Biden must support protestors in Iran and enforce sanctions, or else

President Joe Biden has said that "the need for American leadership is as great as it has ever been." The 2022 National Security Strategy recently released by the White House declares that the U.S. will work "with allies and partners to enhance their capabilities to deter and counter Iran’s destabilizing activities." However, the administration’s record shows that it has much more it must do to meet the goals it has set for itself in dealing with Iran.

Under the Trump administration, the U.S. designated Iranian entities, including the Ministry of Petroleum, National Iranian Oil Company, and National Iranian Tanker Company, because of their longstanding ties to terrorism and applied "maximum economic pressure" on Iran. During the Biden administration, sanctions enforcement has not been as aggressive. As a result, Iran has obtained greater sums of money to invest in its military, its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and its terrorist proxy forces and militias through black-market oil sales to China, Venezuela, and Syria.

Ship-tracking data and research gathered by United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) shows that from 2018 to 2020, Iranian oil exports fell from 754 million barrels of oil to 315 million a year. In 2021, however, Iranian oil exports rose by 131 million barrels to 447 million. UANI believes that the value of that spike was $30 billion more for Iran, a 138 percent increase from the year prior. The cause, again, was inadequate sanctions enforcement.

The consequences have been very harmful. The Iranian regime did not use the ill-gotten billions to invest in early childhood education, clean water, infrastructure, or social welfare programs for its people. Instead, Iran earmarked huge sums for its military, including the IRGC, its terrorist proxies, and its street thugs who are seeking to silence Iranian civilians in protests that are now sweeping the country.

NONPROFIT: HOW BIDEN CAN HELP IRANIAN PROTESTORS

Using the official exchange rate against the U.S. dollar and data published by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute and other public reporting, UANI calculates that Iran’s military budget shot up from $2.8 billion in 2020 to $10.5 billion in 2022. The IRGC’s budget alone increased from $900 million in 2020 to $3.6 billion this year.

The extent to which Iran’s terror proxies have benefited from healthier budgets in Tehran is not discernable through publicly available data. However, the anecdotal evidence that the lean years for them are over is abundant. Hezbollah is no longer closing offices, furloughing fighters, or lowering wages as it did when sanctions were strictly enforced. The Houthis have attacked targets such as commercial airports and critical infrastructure in allied countries like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates – which are home to tens of thousands of American expatriates – with some of the same advanced Iranian technologies presently deployed by Russia against the Ukrainian people. And Palestinian terror groups have been resupplied with thousands of rockets to launch in indiscriminate attacks that injure or kill Israelis and Palestinians alike.

The Iranian people have also been hurt by the looser enforcement of U.S. sanctions. A significant portion of the $30 billion that the Iranian regime was able to capture from evading lawful sanctions supports the Iranian police, including the so-called "morality police" unit responsible for the death of Mahsa Amini in September, the Basij paramilitary forces targeting their fellow citizens today, and human rights abusers in the Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS).

The state budget of Iran proposed by President Ebrahim Raisi for 2022-2023 includes a 51 percent increase for the Iranian police, a 45 percent increase for the Basij, and a stunning 82 percent increase for the MOIS. The latter agency has been sanctioned by the U.S. for "serious human rights abuses against the Iranian people since June 12, 2009" including "beatings, sexual abuse, prolonged interrogations, and coerced confessions of prisoners, particularly political prisoners." In January 2022, the spokesman for Iran’s police revealed that their salaries had increased several times during that Iranian calendar year.

There are hopeful signs that the Biden administration is moving toward recognition that the status quo ante, where diplomacy was supported by robust sanctions enforcement, is in American interests. In June and July, new sanctions targeting Iran’s oil sector were announced, but under an authority that would cause them to be lifted if the JCPOA were restored. Similarly, in September, the Treasury Department announced that entities in India, China, and the UAE that facilitate Iran’s illicit shipment of oil had been sanctioned. Much more, however, is required to slow Iran’s military and terror buildup, enhance U.S. security, support the Iranian people, and relieve the buildup of military pressure against our allies and partners in the region.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINION NEWSLETTER 

The Biden administration should commit itself to issuing swift and severe penalties against all individuals and entities supporting Iranian sanctions evasion, particularly in the maritime industry upon which Iran is so heavily dependent. Individual vessels ferrying Iranian oil should be sanctioned along with their owners, operators, and managers under existing sanctions. Flag states, insurers, port authorities, importing agents, classification societies, and other so-called maritime service providers, too, should comply with their obligations under U.S. sanctions or be made to suffer severe financial and reputational damage. Their failures have a very detrimental effect on U.S. national security, and their activities must be curtailed.

Economic sanctions are not a magic bullet in a comprehensive Iran strategy. They are a tool to support our diplomatic and military strategies to protect the U.S., our allies in the region, and the Iranian people from extremism and Iranian aggression. But if the sanctions are not aggressively enforced, they won’t help at all. In fact, they will hurt because the regime in Tehran will see it as a sign of our weakness, and they will take advantage of it.

Joseph Lieberman is chairman of United Against Nuclear Iran. He was the Democratic vice-presidential nominee in 2000 and a U.S. senator from Connecticut, 1989-2013.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM JOE LIEBERMAN

Frequent MSNBC Guest Takes Action To ‘Strip’ Elon Musk Of His U.S. Citizenship, Gets Mocked Instantly

Far-Left radio host Dean Obeidallah, who appears regularly on MSNBC, announced this week that he was trying to take action to “strip” new Twitter CEO Elon Musk of his U.S. citizenship.

“As a lawyer Im going to do research to see if @elonmusk in any way lied on his application for US citizenship,” Obeidallah claimed. “I’ll be making a FOIA request for his immigration application. If he lied anywhere on application we will move to strip him of US citizenship. Stay tuned.”

“I formally made a request via FOIA today for Elon Musk’s immigration application documents,” he continued. “I will let you know what I hear back. The application may be 100% fine with no misinformation or lies. Then again… We will see.”

Obeidallah claimed that Musk was “trying to manipulate both [U.S. political] sides into violence.” “Reminder: Elon musk does NOT the love the USA,” he claimed without evidence. “He is using us to attack each other. Is Elon Putin funded? China funded? Unclear. But he’s anti-American.”

Obeidallah was mocked online over the claims.

Journalist Yashar Ali tweeted: “Some of you have truly lost the plot. Also, you can’t gain access to someone else’s immigration records without their written consent. ‘As a lawyer…'”

Some of you have truly lost the plot.

Also, you can’t gain access to someone else’s immigration records without their written consent.

“As a lawyer…” pic.twitter.com/gjkVqorgL1

— Yashar Ali 🐘 یاشار (@yashar) October 31, 2022

Even as Obeidallah acknowledged that Musk would have to consent to such records being released but then floated a conspiracy theory that Musk could be hiding something if he does not agree.

“If he consents, I will share the file,” Obeidallah tweeted. “If he refuses to consent then we must ask: What is Elon hiding?!”

Political commentator Tatjana Pasalic mocked Obeidallah, writing, “People breathless about fascism on the reg openly promoting stripping @elonmusk of US citizenship because he disagrees with them. Amazing.”

“I did everything by the books when I moved here & now watch the US immigration turn into a joke: open borders, toying with ideas of illegals voting, free money/abortions/IDs-all OK on our tax $$ but @elonmusk disagreeing with a lib?” she continued. “He must be sent back! Much tolerant, very wow.”

I did everything by the books when I moved here & now watch the US immigration turn into a joke: open borders, toying with ideas of illegals voting, free money/abortions/IDs-all OK on our tax $$ but @elonmusk disagreeing with a lib? He must be sent back! Much tolerant, very wow.

— Tatjana Pasalic (@Tattytats) October 31, 2022

“Rookie,” investigative journalist Chuck Ross tweeted. “You’re not getting that s*** through FOIA.”

National Review editor Rich Lowry tweeted, “They’ll want his birth certificate next.”

“If this doesn’t get Musk deported, nothing will,” attorney Scott Greenfield mocked.

Attorney Ari Cohn added, “It seems fitting that a dude who was suspended from practice for 12 years would write something this stupid and incompetent.”

Related: Elon Musk Responds To LeBron James Over Criticisms About Offensive Content On Twitter

COM_EA_FEEDS_ORIGINAL_AUTHOR

About Us

Virtus (virtue, valor, excellence, courage, character, and worth)

Vincit (conquers, triumphs, and wins)