponent Dr. Mehmet Oz have been campaigning neck-to-neck for the congressional seat in the battleground state.

According to three separate polls from the Trafalgar Group, Big Data Poll, and InsiderAdvantage/FOX 29, Philadelphia voters have Oz up by two points in a race where every vote counts to determine the winner.

But without the support from state law to count mail ballots marked an incorrect or blank date, Democrats could likely lose tens of thousands of votes that would be thrown out.

Although it’s unclear how many ballots will be affected by the Supreme Court ruling, Democrats disproportionately use mail ballots over Republicans.

Democracy Docket reports that registered Democrats have returned 70% of approximately 14,000 mail-in and absentee ballots in Monroe County —  nearly four times the percentage ballots returned by Republican voters.

According to the lawsuit, Democrats argue that rejecting ballots without a correct date violates the First Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment, which says “a state cannot utilize election practices that unduly burden the right to vote.”

The Philadelphia Inquirer reports voting rights groups joined together to file a separate lawsuit in a Pittsburgh federal court following the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling last week, arguing that county officials should not be allowed to toss out such ballots under the Materiality Provision of the Civil Rights Act, which has secured victories in similar cases.

Federal court officials have yet to set a hearing for the lawsuit.

COM_EA_FEEDS_ORIGINAL_AUTHOR

About Us

Virtus (virtue, valor, excellence, courage, character, and worth)

Vincit (conquers, triumphs, and wins)