Father Of ‘They/Them’ Gunman In Colorado Springs Generates Backlash Over Comments About Tragedy

The father of the 22-year-old man accused of killing five and wounding 17 others at a gay night club in Colorado has generated backlash over remarks that he made about the shooting in interviews with the media.

The alleged gunman, who will not be named per Daily Wire policy about not giving notoriety to mass killers, opened fire inside Club Q in Colorado Springs, which describes itself online as an “adult-oriented gay and lesbian nightclub hosting theme nights such as karaoke, drag shows & DJs.”

Local media reports that authorities said the shooter faces five counts of first-degree murder after deliberation and five counts of a bias-motivated crime that caused bodily injury. Prosecutors suggest the shooting is considered a hate crime based on the bias-motivated crime charge.

The suspect also claims that he is “non-binary” and he uses “they/they” pronouns, according to court documents.

The suspect changed his name after turning 16 years old to distance himself from his criminal father, who is also a porn star and a meth addict. The suspect’s mother was previously accused of arson.

The suspect’s generated backlash online over remarks that he made in relation to learning that his son attacked a gay bar.

“And then I go on to find out it’s a gay bar,” the father said. “I said, ‘God, is he gay?’ I got scared, ‘S***, is he gay?’ And he’s not gay, so I said, ‘Phew …’”

In a different interview, the father reacted to learning that his son was “non-binary.”

“What does that mean? I got to know because I was horrified he was gay,” the father said. “I was like, ‘Oh my God. He’s at a gay bar. He’s gay.’ I’m not homophobic or anything — but to find something out like that – I just didn’t know.”

The father later admitted that he had “failed” his son.

In 2021, the suspect was booked into the El Paso County Jail on “2 counts of Felony Menacing, and 3 counts of First-Degree Kidnapping,” the El Paso County Sheriff’s Office said in a statement.

The charges stemmed from an alleged bomb threat that the suspect made after his mother said that he was “threatening to cause harm to her with a homemade bomb, multiple weapons and ammunition,” the sheriff’s office said.

However, no formal charges were ever filed and the case was later sealed, according to local media.

Colorado has a red flag law that leftists claim will stop mass shootings, yet it failed to prevent the this shooting from happening.

Brandon Drey contributed to this report.

Elon Musk Reveals How He Is Defining ‘Hate Speech’ On Twitter

Twitter CEO Elon Musk said Thursday that he is defining hate speech on the platform based on the definitions that the platform used prior to Musk taking over.

Musk made the revelation in a tweet about how the company has cracked down on hate speech on the platform amid pressure from advertisers and left-wing activists.

“Hate speech impressions down by 1/3 from pre-spike levels,” Musk tweeted. “Congrats to Twitter team!”

“I have half a mind to wag my finger at the 1500 accounts that caused the spike, but I shall forebear,” Musk continued. “Reducing the max allowed tweets/day to a number below what a speed typist on meth could do was helpful.”

Musk then responded to a question from DailyWire+ host Jordan Peterson about how he defines hate speech.

“This is simply based on the same list of terms that Twitter has used for some time, so ceteris paribus,” Musk responded.

This is simply based on the same list of terms that Twitter has used for some time, so ceteris paribus

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 25, 2022

Earlier in the day, Musk announced that he was going to grant a mass amnesty to accounts that had been previously banned on the platform.

Musk made the decision in response to the final results of a poll he tweeted Wednesday. The platform will begin unbanning accounts en masse, except for those who broke the law or engaged in excessive spam, next week, he tweeted in response to the results. Musk has already unbanned a number of popular accounts that were permanently suspended before he took over as “Chief Twit.”

On Wednesday, Musk tweeted a poll asking whether or not to unban users that had been permanently suspended. “Should Twitter offer a general amnesty to suspended accounts, provided that they have not broken the law or engaged in egregious spam?” he wrote.

More than three million users voted in the poll, and the vote was overwhelmingly in favor of amnesty; nearly three-quarters of voters, 72.4%, voted “yes,” while just 27.6% voted “no.”

“The people have spoken,” Musk wrote after the poll concluded. “Amnesty begins next week. Vox Populi, Vox Dei.”

Before the poll ended, Musk seemed to indicate that in effect, the platform would significantly curtail content moderation to target illegal content and increase transparency.

John Rigolizzo contributed this report.