Morning Brief: Trump Eyes Ukraine Peace Deal, Tennessee’s 7th In Focus, & ‘Wicked’ Sweeps Hollywood

President Donald Trump pushes ahead with a potential war-ending deal in Ukraine,  Democrats spend big on a House race in red Tennessee, and Wicked: For Good casts a spell on audiences, leaving some hope for Hollywood after a disastrous year of earnings.

It’s Monday, November 24, 2025, and this is the news you need to know to start your day. Today’s edition of the Morning Wire podcast can be heard below, and the video version can be seen on The Daily Wire:

Trump’s Ukraine Peace Plan

Topline: President Trump is offering Russia and Ukraine a new peace deal, and ramping up pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to sign on.

Peacemaker-in-chief: President Trump has relished his role as peacemaker since regaining the White House, brokering an end to a number of conflicts. But despite his best efforts, the war in Ukraine continues to rage.

But the White House is out with a new 28-point plan that they’re confident will benefit both sides. The plan seems more favorable to Russia, which, from a geopolitical standpoint, makes sense. Regardless of whether they’re the “bad guys,” the reality is they have the upper hand militarily. This is a war of attrition, and Moscow is much better suited to endure.

Right now, DailyWire+ annual memberships are fifty percent off during our Black Friday sale. Join now at dailywire.com/blackfriday.

The White House is urging the Ukrainians and others to be realistic and understand that Putin will not sign onto any deal that leaves him empty-handed, and that means making some painful concessions.

Ukraine’s concessions: Ukraine would be forced to give up on NATO membership and “enshrine in its constitution that it will not join NATO.” It would also bar NATO troops from being stationed in Ukraine in the future and limit the size of Ukraine’s military to 600,000 personnel.

Perhaps most importantly for Zelensky, it would give Russia nearly all of the land it has seized in Eastern Ukraine, and even some it hasn’t. Specifically, it calls for Ukraine to withdraw from the Donetsk Oblast region, a strip of land that was home to a quarter million Ukrainians before the war. That region would be turned into a demilitarized zone to serve as a buffer between the two countries.

All parties involved in the conflict would be granted amnesty under the deal, and the U.S. would begin immediately lifting sanctions on Moscow, bringing them back into the international economy.

Finally, it would require Ukraine to hold nationwide elections within 100 days of signing.

What Ukraine gets: The biggest reward would be an end to the conflict. There’s also a promise to allow them to seek membership in the European Union, and a plan for $100 billion in frozen Russian assets to be invested in a fund to rebuild Ukraine.

As far as security guarantees, one of Zelensky’s main demands, there’s not much beyond vague assurances that Europe and the U.S. would coordinate a military response and reimplement sanctions if Russia were to invade again.

What the U.S. is hearing: Ukraine and the rest of Europe are generally not happy. The headline this weekend on one of Ukraine’s largest newspapers read, “New U.S. peace plan pushes Ukraine toward capitulation.”

Elsewhere, Ukrainian military and political leaders expressed anger that they were not consulted beforehand, accusing Trump of giving Putin his wishlist. In a speech over the weekend, Zelensky seemingly implied that the U.S. had threatened to withdraw support unless they signed onto the agreement, telling his people, “Now, Ukraine may face a very difficult choice: either loss of dignity or the risk of losing a key partner.”

Over the weekend, Zelensky held calls with European allies, including France and the U.K., and they offered a unified front, telling the White House in a joint statement the deal “would leave Ukraine vulnerable to attack” and “requires additional work.”

Tennessee Special Election

Topline: An important special election in Tennessee’s Seventh Congressional District will take place on December 2 to replace former Republican Congressman Mark Green. Democrats are pouring big money into the race, hoping to flip the seat. In 2024, the reliably red district backed Trump with 60% of the vote.

All eyes on TN: This is for a crucial seat in the House, as all seats now are, since the GOP majority is so thin. Also, Tennessee’s 7th Congressional District is important as it represents parts of the Nashville metropolitan area.

Democrats are eager and see it as a pick-up opportunity following off-year election victories in Virginia, New Jersey, and Georgia earlier this month. Politico reports that the Democrats’ House Majority PAC has poured $1 million into advertisements for the race. Cook Political Report ranks the race as “Likely Republican,” but the focus and money has some Republicans a bit nervous.

The Republican: The GOP candidate is Matt Van Epps, the former commissioner of Tennessee’s General Services Department. Van Epps is a West Point graduate and a combat veteran, and he has the crucial endorsement of President Trump.

Morning Wire spoke to Van Epps about his views on Trump’s agenda and how it aligns with his own goals for Tennessee.

I’m an America First conservative. What we’re hearing quite a bit as we’re out across the Tennessee 7th Congressional District is cost of living and working to decrease inflation,” said Van Epps. “We’re working really hard to connect with a lot of folks to address that and put plans in place to do that from housing, energy, keeping taxes low, cutting regulations, health care, [and] child care.”

The Democrat: Most of the attention in this race has focused on the Democrat, state Rep. Aftyn Behn, touted by some Democrats as a rising star and “Tennessee’s AOC.” Behn even had former Vice President Kamala Harris and Rep. Jasmine Crockett campaign for her.

But she’s also caused quite a stir, partly from her social media posts. For example, she has filmed herself openly bragging about trying to bully law enforcement from carrying out its federal operations.

“Wicked: For Good” Saves The Box Office

Topline: In one of the worst years in Hollywood history, one film waved a magic wand this weekend to bring audiences back to theaters. “Wicked: For Good,” the follow-up to last year’s smash hit musical, is shattering records. But is it any good?

The numbers: The numbers are nothing short of dramatic. According to early estimates, “Wicked: For Good” opened globally in the neighborhood of $228 million.

Final numbers are not out yet, but in the domestic market alone, the film is projected to debut at around $151 million, making it the biggest opening ever for a Broadway-musical-inspired feature.

Beyond that, the film had already pulled in the highest earnings this year, around $31 million, in domestic preview screenings. It also had the highest pre-sales for a PG movie ever. It’s definitely on its way to being one of the highest grossing films this year.

The critics: So far, critics aren’t as positive about the sequel as they were about the original. On Metacritic, “Wicked: For Good” has only a 59% positive rating. The first movie averaged 73%. The same story is taking place on Rotten Tomatoes. The first movie was 88% positive. The new release is 70%.

DW’s take: That decrease in enthusiasm isn’t too surprising. The first film largely followed the path of the stage production. Even though Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande’s performances didn’t seem to match the energy and wit that Idina Menzel and Kristin Chenoweth brought to Broadway, powerhouse ballads like “Defying Gravity” (so good Disney ripped it off for “Frozen”) and comical ditties like “Popular” and “Loathing” were still very entertaining.

The problem is the most compelling parts of the musical were covered in the first film.

“Wicked: For Good” is 20 minutes shorter, but feels about an hour longer because there’s simply not a lot of the actual story left to tell. There is a lot of padding to fill out a sequel that could have been wrapped up in 30 minutes. There are some new songs, but they don’t boast either that sly humor or moving poetry of the originals. The performances are, overall, somewhat flat, though Jonathan Bailey as love interest Fiyero is an exception.

While a handful of sequences are impressive, “Wicked: For Good” doesn’t offer the entertainment value of the first entry. But when you’re the only holiday blockbuster extravaganza in town …

Spin Cycle: Democrats Calling For An Insurrection Wasn’t A Problem Until Trump Didn’t Like It

Several elected Democrats got together to make a video last week in which they openly encouraged members of the United States military to take matters into their own hands and subvert their Commander in Chief – but the real problem, as far as legacy media outlets are concerned, is that President Donald Trump didn’t take it quietly.

For those who don’t spend their Sunday mornings glued to the television — and their Sunday afternoons attempting to dig through a week’s worth of network and cable news media spin — The Daily Wire has compiled a short summary of what you may have missed.

The media personalities and members of Congress who appeared across Sunday morning’s political talk shows spent the majority of their time discussing Trump’s reaction to a video that featured Democrats — who had previously served in either the military or the intelligence community — wanting current service members that they could, and should, disobey any order from Trump that was “unlawful.” And although the video was light on specifics, it was heavy on the obvious insinuation that Trump either had or would issue such an order.

Trump’s response to the video was entirely predictable: he lashed out via his Truth Social platform, and the Democrats highlighted his reaction as proof that he might do exactly as they’d warned.

This is really bad, and Dangerous to our Country. Their words cannot be allowed to stand. SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR FROM TRAITORS!!! LOCK THEM UP??? SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!

Sens. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) and Mark Kelly (D-AZ), along with Reps. Chris Deluzio (D-PA), Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA), Maggie Goodlander (D-NH), and Jason Crow (D-CO), appeared in the video — and several of them made the rounds on Sunday morning to talk about Trump’s reaction.

On ABC’s “This Week,” host Martha Raddatz began with the fact that Slotkin had been on the receiving end of death threats — and she immediately interpreted that as a reaction to Trump’s social media posts rather than to Slotkin’s participation in a video that, by multiple accounts, actively encouraged insurrection.

Sen. Elissa Slotkin, who appeared in a video telling veterans and national security specialists to “refuse illegal orders,” responds to President Trump’s social media posts accusing her and others of “seditious behavior, punishable by death.” https://t.co/66zaLl3hl4 pic.twitter.com/Evo4BpF5cE

— This Week (@ThisWeekABC) November 23, 2025

When pressed, Slotkin did ultimately concede that Trump had not given an illegal order that she knew of — yet — but she maintained the warning was justified because the Trump administration’s actions against narco-terrorists had involved some degree of “legal gymnastics.”

Sen. Slotkin tells Martha Raddatz that she is “not aware” of illegal orders made, but says that “there are some legal gymnastics that are going on” in the Trump administration’s recent moves in the Caribbean and Venezuela. https://t.co/0rBn756p75 pic.twitter.com/eJMELd3Cx9

— This Week (@ThisWeekABC) November 23, 2025

Raddatz pointed to a concern voiced by Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who argued that making the video had been unwise: “You owe that to the men and women of the military to be specific about what you’re talking about … What theses senators and House members did was unnerving, and it was unconscionable to suggest that the President of the United States is issuing unlawful orders without giving an example.”

“It makes me incredibly nervous that we’re about to see people in law enforcement … get nervous, get stressed, shoot at American civilians,” Slotkin pushed back.

Sen. Slotkin says her “primary concern” is military use within the United States: “It makes me incredibly nervous that we’re about to see people in law enforcement … get nervous, get stressed, shoot at American civilians.” https://t.co/MFiqhccKmQ pic.twitter.com/5UVWurZgi5

— This Week (@ThisWeekABC) November 23, 2025

Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO), an Army Ranger veteran, also got death threats and blamed President Trump on the CBS News Sunday morning staple “Face the Nation”: “It’s very disturbing stuff. When you have the President of the United States threatening to execute and to hang and to arrest using this rhetoric, people listen to it.”

Rep. Jason Crow says he is taking “seriously” the “very disturbing” death and bomb threats he, his family, and his office have received in the wake of President Trump’s rhetoric over the video to U.S. troops some Democratic lawmakers released.

“It’s very disturbing stuff. When… pic.twitter.com/u42HpdcVTq

— Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) November 23, 2025

Crow defended the video by suggesting that even if an illegal order were to be issued, members of the military might not be ready to defy the Commander in Chief if Democrats did not take decisive action to groom them ahead of time.

“If we wait until the moment that he gives a manifestly unlawful order to a young soldier, then we have failed them. We have to start that conversation now and get people thinking about the distinction, which is what we did,” he explained.

“These, unfortunately, are some of Trump’s core supporters who are rallying behind the president, and they know better,” Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO) says of the video released by House Republicans countering the one released by Democratic lawmakers telling U.S. troops they can refuse… pic.twitter.com/N5y49Ky3BO

— Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) November 23, 2025

Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) ignored the weight of his words — and the words of the others on the video — and claimed that Trump’s words attacking them carried such “weight” that he should hold his tongue.

“His words carry tremendous weight, more so than anybody else in the country, and he should know that,” Kelly said, also suggesting that Trump’s reaction to the video was the main concern.

Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) says President Trump’s rhetoric in response to the Democratic lawmakers’ video to U.S. troops is “very serious,” arguing the president should “understand what political violence is.”

“His words carry tremendous weight, more so than anybody else in the… pic.twitter.com/X3AVXTVvex

— Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) November 23, 2025

Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) also pointed the finger at Trump, saying his words were, “reckless, inappropriate, irresponsible.”

Republican Sen. Rand Paul condemns President Trump’s social media rhetoric over the Democratic lawmakers’ video to U.S. troops, calling it “reckless, inappropriate, irresponsible.”

“It’s not something that is helping the country heal wounds. I think it stirs things up, and… pic.twitter.com/iGN6rs70rU

— Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) November 23, 2025

On NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Kristen Welker pressed Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) — who was not a part of the video — on whether or not she knew of a specific “illegal” order.

Klobuchar’s reply was vague: “If [a National Guard] commander were to tell [troops], hey, go out on the streets and do this and that, that’s not following the order that is in law. So I just use that example.”

Welker: “Do you know what the specific illegal acts are that your Democratic colleagues were referring to?”

Klobuchar: “If [a National Guard] commander were to tell [troops], hey, go out on the streets and do this and that, that’s not following the order that is in law. So I… https://t.co/viCkHoAxMJ pic.twitter.com/Qht2S09sNg

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) November 23, 2025

About Us

Virtus (virtue, valor, excellence, courage, character, and worth)

Vincit (conquers, triumphs, and wins)