For Grad Students, Labor Day Needs To Be Liberation Day From Radical Campus Union Bosses

While the vast majority of Americans who dwell outside the ivory tower may roll their eyes at the crazed, fanatical politics that have festered at many college campuses across the country, this extremism hits much closer to home for level-headed college students and faculty. Recently, the Trump Administration has been using its control over federal education grants to push back against campus radicalism at some of America’s most elite universities.

Yet still untouched is the massive power that the Obama and Biden Administrations granted to campus union bosses who are frequently at the center of the most extreme and sometimes even violent so-called “activism” taking place at universities. It is time that Trump appointees go to work to fix it.

You see, currently, union bosses on dozens of campuses across the country are exercising government-granted powers that require unwilling graduate students to associate with (and often subsidize) campus unions. College administrators are also forced to “negotiate” with these union officials over campus policies, including discipline for violent campus agitators.

Those unfamiliar with labor law might wonder how union officials obtained such clout on college campuses in the first place – aren’t graduate students students, and not workers on a production line?

It all traces back to controversial rulings by the Obama and Biden National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which handed union bosses the power to obtain monopoly “representation” power over graduate and doctoral students. In states that lack Right to Work protections, that power includes forcing students to pay union dues.

This means union bosses can upend graduate students’ academic careers if they refuse to fund a group whose ideology they find abhorrent, which threatens both academic freedom and religious freedom on campus.

ITHACA, NEW YORK - NOVEMBER 3: People walk through the Cornell University campus on November 3, 2023 in Ithaca, New York. The university canceled classes after one of its students is accused of making violent antisemitic threats. (Photo by Matt Burkhartt/Getty Images)

Matt Burkhartt/Getty Images

Take the case of David Rubinstein, a Ph.D. student in history at Cornell University whose research concerns the postwar Jewish diaspora in Europe. David, who is Jewish, wants as little as possible to do with the Cornell Graduate Student Union (CGSU-UE, an affiliate of the United Electrical union), knowing union officials’ virulent opposition to Israel and affinity for the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement.

But when David exercised his right under federal law and demanded an accommodation to union dues payment based on his religious beliefs, union officials refused. They harassed Rubinstein and other religious objectors with unnecessary and illegal “questionnaires” that demanded they divulge particulars about their religious practice, their faith organizations, and faith leaders. As a result, with free legal aid from the National Right to Work Foundation, David is pursuing a federal civil rights case challenging CGSU-UE’s illegal tactics.

Numerous graduate students at other campuses have similarly needed to take legal action just to get campus union bosses to respect their legal rights. Yet graduate students shouldn’t need to jump through union-created hoops and tangle with union lawyers just to pursue a graduate degree in the first place.

End of Summer Sale – Get 40% off New DailyWire+ Annual Memberships

Fortunately, a more comprehensive solution is on the horizon. Russell Burgett, another Ph.D. student from Cornell, recently launched a groundbreaking NLRB case to strike at the heart of union bosses’ monopoly bargaining powers on campuses. A victory for him would free any dissenting graduate student – whether their opposition is political, religious, financial, or otherwise – from having their academic fates dictated by union apparatchiks.

His Foundation-backed case argues that Obama and Biden NLRB appointees were wrong to “reinterpret” federal law to allow union officials to collectivize graduate students. Nothing in the statute’s plain text suggests that students, whose primary reason for being on campus is to pursue a degree, should be included in the National Labor Relations Act’s definition of “employees.”

If he wins, militant campus union bosses would be stripped of their government-granted powers that let them dragoon unwilling students into their ranks, while also freeing administrators of their current obligation to “negotiate” with union boss radicals over the conditions of all graduate students.

President Trump is currently staffing up his NLRB. He should ensure his appointees get to work quickly on ending the monopoly “representation” and forced-dues powers that previous administrations improperly handed to campus extremists.

* * *

Mark Mix is president of the National Right to Work Foundation.

The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Spin Cycle: Blue State Governors Draw Battle Lines

A growing number of Blue State governors have begun to draw battle lines over President Donald Trump’s use of National Guard troops and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to clean up violent crime — and expedite the deportation of criminal illegals — in major cities all across the country.

For those who don’t spend their Sunday mornings glued to the television — and their Sunday afternoons attempting to dig through a week’s worth of network and cable news media spin — The Daily Wire has compiled a short summary of what you may have missed.

Governor Wes Moore (D-MD) joined host Martha Raddatz on ABC’s “This Week,” and he began by blaming Trump for the animosity between them and claiming that he would “love” help from the Trump administration to clean up his city.

Moore, who just recently claimed that his state was perfectly safe and effectively dared Trump to go for a walk with him to prove it, told Raddatz he would welcome help from Trump to reduce the crime rate in Baltimore “instead of this arrogant criticism and cynicism that he continues to introduce into the conversation.”

Maryland Gov. Wes Moore told @MarthaRaddatz that he would “love” help from President Trump to continue crime reduction efforts in Baltimore “instead of this arrogant criticism and cynicism that he continues to introduce into the conversation.” https://t.co/ck8wwBFBP4 pic.twitter.com/iduozQAoyG

— This Week (@ThisWeekABC) August 31, 2025

Moore continued to buck Trump’s suggestion that the National Guard ought to play a role, arguing that the military should not be utilized in that fashion. Trump has argued that since their deployment in Washington, D.C., has been quite effective, the same should be done in other major cities with similar crime problems.

“As the commander in chief of the Maryland National Guard, I am not just deeply respectful, but very cognizant of the skill sets that our national guards bring. And the National Guard is not trained for municipal policing,” Moore told Raddatz.

“As the commander in chief of the Maryland National Guard, I am not just deeply respectful, but very cognizant of the skill sets that our national guards bring. And the National Guard is not trained for municipal policing,” Gov. Wes Moore said. https://t.co/tvpdB5DCpf pic.twitter.com/Vt3dzrlvyb

— This Week (@ThisWeekABC) August 31, 2025

The Maryland Governor — who has been floated as a potential Democratic presidential candidate in 2028 — went on to defend his criticisms of Trump, arguing that he was only doing it in the service of the people in his state: “I have no interest in fighting with the president, but I have an interest in fighting for my communities and fighting for our people.”

Maryland Gov. Wes Moore defended his rhetoric against Pres. Trump over crime in Baltimore amid their escalating feud: “I have no interest in fighting with the president, but I have an interest in fighting for my communities and fighting for our people.” https://t.co/ePGtbHEyNN pic.twitter.com/CNkY5sihDc

— This Week (@ThisWeekABC) August 31, 2025

On CBS News’ broadcast of “Face the Nation,” Governor JB Pritzker (D-IL) took a remarkably similar posture. While claiming he’d welcome help from the federal government to address violent crime, Pritzker also claimed that his state — even Chicago — was making great progress and said he’d fight back if Trump’s help came in the form of ICE agents or the National Guard.

“They’ll be in court pretty quickly,” he said of the Trump administration.

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker says he hopes the Trump administration doesn’t send National Guard troops, along with ICE and other federal agents, to Chicago in the coming weeks as part of its crackdown on crime, but if it does, “they’ll be in court pretty quickly,” he warns.

“That… pic.twitter.com/BV9AfXkuoa

— Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) August 31, 2025

Pritzker went on to chastise Trump for pointing out the violent crime rampant in Chicago, claiming instead that the biggest crime problems were in red states. What he did not mention was the fact that those cities were almost all controlled by Democratic mayors.

“He wakes up in the morning and whatever whim strikes him is what he apparently says. And recently, I guess, I’ve been living rent-free in his head. Notice he never talks about where the most violent crime is occurring, which is in red states,” Pritzker said.

In response to President Trump calling Chicago “a hellhole” in recent days, Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker says the city “apparently is living rent-free” in the president’s head.

“He wakes up in the morning and whatever whim strikes him is what he apparently says. And recently, I… pic.twitter.com/3qip71RBZU

— Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) August 31, 2025

Pritzker claimed he “would love more help” from the Trump administration, but added, “We don’t want troops on the streets of American cities.”

“He’s taking away federal funding for those programs, which are so important to us. We’ve increased funding at the state level, but we need that federal funding,” Pritzker said.

Illinois “would love more help” from federal agents to fight crime across the state and in the city of Chicago, Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker says. But he pushes back on the Trump administration’s potentially sending National Guard troops to Chicago to assist law enforcement, telling… pic.twitter.com/kGzCMnspPT

— Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) August 31, 2025

He went on to compare Trump to Hitler, explaining, “I built a Holocaust museum. I know what the history was of a constitutional republic being overturned, after an election, in 53 days. And I’m very, very concerned. It’s thwart the media. It’s create mayhem that requires military interdiction. These are things that happen throughout history, and Donald Trump is just following that playbook.”

Gov. JB Pritzker (D-IL) when asked if he believes President Trump is an authoritarian:

“I built a Holocaust museum. I know what the history was of a constitutional republic being overturned, after an election, in 53 days. And I’m very, very concerned,” he says. “It’s thwart the… pic.twitter.com/pCqgYz9oiF

— Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) August 31, 2025

The Illinois Governor — who has also been rumored to have presidential aspirations — then claimed that shootings were also “down significantly” in Chicago before he pivoted to push for even more gun control.

“I very much believe that people who have a right to own a gun should be able to go get one, but that you’ve got to have universal background checks. You’ve got to make sure that you’re not selling guns that give someone the ability to commit a mass attack, in a school or anywhere else,” he said.

Asked how Illinois’ new gun laws will help stop shootings at churches and schools, Gov. JB Pritzker says shootings “are down significantly” in the city of Chicago and across the state.

“I very much believe that people who have a right to own a gun should be able to go get one,… pic.twitter.com/skjNOG0CC1

— Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) August 31, 2025

About Us

Virtus (virtue, valor, excellence, courage, character, and worth)

Vincit (conquers, triumphs, and wins)