When Super Bowl Slogans Replace Truth In American Politics

The following is an edited transcript excerpt of “The Michael Knowles Show.

* * *

During the Bad Bunny halftime show at the Super Bowl a slogan appeared on the big billboard at Levi’s Stadium, right next to a Bud Light ad. Very fitting. 

The message was posted in all caps on a white background in black text and reads:

“THE ONLY THING MORE POWERFUL THAN HATE IS LOVE”

Then a guy on X tweets it out and writes this message above the image: “imagine getting mad about this and still thinking you’re a good person.”

The post has taken off and gone totally viral. Over 4 million views at this point.

Imagine getting mad about this and still thinking you’re a good person pic.twitter.com/jWdNzJmCCE

— Wesley (@WesleyBout) February 9, 2026

Credit: @WesleyBout/X.com

Why would you get mad at the transvestite, anti-American, vulgar, degenerate rap singer babbling in a foreign tongue that the vast majority of Americans don’t understand, featuring two men grinding on each other in front of a sports game that is supposed to be viewed by children? 

Why would you get mad about that? How could you get mad about that when he put up a sign that said, “The only thing more powerful than hate is love”?

Imagine getting mad about this meme. This is a meme that the Right uses to make fun of the Left, and the Left is just now doing it sincerely and unironically. And the meme is this: While they’re killing people, slaughtering babies, mutilating little children, flooding the country with rapists and poison peddlers and murderers, the Left comes out and says, Yeah, but we stand for love. We define everything we do as love and everything you do as hate. So we’re actually the good guys. Did you know that?

Did you know that when the libs redefined marriage for basically the first time anywhere in human history, they did so in such a way that excludes mothers from their children’s families — or alternately excludes fathers from families — and leads to all sorts of horrible things, up to and including creating children for the purpose of denying them their natural mother and father? Really heinous stuff. But what did they say? They said, Love is love. Love wins. How could you oppose love? We have defined the disordered things that we’re doing, that are contrary to reality and to the common good and human flourishing, we’ve defined them as love. And if you oppose us, you hate love.

Checkmate, conservatives.

WATCH: “The Michael Knowles Show” on DailyWire+.

This is like when Anthony Kennedy decided to abdicate his responsibility to interpret the law as a Supreme Court justice. Instead, he decided to write cheap romantic poetry that is fitting for an eighth-grade English class. He decided that his interpretation of the Constitution was going to find a right to privacy, just as he earlier, in an abortion case, had found a right to define the sweet mystery of life somewhere in the Constitution.

I don’t know where it is.

And they say, Look, we support mystery, we support love, we support life.

That’s the key here. Because when your lib friends send that meme around — hate is worse than love, love beats hate — how could you get mad at that? 

At that point, you should tell them that you are pro-life. And they are angry at people who are pro-life. How? Imagine being against life and thinking you’re the good guy.

And what would they say? They’d say, No, no, no, but you’re not really pro-life. You’re anti-choice. You want to control women’s bodies.

They would use all of their own silly euphemisms.

That’s when you say to them: Okay, before we get into the abortion issue, I just want to point out you have granted me the premise. You have accepted the premise that sometimes people use words in ways that can be misleading or tell a partial truth, or at the very least can be euphemistic. You’ve granted that point, right? Okay, great. So you don’t like my phrase “pro-life”? I think pro-life is an honest phrase that accurately depicts what we’re talking about. But you dispute that. Okay, fine.

Then let’s dig into the real substance of it. I support the law coming in and restricting women from going to a medical professional to kill her baby. That’s what we’re talking about. You want to get past the euphemisms and the slogans? That’s what we’re talking about. And what you support is women being able to kill their babies in defense of their own disordered autonomy. Right? That’s what we’re talking about.

With marriage, you support excluding mothers or alternately fathers from marriage and denying babies their natural mothers or fathers. Okay. That’s what you support, along with other acts that we don’t even need to get into when it comes to gay marriage. I support that babies have a demonstrated right to their mothers and their fathers.

Nevertheless, I think you will find that the libs love to promote all their slogans: “love beats hate,” “love is love,” “love wins,” or whatever. I think you will find conservatives, on the other hand, are more than happy to put the slogans aside and talk about the real issue.

The libs will focus on more and more hyperbolic and preposterous slogans. They will do whatever they can to avoid looking at the real issue. They will only speak in euphemisms, and that very fact tells you everything you need to know.

Yes, all politicians use slogans, but the way they use them tells you everything you need to know about the issues.

Conservatives use slogans and euphemisms to try to convey the truth. The Left uses slogans and euphemisms to deny the truth.

‘Why Put Us Through It?’: Chris Cuomo Begs Dems Not To Impeach Trump Again

NewsNation anchor Chris Cuomo called on Democrats to resist the temptation to impeach President Donald Trump if they win control of either the House or the Senate in the fast-approaching 2026 midterm elections.

Cuomo addressed the issue during Tuesday’s broadcast of “The Chris Cuomo Project,” saying that however likely it seemed that Democrats might come out ahead, it would be in the country’s best interest for them to show a little restraint.

WATCH:

🚨NEW: Chris Cuomo implores Dems to *RESIST IMPEACHING TRUMP* if they regain power🚨

“It is a political process … You do not have the votes you need to remove him. It will not happen. So why put us through it?”@DailyCaller pic.twitter.com/bKG2sWDar2

— Jason Cohen 🇺🇸 (@JasonJournoDC) February 10, 2026

“Where is he in terms of how he should be feeling about the midterms?” Cuomo asked in reference to the president — and then pantomimed something apparently intending to show nerves or panic.

“Did you hear what Ted Cruz said to him reportedly, allegedly?” Cuomo continued. “‘You’re going to lose House seats and Senate seats and they’re going to impeach you every day.’ Now, I really hope that last part doesn’t happen. Why? You don’t have the votes to remove him.”

“It is a political process — impeachment. Okay? Removal is a straight up and down vote, you do not have — not up and down, it’s not 50 plus one,” he said. “You do not have the votes you need to remove him. It will not happen. So, why put us through it? And any high-minded idea you give us, I just point you to the last two and see if that helped the country in any way.”

Cuomo is not the only one talking about impeachment as Democrats ramp up the fight for congressional control.

Rep. Al Green (D-TX) has already filed articles of impeachment, as has Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-MI) — and The Hill ran an opinion piece on Monday calling not only for impeachment, but for Democrats to pack the Supreme Court as well.

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) walked a finer line on the issue during a recent interview, cautioning members of her party to make sure that they only proceeded on a possible impeachment if they had good reason to do so. Pelosi did not indicate what constituted a good reason.

“That’s not an incidental thing you say — ‘We’re going to [impeach].’ No, there has to be cause,” Pelosi said at the time. “There has to be reason.”

About Us

Virtus (virtue, valor, excellence, courage, character, and worth)

Vincit (conquers, triumphs, and wins)