Prince Harry made it clear that he won’t be taking his wife Meghan Markle back to the United Kingdom anytime soon because he said it’s “still dangerous.”

During his appearance on ITV’s documentary “Tabloids on Trial,” the Duke of Sussex said that he’s worried about bringing the Duchess of Sussex or any member of his family to the country without adequate security, People magazine noted.

“It’s still dangerous, and all it takes is one lone actor, one person who reads this stuff to act on what they have read,” Harry said.

“And whether it’s a knife or acid, whatever it is, and these are things that are of genuine concern for me,” he added. “It’s one of the reasons why I won’t bring my wife back to this country.”

Following Prince Harry and Markle’s decision in 2020 to step down from their senior royal roles, RAVEC (a committee made up of the Home Office, Metropolitan Police, and the Royal Household) announced that it had removed the royal family member’s automatic right to taxpayer-funded U.K. police protection.

‘He doesn’t even have to stop for red lights!’

Former Royal Correspondent for The Sun, Charles Rae, says that Prince Harry is being ‘disingenuous’ in his concerns for his safety in the UK, given the security measures he has.

🔓 Become a GB News Member: https://t.co/mNsRsGCG3N pic.twitter.com/dTq47W35hO

— GB News (@GBNEWS) July 26, 2024

In February, the London High Court ruled in favor of the government and found that there had been no “procedural unfairness” in how the Duke of Sussex was being treated — despite his attorney’s argument that Prince Harry still faced security threats, the BBC reported.

Prince Harry had argued that there was unlawfulness in how he was being treated when his security protection was being made on a case-by-case basis rather than automatically being given at the same level he previously had.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP

Though parts of the decision were redacted, the court agreed with RAVEC’s decision, calling it “legally sound” to treat the royal’s protection the same as any other high-profile visitor to the U.K., the outlet noted.

Prince Harry has said he plans to appeal the decision after claiming that he needed the security protection for his kids, Princess Lilibet and Prince Archie, when they are in his native home.

“The U.K. is my home,” the royal previously said. “The U.K. is central to the heritage of my children and a place I want them to feel at home as much as where they live at the moment in the United States.”

“That cannot happen if there is no possibility to keep them safe when they are on U.K. soil,” he added. “I can’t put my wife in danger like that, and given my experiences in life, I’m reluctant to unnecessarily put myself in harm’s way too.”

The Duke of Sussex also offered to cover the costs, but earlier this year, the High Court denied his offer and upheld the decision to downgrade his security, as previously reported.

The Home Office argued that it would be improper for the police to be hired as private security guards, The New York Times noted.

Related: ‘Delinquent’: Prince Harry And Meghan Markle’s Foundation No Longer Allowed To Raise Money

A CBS News journalist praised a Palestinian terror group and came into contact with terrorists while serving as a public official in Gaza, a media watchdog reports.

Marwan al-Ghoul, who has worked with CBS as a producer based in Gaza for more than two decades, spoke at a Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) event back in 2018, according to an investigation by Honest Reporting.

🚨 Exposed: A Gazan Journalist employed by CBS News with deep ties to terrorism.

And yes, we can prove it.@CBSNews should be ashamed. pic.twitter.com/3G7CX8piNc

— HonestReporting (@HonestReporting) July 26, 2024

CBS News producer Marwan Al Ghoul, who has covered the Israeli-Palestinian conflict since 1988 and lives in Gaza, says he hasn’t seen anything like the war between Israel and Hamas: “It’s horrible.”

"This is different, completely different of any other war before in Gaza." pic.twitter.com/D3noKpX2tL

— Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) October 29, 2023

In his remarks, Al-Ghoul praised his relative, a prominent member of the terror group, for “maintaining the noble national values established by the leading martyrs … and those who followed their path of struggle and martyrdom,” the report said.

“The fact that Al-Ghoul was invited to address an official event of the group suggests his (and his family’s) affiliation with it is deep. The effect such an affiliation might have on his ‘journalistic’ work cannot be underestimated,” the investigation stated.

The PFLP is a terror group that has been linked to many acts of violence against Israeli military and civilians, including suicide bombings.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP

Al-Ghoul also reportedly served as a public official, sitting on the Gaza City municipality council, which is controlled by Hamas. As an official, he came into contact with terrorists, according to the investigation.

“What’s clear is that such a public role, in an enclave ruled by terrorists and where terrorists are hosted by the mayor, cannot be done without problematic ties. Especially for a journalist who needs to cover political and civilian issues objectively,” the investigation says.

CBS has relied on Al-Ghoul’s reporting in the months since October 7, when Hamas launched a brutal and deadly surprise attack on Israeli civilians. Since then, Israel has waged a counteroffensive against Hamas in Gaza.

“Israel says that the war is on Hamas,” al-Ghoul said in a CBS interview from January. “But on the ground, it’s completely different. Most of the children or the victims who came to the hospital, I saw them with my eyes, and everyone can see them on TV news, they are children and women.”

Al-Ghoul is just the latest member of the media to be accused of having ties to terrorism. A CNN freelancer also based in Gaza once allegedly served in a Hamas-run body and took a picture of himself with a senior Hamas leader, another investigation by Honest Reporting reported earlier this month.

Legacy media outlets have also been criticized for have a general anti-Israel bias.

CBS News did not immediately respond to a request for comment.