California’s hatred for capitalism is killing the goose that laid its golden egg

California didn’t become the world’s fifth-largest economy by accident. Silicon Valley wasn’t built by regulators. Hollywood didn’t turn into a global storytelling powerhouse because of government planning. California was built by entrepreneurs, risk-takers, and innovators who believed in capitalism and the simple American ideology that if you work hard, take risks and build something valuable, you should be rewarded. 

That’s why California’s newly proposed billionaire tax should alarm anyone who still believes capitalism works. This proposal isn’t just another tax hike. It’s a fundamental shift away from the very system that makes Americans prosperous as a nation. 

Under the plan, California would impose a one-time tax on residents with net worths over $1 billion, targeting "wealth" rather than income. That includes unrealized gains which means stock ownership, private company equity and illiquid assets that exist on paper. Wealth isn’t always in checking accounts. Supporters call it fairness, but it’s a tax on success before success is ever realized. 

Here’s the part most politicians ignore. Billionaires don’t necessarily sit on piles of cash. Their wealth is overwhelmingly tied up in businesses, real estate stock holdings and their private companies. When the government demands a massive check based on paper valuations, the only way to pay it is to sell assets.

EXTREME SPORTS STAR LASHES OUT AT NEWSOM FOR KILLING THE CALIFORNIA DREAM: ‘WHAT HAPPENED?’

And that’s where the real damage begins for the people who rely on these billionaires to provide jobs for them to become millionaires. 

If you force someone to sell public stock, the markets can absorb it. But when you force the sale of private company stock, you’re often forcing a founder to sell part of their business or all of it earlier than planned. That can mean selling to private equity, taking on leverage, cutting costs or laying off workers to generate liquidity. 

In other words, a tax aimed at "the rich" doesn’t just hit balance sheets. It hits payrolls.

WASHINGTON POST CITES U-HAUL DATA IN CALIFORNIA EXODUS TO 'PRO-GROWTH' STATES, SAYS 'DECLINE IS A CHOICE'

Capitalism works because it incentivizes innovation and growth. It rewards people for building companies, hiring workers and reinvesting profits. When you start taxing wealth simply for existing rather than income, profits or transactions, you flip that incentive structure upside down. The message becomes clear to entrepreneurs. If you build too much and succeed too much, the government will punish you and possibly dismantle prematurely what you built. 

We’ve already seen how this movie ends for other Californians. 

Take billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, who moved Tesla’s headquarters from California to Texas. Musk didn’t leave because he dislikes sunshine or beaches. He left because regulatory overreach, rising taxes and a growing hostility toward business innovation made it harder to build and scale companies. When the world’s most influential entrepreneur and job creator votes with his feet, policymakers should listen.

CALIFORNIA IS BROKE, BUT IT’S NOT TOO LATE FOR THE REST OF US

He wasn’t alone. Host Joe Rogan moved his podcast empire out of Los Angeles, citing taxes, governance and quality-of-life concerns. Larry Ellison relocated Oracle’s headquarters out of California. Just look at Sergey Brin and Larry Page and their recent moves to sever ties with California. Even liberal Hollywood elites quietly establish residency in Nevada, Texas or Florida, while keeping second homes in Malibu. 

This isn’t coincidence. It’s cause and effect. 

Entrepreneurs don’t just create wealth for themselves. They create jobs, supply chains, tax revenue and philanthropy. When government policies force founders to sell companies prematurely just to pay a wealth tax, it’s workers who pay the price long before billionaires do. 

The danger doesn’t stop at California’s borders. Other blue states are watching closely. If California can tax unrealized wealth, what’s stopping New York, Illinois or Massachusetts from doing the same? Today, it’s billionaires. Tomorrow, its founders worth $100 million. Next, it’s family business owners who spent decades building companies only to be taxed on paper valuations they haven’t monetized.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Supporters argue the tax would only affect a few hundred people. That misses the point. Policies aren’t judged by how many people they hit. They are judged by the incentives they create. 

Capitalism depends on a promise that if you take risks, build something meaningful and create value for others, you can be rewarded with the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.

California once understood that better than almost anywhere else in the world. This billionaire tax suggests the state is forgetting what made it a real Golden State. Since COVID-19, you’ve seen a massive shift of both individuals and businesses, showing that the Golden State may not be so golden anymore. 

The lesson is simple. Money always chases something. When success is treated like a liability, money leaves. And when capitalism is undermined, everyone pays the price and not just the billionaires. 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM TED JENKIN

Meghan Markle shares romantic dancing video with Prince Harry alongside 2016 throwback photo

Meghan Markle shared a romantic new video of herself with her husband Prince Harry along with a throwback photo of the two in 2016 as she celebrated their almost decade-long romance. 

On Saturday, the 44-year-old Duchess of Sussex took part in the viral "2026 is the new 2016" trend, in which social media users are marking the new year with nostalgic photos from ten years ago. 

Markle posted a black and white video from this year in which she was seen dancing with Harry, 41, on a lawn — along with an image of the couple that appeared to be taken during their 2016 trip to Botswana, Africa just weeks after they first met. 

MEGHAN MARKLE ADMITS PRINCE HARRY PROPOSAL NIGHT DISASTER: 5 STANDOUT MOMENTS FROM HER NETFLIX SHOW

"When 2026 feels just like 2016….you had to be there," Markle wrote in the caption, crediting their four-year-old daughter Princess Lilibet with taking the video.

FROM PRINCE ANDREW TO ‘MEGXILE’: THE BIGGEST ROYAL FAMILY BOMBSHELLS OF 2025

In the clip, Markle was clad in a pair of loose-fitting shorts and a short-sleeved white shirt while Harry wore pants and a T-shirt. 

The former "Suits" actress was seen dancing across an expansive lawn toward Harry before the couple embraced and kissed. The couple then began dancing with each other with Harry dipping his wife backward at one point.

The video, which was set to Olivia Dean's 2025 song "So Easy (To Fall in Love)," concluded as Harry picked Markle up and she wrapped her legs around his waist.

APP USERS CLICK HERE TO VIEW POST 

The second slide in Markle's carousel featured a throwback photo of the pair, who were seen beaming as they embraced while standing knee-deep in what appeared to be a waterhole in a savannah. 

During a November 2017 interview with BBC, Harry and Markle recalled that they first met after a mutual friend set them up on a blind date in London in early July 2016. 

The two had an instant connection and quickly followed up their first meeting with two back-to-back dates. Harry remembered that just weeks later, he asked Markle to accompany him on a camping trip in Botswana.

PRINCE HARRY AND MEGHAN MARKLE MAKE FIRST JOINT PUBLIC APPEARANCE SINCE HIS REUNION WITH KING CHARLES 

"I think about three, maybe four weeks later that I managed to persuade her to come and join me in Botswana," he said, via People magazine. "And we – we camped out with each other under the stars, we spent – she came and joined me for five days out there, which was absolutely fantastic."

"Just to take the – take the time to be able to go on long country walks and just talk," Markle added.

Harry noted that it didn't take long for him to realize that Markle was the one.

MEGHAN MARKLE OFFERS RARE GLIMPSE OF 'FAVORITE GUY' PRINCE HARRY IN FATHER'S DAY TRIBUTE

"I fell in love with Meghan so incredibly quickly — it was a confirmation to me that all the stars were aligned," he said. "This beautiful woman literally tripped and fell into my life."

In November 2016, Harry made an official statement confirming their relationship confirming their relationship and pleading for a reprieve from the negative press their romance was receiving.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER

While speaking with the BBC, Markle noted that the pair were able to enjoy their relationship for several months before it was made public. At the time, she was filming her USA Network TV show "Suits" in Toronto, Canada while Harry was living in London. 

"We had a good five, six months almost with just privacy, which was amazing," she said. "I think we were able to really have so much time just to connect and we never went longer than two weeks without seeing each other, even though we were obviously doing a long-distance relationship. So it's – we made it work."

LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS

Markle publicly addressed her romance with Harry for the first time while appearing on the cover of Vanity Fair's October 2017 issue. 

"We’re a couple," she told the outlet. "We’re in love. I’m sure there will be a time when we will have to come forward and present ourselves and have stories to tell, but I hope what people will understand is that this is our time.

The duo announced their engagement in November 2017 and tied the knot in May 2018. Harry and Meghan welcomed their first child, son Prince Archie, now 6, in May 2019. 

Harry and Markle sent shockwaves throughout the world in January 2020,  when they announced that they were stepping down from their roles as senior royals. In August 2020, the pair moved into a $14 million mansion in Montecito, California, where they continue to reside with Archie and Lilibet, who they welcomed in June 2021. 

About Us

Virtus (virtue, valor, excellence, courage, character, and worth)

Vincit (conquers, triumphs, and wins)