Schumer Rejects GOP Proposal To Link Bill Requiring Voters Prove Citizenship With Spending Measure

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) signaled on Sunday that he would not allow the upper chamber to consider a short-term spending measure that is combined with an election integrity bill, setting up a clash with the GOP-led House that has pushed for reforms to shore up security of the voting process with regard to noncitizens.

In a letter to colleagues, Schumer previewed what the Senate will be working on over the next few weeks now that lawmakers are returning to Washington, D.C., following the summer recess, and warned that a government shutdown could happen this fall without Congress reaching a deal for an extension to fund the various federal agencies by the end of September.

“We all know what is at stake: crucial funding for health care, infrastructure, education, food safety, veterans, border security, U.S. competitiveness and more,” Schumer said, adding that Democrats “support” a continuing resolution to keep the government open as long as it does not include any partisan add-ons.

“As I have said before, the only way to get things done is in a bipartisan way,” Schumer said. “Despite Republican bluster, that is how we’ve handled every funding bill in the past, and this time should be no exception. We will not let poison pills or Republican extremism put funding for critical programs at risk.”

Last week, House GOP leaders revealed their version of a continuing resolution, which would provide funding for the federal government through March 28, combined with the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, a bill which aims to require individuals show proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in elections for federal office and pushes states to remove non-citizens from voter rolls.

While at least a couple House Republicans indicated they oppose the latest GOP gambit, Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) — who released a document earlier this year that warned of a National Voter Registration Act “loophole” and cited evidence of noncitizens on voter rolls in various states — said the combination of the continuing resolution and the SAVE Act “has a lot of merit,” a source told The Hill.

Schumer released a joint statement with Senate Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Patty Murray (D-WA) in response to the proposal, declaring, “As we have said repeatedly, avoiding a government shutdown requires bipartisanship, not a bill drawn up by one party. … If Speaker Johnson drives House Republicans down this highly partisan path, the odds of a shutdown go way up.”

The lower chamber already passed the SAVE Act as a standalone bill in July with some bipartisan support. However, the Democrat-controlled Senate has refused to take it up for consideration and the Biden administration signaled its opposition to the election integrity bill. Some critics have argued that the legislation is unnecessary and would create an undue burden on legitimate voters.

Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL), who is running to become leader of the Senate GOP, responded to Schumer’s letter on Sunday by saying the top Democrat “thinks that preventing illegal immigrants from voting is ‘Republican extremism.’ That means that every Democrat supports allowing illegal immigrants to vote. This is insane, a threat to democracy and must be fixed by passing the SAVE Act.”

Axios reported on Sunday that Democrats in Congress and the White House are pushing for a short-term spending measure through mid-December — three months shorter than the House version — to avoid giving Vice President Kamala Harris a “tight deadline” to get the government funded in the first couple months of her first term if she wins the presidential election.

House conservatives, who failed to get border reforms linked to a short-term spending bill earlier this year, have insisted any new continuing resolution should extend into early next year to “ensure Democrats cannot undermine” a prospective second term for former President Donald Trump with a December omnibus. And they said they wanted the SAVE Act attached to it.

‘I Thought That Was Brilliant’: Elton John Is Fine With Trump’s ‘Rocket Man’ Comments

Elton John made it clear during a recent interview that he was not offended in the least when former President Donald Trump sampled one of his songs in devising a nickname for North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un — in fact, he said that he found it “hilarious.”

The musician told Variety that while he was certainly not in agreement with many of Trump’s policies, he knew that the former president was a big fan of his music and had always been friendly with him.

WATCH:

Elton John on his reaction to Donald Trump calling Kim Jong Un “Little Rocket Man”: “I laughed, I thought that was brilliant… I’ve always been friendly toward him, and I thank him for his support. When he did that, I just thought it was hilarious.” https://t.co/QXV9VqAtuT pic.twitter.com/MNhsNzFwlR

— Variety (@Variety) September 7, 2024

During an interview with Variety at the Toronto Film Festival, John was asked what he thought of the fact that Trump had borrowed from his song when he referred to the North Korean dictator as “Little Rocket Man.”

“I laughed, I thought that was brilliant,” John said with a smile. “I just thought, ‘Good on you, Donald.'”

“Donald’s always been a fan of mine, and he’s been to my concerts many, many times,” the singer continued. “So I’ve always been friendly toward him, and I thank him for his support. When he did that, I just thought it was hilarious.”

John had another laugh upon being informed that the North Korean dictator had not understood the moniker at first, prompting Trump to send him an autographed CD.

“Of course he hasn’t heard of me, Kim Jong Un. I’d be very surprised if he had. I’ve never toured North Korea, and I have no intention of doing so,” John added. “But, I thought it was a light moment, and it was fun.”