FBI director Kash Patel ripped his predecessor, James Comey, on Wednesday evening after Comey questioned Patel’s fitness to hold the post.

Patel appeared on Fox News’ “Special Report” hosted by Bret Baier to respond to comments Comey had made earlier during an appearance on CNN. Patel said that Comey’s flippant use of social media had inspired a wave of potential threats against President Donald Trump’s life.

Earlier this month, Comey had posted, then deleted a picture off his Instagram page of seashells on a beach arranged to say, “86 47.” The former FBI director was immediately blasted for posting the message, widely understood to be a threat to Trump. “86” is commonly understood to mean “get rid of” and “47” is a reference to Trump as the 47th President of the United States.

“Do you know how many copycats we’ve had to investigate as a result of that beachside venture from the former director?” Patel told Baier.

“Do you know how many agents I’ve had to take offline from chasing down child sex predators, fentanyl traffickers, terrorists because everywhere across this country, people are popping up on social media and think that a threat to the life of the President of the United States is a joke and they can do it because he did it?” Patel continued.

Get 40% Off New DailyWire+ Annual Memberships

“That’s what I’m having to deal with every single day, and that’s what I’m having to pull my agents and analysts off because he thought it was funny to go out there and make a political statement,” he added.

🚨 JUST IN: Kash Patel EVISCERATES James Comey — blames him for COPYCAT threats against Trump’s life

Comey should be LOCKED UP for incitement (at a minimum)

KASH: “Do you know how many agents I have had to take off line chasing down child predators, fentanyl traffickers, &… pic.twitter.com/RVDUQTH8w6

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) May 28, 2025

Comey had previously attacked Patel on CNN, questioning his fitness to head the intelligence agency. Comey himself was fired as FBI director during Trump’s first term.

“Obviously, you start with the fact that the guy has literally nothing in his entire adult life that prepares him for this role. And so, that’s deeply concerning to start with,” Comey said.

“That is a daunting task for him. I hope he lets the career people do their jobs, but they’ve already forced out a bunch of good career people and sent a chill through the organization,” he added.

Comey later claimed he did not know what “86” meant before he posted the message to his social media. He said that he thought it meant to “get out of a place.”

“My wife and I were walking on the beach, and saw those numbers in shells on the beach,” he said, “Somebody else did it!”

A U.S. federal court blocked President Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs that slapped steep hikes on goods from dozens of foreign countries.

The New York-based Court of International Trade ruled on Wednesday that the president overstepped his authority in issuing the wide-ranging tariffs under emergency authority. The court said that the Constitution gives Congress the authority to regulate commerce with foreign countries, not the president.

The court effectively dissolved all tariffs Trump put in place using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a 1977 law that had never been used to implement tariffs until Trump.

“The question in the two cases before the court is whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (‘IEEPA’) delegates these powers to the President in the form of authority to impose unlimited tariffs on goods from nearly every country in the world,” the court wrote. “The court does not read IEEPA to confer such unbounded authority and sets aside the challenged tariffs imposed thereunder.”

A three-judge panel issued the ruling based on two separate lawsuits – one brought by a group of businesses and the other filed on behalf of a dozen states.

Get 40% Off New DailyWire+ Annual Memberships

“Because of the Constitution’s express allocation of the tariff power to Congress … we do not read IEEPA to delegate an unbounded tariff authority to the President. We instead read IEEPA’s provisions to impose meaningful limits on any such authority it confers,” the panel wrote. “The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariffs lack any identifiable limits.”

The judges also said that there is no recognizable emergency to justify the use of the IEEPA to issue sweeping tariffs.

“The challenged Tariff Orders will be vacated and their operation permanently enjoined,” the judges wrote.

The order strikes a blow to what had been one of the key pillars of Trump’s economic policy. The Trump administration has alternatively defended tariffs as a way to rebuild U.S. manufacturing and also to pressure foreign countries into cutting better, more open trade agreements. Trump has also used tariffs to force other concessions on issues such as immigration and drug enforcement.