‘It’s Not Going To Fix Anything’: Black Conservative Debates ‘Artistic Intellectual’ Over Reparations

Actress and comedian Amanda Seales — who described herself as a “radical black woman” and an “artistic intellectual,” among other things — debated 20 black conservatives, and while many made good points, one in particular stood out when he challenged her claim that reparations were both “just and necessary.”

Seales made the assertion on “Surrounded,” a debate series presented by political YouTube channel Jubilee, and the 20 conservatives stepped up one at a time to take the seat opposite her and engage in debate.

The second to sit across from Seales was one of the youngest in the group and he introduces himself as “Matt Nuclear” before stating that he felt privileged to be debating such a beautiful black woman.

WATCH:

“You can give every low-income black American a $50,000 ‘reparations’ check—and it’s not going to fix anything. It’s not going to increase the median household income in ten years.

We had the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882—basically put them under apartheid here in the United… pic.twitter.com/M5TFUny9yP

— Natalie Jean Beisner (@NJBeisner) August 17, 2025

“I disagree that reparations are necessary,” he cut to the chase immediately. “I think the most important thing that’s necessary right now for the black community would be the stopping of violence, especially black on black violence. I don’t see how reparations are going to solve anything.”

Seales dramatically lowered her head, raising a hand to her forehead and sighing loudly.

End of Summer Sale – Get 40% off New DailyWire+ Annual Memberships

“You can give everyone here like a $50,000 check – especially the people that are in the streets who are committing violent crimes consistently — a $50,000 check, it’s not going to fix anything. It’s not going to increase the median household income in ten years by 10% or 20%.”

“For example, we had the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882,” he continued. “We prevented Chinese people from getting citizenship and even entering the country. We discriminated against them and basically put them under apartheid, even here in the United States, yet they have the highest median household income. How is that possible? How come they don’t complain and feel entitled consistently to beg for reparations and beg for this when they are killing each other 90% of the time — which is the rate that black people kill each other, according to the FBI?”

“Oh, young Matt,” Seales did not attempt to hide her exasperation.

“Yet white people are the oppressors,” he interjected.

“I’m not sure where your education came from, but they lied to you,” Seales claimed, despite the Straight Arrow News-provided fact-check attached to the published video that largely verified Nuclear’s statements.

“Stats don’t lie, though,” he protested.

“Statistics lie all the time,” Seales insisted, suggesting that the numbers were being manipulated specifically to keep black Americans oppressed. “So let’s start there.”

She went on to claim that there was no comparison to be made because the Chinese immigrants had come to America of their own volition, and then claimed that efforts were still being made to keep black people from “existing in their true citizenship,” but never explained what that would look like.

When Nuclear pushed back, she interrupted, “Are you acting right now? Do you really believe this?”

When he pointed to decades of FBI data that showed black people were more likely to be killed by other black people than by white people, she laughed at him.

She treated the others who debated her throughout the in similar fashion, repeatedly interrupting and talking over them while demanding that they show her respect and allow her to finish her every point. At one point, she even demanded that Nuclear talk to her like he would talk to his mother.

According to the comments on YouTube, many felt that Seales had been the one not showing respect for the others.

“She insulted almost every one of them and demanded respect for shouting them down each time,” one wrote.

Another added, “‘Are you shaking your head no at me?’ Says the one who literally rolled her eyes at everything they said.”

“The disrespect of this woman is insufferable. Demanding respect while not giving any, rolling her eyes constantly, cutting people off, insulting almost every single one of them and never stating any facts. Every time she said something the SAN fact check proved her wrong. I pray that she doesn’t get into ANY politics again,” another said.

WATCH:

Tulsi Yanks Security Clearances Of 37 Intel Officials Over Russiagate: ‘Abused The Public Trust’

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on Tuesday stripped security clearances from dozens of current and former intelligence officials who “abused the public trust.”

Gabbard announced the move in a post on X, releasing a memo that names 37 current and former intelligence officials, some with ties to an Obama-era intelligence assessment of Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Gabbard, at the direction of President Donald Trump, “directed the revocation of the security clearances of 37 current and former intelligence professionals who have abused the public trust by politicizing and manipulating intelligence, leaking classified intelligence without authorization, and/or committing intentional egregious violations of tradecraft standards,” said Gabbard in a statement.

Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right. Those in the Intelligence Community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the interests of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold. In… pic.twitter.com/23DUNuVAi0

— DNI Tulsi Gabbard (@DNIGabbard) August 19, 2025

The officials who have had their security access yanked include ex-Principal Deputy DNI Stephanie O’Sullivan and Vinh Nguyen. Both O’Sullivan and Nguyen aided former DNI James Clapper in assembling the controversial intelligence assessment that determined that “the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him.”

“The President has directed that, effective immediately, the security clearances of the following 37 individuals are revoked. Their access to classified systems, facilities, materials, and information is to be terminated forthwith. Any contracts or employment with the U.S. Government by these 37 individuals is hereby terminated. Any credentials held by these individuals must be surrendered to the appropriate security officers,” Gabbard’s August 18 memo states.

End of Summer Sale – Get 40% off New DailyWire+ Annual Memberships

Gabbard has released a trove of documents and communications related to the intelligence assessment in recent weeks, increasing scrutiny of former President Barack Obama and his team of intelligence officials.

The assessment was ordered in early December weeks after the 2016 election and concluded in roughly a month, an extraordinary timeline for an assessment that typically should have taken a year or more to investigate and assemble, according to documents released by Gabbard.

Files released by Gabbard show that on December 7, 2016, an intelligence assessment determined that Russia likely did not meaningfully interfere in the 2016 election. The assessment was scrapped the next day “based on new guidance” received by the assessment’s editor.

On December 9, a meeting was called at the White House between Obama and his top national security officials. Afterward, the new assessment was ordered and completed less than a month later.

About Us

Virtus (virtue, valor, excellence, courage, character, and worth)

Vincit (conquers, triumphs, and wins)