The U.S. Secret Service had numerous security breakdowns on the day that a would-be assassin opened fire on former President Donald Trump at a political rally in Pennsylvania, according to senior U.S. officials leading the investigation into the agency’s failures that day.

The Washington Post reported that the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said that the Secret Service had an “alarmingly slipshod strategy” to protect Trump that day from being shot at.

Secret Service officials planned to use flags to block anyone from having a clear line of sight on the former president as he spoke on stage in Butler on July 13. However, the resources that were deployed were not used to position the flags in a way that would block a line of sight on Trump.

Investigators found that there were significant discrepancies between how the Secret Service operates for political candidates vs. the sitting President of the United States.

Among the chief differences was that the Secret Service uses a “robust communication system” for presidents and vice presidents that is supported by the U.S. military whereas for political candidates, the agency just uses “a command post for event communications that is separate from local police assigned to the event.”

Am I Racist? Is In Theaters NOW — Get Your Tickets Here!

The investigation found that the Secret Service command post had “no way to receive real-time alerts from local police surveilling the crowd and outer perimeter,” the report said. Police’s warning about the shooter prior to the event was only communicated to one Secret Service official and agents never heard police radio traffic about police trying to track down the suspect before he opened fire.

The forthcoming congressional report also reportedly found that the agency was “slow” to increase security for Trump even though there were intelligence reports that Iran had launched an operation to assassinate the former president.

The Post noted that numerous top Secret Service officials have resigned, retired, or are about to leave ahead of the report’s release, including former Director Kimberly Cheatle, Assistant Director of Protective Operations Mike Plati, and senior executive John Buckley.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) said this week that the American people “are going to be shocked, astonished, and appalled by what we will report to them about the failures by the Secret Service in this assassination attempt on the former president.”

“I think they also ought to be appalled and astonished by the failure of the Department of Homeland Security to be more forthcoming, to be as candid and frank as it should be to them in terms of providing information.”

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) said during a separate interview this week that the Department of Homeland Security was “leaning on the Secret Service not to comply with document requests to Congress.”

Active U.S. Military members responded to Democrat presidential nominee Kamala Harris‘ false claim during last week’s debate about the Biden-Harris administration supposedly removing all military personnel from combat zones.

“As of today, there is not one member of the United States Military who is in active duty in a combat zone, in any war zone around the world, for the first time this century,” Harris falsely boasted during the debate.

During the debate, Harris was not fact-checked by ABC moderators, who have been widely ridiculed for their anti-Trump bias. Active military members, however, did chime in.

Video shows military members watching Harris during the debate, with the caption, “full of lies.”

After Harris makes her false claim, one of the military members turns the camera around on himself and other members and says, “So where the f*** are we, right now?”

WATCH:

Kamala Harris just got hit with the biggest fact check in human history pic.twitter.com/LDeniMIO88

— Kevin Dalton (@TheKevinDalton) September 13, 2024

As highlighted by those in active duty, tens of thousands of U.S. Military members are indeed serving in hostile areas and recognized combat zones.

For example, there are about 2,500 military personnel in Iraq, and around 900 in Syria, fighting Islamic State militants, according to the Department of Defense.

Am I Racist? Is In Theaters NOW — Get Your Tickets Here!

Moreover, a Reuters report from February points out that there are roughly 30,000 U.S. troops scattered in the Middle East, with thousands of additional troops sent to the region since the start of the war in the Gaza Strip, which was sparked during Harris and President Joe Biden’s tenure.

Harris’ response also seems to dismiss the sacrifices of military members who have been killed or injured on her watch, following the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan.

In January, for example, three Army Reserve soldiers were killed at a U.S. base in Jordan, during a drone attack from an Iran-backed militia, The New York Times reported. More than 30 other service members were injured.

Since then, eight service members were injured in a drone attack in Syria, and two U.S. Navy SEALS drowned during a mission tied to Iran.

Moreover, families of U.S. troops who have been injured following the withdrawal are harshly criticizing Harris for her lie.

Brad Illerbrunner, whose son was seriously injured in Iraq in December, said Harris’ remarks at the debate “really [hit] below the belt,” the New York Post reported. “She doesn’t even recognize that our own troops are getting hurt.”

“We’re still in war zones,” he said, adding that the VP is “trying to snow the public.”