A new slimmed-down Republican Party platform that won quick and overwhelming approval is the latest sign of former President Trump's expanding ideological grip over the GOP.

While the platform – which softens longstanding Republican Party language in support of a federal ban on abortion – was praised by a number of top social conservative leaders, not all evangelicals were happy with the new document.

The platform, drafted by the former president and his top aides, was passed on Monday by a committee dominated by Trump supporters, which met behind closed doors in Milwaukee ahead of next week's Republican National Convention.

The vote in favor of the platform – which was loaded with populism and nationalism – was 84 to 18, according to a source who attended the meeting.

LISTEN: WHAT TRUMP TOLD FOX NEWS ABOUT HIS RUNNING MATE SEARCH

"Ours is a forward-looking Agenda with strong promises that we will accomplish very quickly when we win the White House and Republican Majorities in the House and Senate," Trump wrote on social media as he praised the passage of the platform.

The platform, titled "America First: A Return to Common Sense," is the GOP's first in eight years, as the 2016 document was duplicated in 2020. The 2016 platform weighed in at roughly 66 pages. The new version came in at just 16 pages.

The platform's section on abortion was significantly softened from the 2016 document.

WATCH: WHAT RNC CHAIR WHATLEY TOLD FOX NEWS ABOUT THE GOP CONVENTION

Following Trump's lead, the document spotlights that abortion is best handled by the states.

"We believe that the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States guarantees that no person can be denied life or liberty without due process and that the states are, therefore, free to pass laws protecting those rights," the draft reads.

However, for the first time in 40 years, the document makes no mention of a federal abortion ban, which the presumptive GOP presidential nominee has emphasized that he opposes.

Instead, the new platform stresses, "We will oppose late term abortion while supporting mothers and policies that advance prenatal care, access to birth control, and IVF (fertility treatments)."

In a letter spotlighted by the Trump campaign and the Republican National Committee, seven evangelical and anti-abortion leaders - including Faith and Freedom Coalition Chairman Ralph Reed and SBA Pro-Life America president Marjorie Dannenfelser - gave their support to the platform.

"President Donald J. Trump has a clear track record of keeping his promises. During his first term, we pro-life and pro-family leaders applauded his courageous leadership," the letter highlighted. "We support President Trump’s vision and his commitment reflected in the Platform to the causes that millions of Americans hold so dear – protecting life and promoting the family."

However, not everyone was happy.

"I am concerned the Republican Party is moving away from its strong, definitive goal of protecting children from the moment of conception," Tony Perkins, president of the influential Family Research Council, wrote on social media.

Brent Leatherwood, president of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, which is the public policy wing of the Southern Baptist Convention, took to social media to argue that "now is the time to advocate for a robust vision for life — at all levels of government — not retreat from it."

Additionally, ahead of the vote, a policy group aligned with former Vice President Mike Pence - who has long been a champion for evangelical voters - urged the convention delegates on the platform committee not to purge the anti-abortion language.

The platform also abandoned long-standing language opposing same-sex marriage.

On economic issues, the platform does not spotlight reducing the national debt and instead calls to "end inflation" and "Make America Affordable again."

In a major break from past precedent on trade issues, the platform now supports tariffs.

The document also highlights Trump's pledge against cutting Social Security or Medicare.

Marc Short, a director of legislative affairs in the Trump administration and a chief of staff for then-Vice President Pence who this cycle served as a top adviser on Pence's unsuccessful presidential campaign, took aim at the planks.

"Embracing tariffs and avoiding addressing entitlement spending, have been mainstays of the Democrat party. Adopting massive tax increases ( tariffs) as part of the Republican platform will not lead to economic prosperity," Short argued.

The platform also included much of the language and rhetoric Trump uses on the campaign trail, including calls for the U.S. border with Mexico to be sealed and urging an end to "the weaponization of government against the American people."

"It doesn’t say we’re not going to support this or that. It just focuses on the broad issues that everybody knows we’re going to support," said a delegate who supported the platform who asked for anonymity to speak more freely.

The delegate told Fox News that the new platform "is something that I can go out and sell. It’s very simple, straightforward, very readable and very understandable."

The Biden campaign took aim at the document, charging that "Donald Trump’s policy "platform" reads more like the screed of an unhinged and unwell conspiracy theorist who hates America and is in it for himself."

The platform is expected to be easily approved at the full party convention next week.

Get the latest updates from the 2024 campaign trail, exclusive interviews and more at our Fox News Digital election hub.

Prince William is said to have banned his brother Prince Harry from ever returning to the royal fold.

The explosive claim came from British royals expert Hilary Fordwich, who said the heir to the British throne is taking a no-nonsense approach to addressing his ongoing sibling feud.

"It is widely known within the family that Prince William has laid down an absolute ban on Harry returning in any way, shape or form into his former royal family fold," Fordwich claimed to Fox News Digital.

PRINCE WILLIAM, KATE MIDDLETON ARE 'PILLARS' OF 'SHAKY' MONARCHY: ‘WHOLE THING CAN COME CRASHING DOWN’: EXPERT

"If anyone will relent, it would be King Charles III, whom, of course, Prince William won’t challenge, who still misses his ‘darling boy’ and would like to see more of Prince Harry," Fordwich claimed. "However, to this day, after the release of ‘Spare’ and the Netflix serial, as well as with everything else Harry has said, done, and not done, it’s Prince William who adamantly refuses to even speak to his brother."

A spokesperson for Kensington Palace, which handles the Prince of Wales’s office, didn’t immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

Fordwich’s statement came days after King Charles’ former royal butler Grant Harrold told the New York Post that there’s one thing the Duke of Sussex could do to be welcomed back into the family.

"The only way I see this happening is a public statement from Harry, where you come out and say that you were in a bad space and that [his memoir ‘Spare’] was a mistake," said Harrold.

"I don’t think that’s going to happen," he noted. "Some bad things were said, and some families never patch things up, and that’s how it is… Harry has got a big heart, and a part of him probably wishes things would be different."

While the king, 75, may be willing to spark peace talks with his younger son, Fordwich claimed that William won’t be so easily convinced.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER

"Prince William is the most unlikely royal to ever forgive Harry for all his despicable indiscretions," Fordwich claimed. "He is now very much seen and accepted as the family enforcer, taking on the hard-line ruler role of his grandfather, Prince Philip."

Fordwich added that Harry is "most unlikely to ever release any public apology" given his tell-alls following his royal exit.

"All that has earned him the British nomenclature of ‘Ginger Whinger’ (whiner)," Fordwich claimed.

Harry, who has a strained relationship with his family, rushed to London in February for a very brief visit after the king was diagnosed with an undisclosed type of cancer.

Harry, 39, has seen his father infrequently since the prince quit royal duties in 2020 and moved to California with his wife, Meghan Markle, citing what they said were unbearable intrusions and racist attitudes of the British media. He has since detailed his rocky relationship with his family in TV interviews, a documentary and his memoir, "Spare."

Shortly after his last quick trip to London, Harry told "Good Morning America" that he thought his father’s illness could help bring his family closer.

LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS

In "Spare," Harry details his rivalry with William, 42.

In the book, Harry alleged that during an argument in 2019, William called Meghan "difficult" and "rude" and then grabbed him by the collar and knocked him down. Harry suffered cuts and bruises from landing on a dog bowl. Harry claimed Charles implored the brothers to make up. Following the funeral of Charles’ father, Prince Philip, in 2021, the king pleaded, "Please, boys, don’t make my final years a misery."

"Prince William is not as forgiving as King Charles and takes a much more hard-line approach to Prince Harry," British broadcaster and photographer Helena Chard told Fox News Digital.

"He views his brother's behavior as unforgivable," she claimed. "Prince William is adamant that he will protect his family and the monarchy from further upset. Prince Harry has crossed the trust line. For the purpose of damage limitation and to prevent betrayal and trauma, he has cut communication with Prince Harry."

"Prince Harry also caused unforgivable amounts of upset to the much loved and respected late Queen Elizabeth II," Chard continued. "This factor alone is enough for Prince William to freeze Prince Harry out. If Prince Harry hopes to have a relationship/working relationship with the royal family, then he needs to get his skates on as time is creeping on. He will find himself more and more irrelevant to the future of the royal family.

"There are murmurs that Prince Harry hopes to build bridges with his family, but seeing is believing. It is up to him to show initiative and work toward healing the feud, not only behind closed doors but by offering a more public apology highlighting his errors. The statement should also highlight that he will not do or say anything of further detriment which will negatively impact the royal family."

Chard claimed that despite tensions between the battling brothers, the king "has left the door open" for his younger son.

"He is willing to forgive," claimed Chard. "He will not give up on his son."

Doug Eldridge, an agent, celeb branding and marketing expert and the founder of Achilles PR, told Fox News Digital that Harry should issue a public apology to his family – whether William accepts it or not.

"Harry's family is his brand," Eldridge explained. "Unfortunately for him, that was his only talent and claim to fame… To his credit, he worked diligently to build on his family name and his late mother's legacy, but… Harry's brand will never rebound if he doesn't return to his family because that was his brand. The last name. Full stop."

"Sadly, in a somewhat paradoxical sense, Meghan Markle's brand will crater if she backtracks from the allegations and insinuations she made while flicking a match to the royal family," he said about the Duchess of Sussex.

"The nature of the allegations was too severe… His brand will never recover if he doesn't issue an apology; her brand will be dead on arrival if he does. In the end, truth always wins out. When these types of public allegations are made, the truth eventually comes to the fore. If Meghan and Harry were embellishing – much less fabricating – their sympathy-driven tale, neither of them would have an outward-facing future with the public writ large. For all our differences, neither Americans nor Brits have much patience with dishonesty."

KEVIN COSTNER SHARES WHAT PRINCE WILLIAM REVEALED ABOUT PRINCESS DIANA DURING PAST MEETING

Royal expert Ian Pelham Turner claimed to Fox News Digital that as long as there’s gossip of a "Spare" follow-up, the royals may be wary of accepting any peace offerings from Harry.

"The threat of a second ‘Spare’ book is still causing concern," Pelham Turner claimed. "It weighs very heavily on the thoughts of King Charles and Prince William over what further damaging revelations may come out and if it highlights the animosity between Harry and William especially."

"I feel other senior members like Princess Anne and even Prince Andrew may also be extremely concerned about the return of Harry as they fear potential family secrets may be released at any meetings," he claimed. "I feel the way back for Harry and Meghan is to sign a legal peace treaty with the royal family where the couple would agree not to share any more royal secrets. In return, the family will show great public respect to the couple, which has been extremely lacking before."

For Chard, there is still hope that Harry could win over his family – including his no-nonsense brother.

"Prince Harry may be welcomed back into the royal fold in the future if he is genuinely sorry for the hurt his actions have caused, and he works on rebuilding the trust he has lost," she said.