Monty Python’s ‘Life of Brian’ Stage Revival Forced To Remove Jokes About Man Who Wants To Be A Woman, Have Babies

In “Monty Python and the Holy Grail,” a filthy peasant who is being throttled by King Arthur at the time, yells: “Come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help! Help! I’m being repressed!”

So it is with another of the British comedy troupe’s movies, “Monty Python’s Life of Brian.”

Comedian John Cleese revealed last week that a scene for his revival of the irreverent stage show, during which “Stan” declares he wants to be a woman named “Loretta” and have babies, is set to be cut from the play — for woke reasons.

“According to Cleese, the ‘Loretta’ scene, in which a male member of the People’s Front of Judea demands his right to have babies, raised eyebrows at a read-through in New York last year,” Spiked reported on Wednesday. “‘We love the script, but you can’t do that stuff about Loretta nowadays,’ the Americans told Cleese.”

The scene is a brilliant bit of surreal comedy in which Stan declares “it’s every man’s right to have babies if he wants them.”

In the scene, Stan and three others do a rat-a-tat-tat exchange that made Monty Python famous. For the record, Cleese plays Reg, Michael Palin is Francis, Sue Jones-Davies plays Judith, and Eric Idle plays Stan. Just enjoy the timing:

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP

Judith: I do feel, Reg, that any anti-imperialist group like ours must reflect such a divergence of interests within its power base.

Reg: Agree. Francis?

Francis: Yeah, I think Judith’s point of view is very valid, Reg. Provided the movement never forgets that it is the unalienable right of every man  —

Stan: Or woman.

Francis: Or woman to rid himself —

Stan: Or herself.

Francis: Or herself.

Reg: Agreed.

Francis: Thank you, brother.

Stan: Or sister.

Francis: Or sister. Where was I?

Reg: I think you finished.

Francis: Oh, all right.

Reg: Furthermore, it is the birthright of every man —

Stan: Or woman.

Reg: Why don’t you shut up about women, Stan, you’re putting us off.

Stan: Women have a perfect right to play a part in our movement, Reg.

Francis: Why you always on about women, Stan?

Stan: I want to be one.

Reg: What?

Stan: I want to be a woman. From now on, I want you all to call me Loretta.

Reg: What?

Stan: It’s my right as a man.

Judith: Why do you want to be Loretta, Stan?

Stan: I want to have babies.

Reg: You want to have babies?!

Stan: It’s every man’s right to have babies if he wants them.

Reg: But you can’t have babies!

Stan: Don’t you oppress me.

Reg: I’m not oppressing you, Stan. You haven’t got a womb. Where’s the fetus going to gestate? You gonna keep it in a box?

Judith: Here, I’ve got an idea. Suppose you agree that he can’t actually have babies not having a womb, which is nobody’s fault, not even the Romans, but that he can have the right to have babies.

Francis: Good idea, Judith. We shall fight the oppressors for your right to have babies, brother — sister. Sorry.

Reg: What’s the point? What’s the point of fighting his right to have babies when he can’t have babies?

Francis: It is symbolic of our struggle against oppression.

Reg: Symbolic of his struggle against reality.

When “Life of Brian” — listed in the IMDB’s top 250 movies — came out in 1979, it faced an onslaught from the Catholic Church. But that might be a simple foe when weighed against the LGBTQ+ community.

Cleese has grumbled before about the plight of the modern comedian. When asked in July of 2022 if they still have the unfettered freedom to be funny, he said, “No. I think it’s particularly worrying at the moment because you can only create in an atmosphere of freedom where you’re not checking everything you say critically before you move on.”

“A lot of comedians now are sitting there and when they think of something, they say something like, ‘Can I get away with it? I don’t think so. So and so got into trouble, and he said that, oh, she said that.’ You see what I mean? And that’s the death of creativity,” Cleese said.

This new onslaught will be tantamount to the Spanish Inquisition. And as the boys of Monty Python have always said: “Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!”

The views expressed in this piece are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Joseph Curl has covered politics for 35 years, including 12 years as White House correspondent for a national newspaper. He was also the a.m. editor of the Drudge Report for four years. Send tips to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and follow him on Twitter @josephcurl.

‘Prioritizing Fairness’: Riley Gaines Praises Cycling Group For Ban On Males Competing In Female Category

Riley Gaines praised the British Cycling organization on Friday after it announced a ban on males competing in the female category, crediting them with “prioritizing fairness.”

The former swimming champion — who was deprived of an NCAA award by male swimmer Lia Thomas — responded to news: “Breaking: British Cycling departs from International Federation rules and limits women’s competitive cycling to the FEMALE SEX ONLY.”

“Great news!” Gaines tweeted on Friday. “Prioritizing fairness as intended to be in sports. Women should never be used as collateral damage to validate feelings/identity of others.”

“It’s time governing bodies of all sports follow [BritishCycling],” she added. Gaines also gave a special nod to three-time Olympian female cyclist Inga Thompson, who recently encouraged women to protest the unfairness of women being forced to compete against males in her sport.

Great news! Prioritizing fairness as intended to be in sports. Women should never be used as collateral damage to validate feelings/identity of others. Its time governing bodies of all sports follow @BritishCycling

Im certain you played a big part in this! @ithompsonfdn ⭐️ https://t.co/3PVua6XYaq

— Riley Gaines (@Riley_Gaines_) May 26, 2023

The governing body announced that the new cycling policy was made to “safeguard the fairness of competition,” The Daily Mail reported.

The change includes making the current men’s category an “open” category where trans-identifying male cyclists can compete against other men, while the female category is just for those who were born female, the outlet noted.

British Cycling Chief Executive Jon Dutton said, “Our new policies are the product of a robust nine-month review process, which we know will have a very real-world impact for our community both now and in the future.”

“I am confident that we have developed policies that both safeguard the fairness of cyclesport competition, whilst ensuring all riders have opportunities to participate,” Dutton added.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP

The review concluded that “even with the suppression of testosterone, trans women who transition post-puberty retain a performance advantage.”

Trans-identifying male cyclist Emily Bridges blasted the new policy, calling it a “violent act.” Bridges was previously set to compete in the female category of the National Omnium Championships. Bridges previously set the national junior men’s record over 25 miles before becoming a part of British Cycling’s Senior Academy in 2019. In 2020, Bridges began identifying as transgender.

The move comes just weeks after trans-identifying male cyclist American Austin Killips won the Tour of the Gila run by the UCI. After the uproar over Killips, the group vowed to review its policy and make a ruling by August, a move many believe will include a ban on males competing in the female category.

About Us

Virtus (virtue, valor, excellence, courage, character, and worth)

Vincit (conquers, triumphs, and wins)