“Uncut Gems” actress Julia Fox is facing backlash for her controversial Halloween costume, which social media users are calling “sick and disgusting.”

The 35-year-old celeb, who is an ex-girlfriend of rapper Kanye West, stepped out for a Halloween party in New York City on Thursday and donned an outfit meant to depict the aftermath of the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy. 

Fox was photographed wearing the recognizable pink suit and pillbox hat that JFK’s wife Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis wore on that day. The outfit was splattered with blood meant to represent the assassination.

Reactions on social media were fiercely opposed.

“Julia Fox continues to be one of the most insufferable people imaginable,” one person replied. 

“What a ghoul,” another person echoed.

“You will never be able to convince me that Hollywood is not a product of the devil,” said another.

“Tasteless, narcissistic attention seeking,” another commenter replied.

As backlash mounted, Fox posted a statement on Instagram defending the outfit, insisting her morbid outfit choice was “not a costume” but “a statement.”

“When her husband was assassinated, she refused to change out of her blood-stained clothes, saying, ‘I want them to see what they’ve done,’” the celeb wrote. 

“The image of the delicate pink suit splattered with blood is one of the most haunting juxtapositions in modern history. Beauty and horror. Poise and devastation. Her decision not to change clothes, even after being encouraged to, was an act of extraordinary bravery. It was performance, protest and mourning all at once. A woman weaponizing image and grace to expose brutality. It’s about trauma, power and how femininity itself is a form of resistance. Long live Jackie O.”

Fox is known for getting attention by wearing provocative outfits. In a New York Times essay published last year, the actress said she was sick of pretending to be normal and instead wanted to openly be a “freak.”

“I remember being in fifth grade [on New York’s Upper East Side] and being exhausted from trying to pretend to be normal all the time,” Fox wrote. “It’s not easier [to try] to be normal … eventually freaks are like, ‘I’m going to be myself and live my truth because I can’t pretend anymore.’ Pretending is draining; it’s exhausting; it’s depression. Being a freak’s not an easy thing, but it can be a very beautiful thing.”

The first rule of a Marxist revolution is that it must always eat its own. We’re beginning to see that even before Zohran Mamdani is elected mayor of New York, which has a very high likelihood according to the betting markets.

The supposed heartburn is already setting in because here is the problem: Once people begin to govern, there are actual rules to governance. You have to be a person capable of carrying out the office of the mayor, and there are obstacles to that.

Thus, all of the bizarre, radical signaling that Mamdani has been doing runs up against reality. Make no mistake, Mamdani has embraced Marxism and jihadism. This is a person whose parents are radical; he’s a second-generation radical. His father compared Abraham Lincoln to Adolf Hitler.

Mamdani came to America as one of the privileged scions of an immigrant family. His father is a Columbia University anti-American professor; his mom is an anti-American producer, both of whom believe in a racial hierarchy of victimhood.

POLITICO reported:

Zohran Mamdani and New York City’s Democratic Socialists of America will have some relationship issues to iron out if he’s elected mayor of the nation’s largest metropolis. The DSA has been integral to his success.

The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) is a revolutionary movement. They’re not interested in governance. They’re interested in revolution. They want to overthrow capitalism. They want to overthrow the Constitution. They hate all of these things.

But the problem is that once they get people elected to office, those people have to operate within some boundaries.

More from POLITICO:

How the arrangement will work should Mamdani win on Nov. 4 is uncharted territory. “One of two things will happen: They will give him a grace period and let him get his sea legs and recognize that compromise is a way to get something done, or they become one of his biggest obstacles,” said Christina Greer, an associate professor of political science at Fordham University. “And if that happens, he’ll be fighting people from the right and the left.”

It is clear that that he is going to be moderate in some areas because he doesn’t want to completely destroy all credibility with the New York population; he wants to retain NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch; he’s committed to following through with the city’s plan to build for new jails to replace Rikers, which is something that both he and the DSA had previously opposed.

We’ll see if the DSA will give him any space. My theory is that they will give him some space, that they will allow him to be as revolutionary as he wants to be within the format that has been provided to him, and then they will gradually hollow out the movement.

What the DSA is realizing is something that people from all sides of the political aisle are realizing: If you maintain your extremely radical ground, but you operate within the party system, you’re able to more quickly take power than if you operate outside the party system and browbeat people. Hijacking a party is far easier than forming your own, and then ideologically twisting and turning it.

All this heartburn, this angst, is going to be overplayed.

The hard-leftists know exactly who Mamdani is. They know he’s a revolutionary, and they are perfectly happy to travel with him, knowing that his heart is in the revolutionary place.

Perhaps he ends up stopping short. Maybe they end up turning on him when he’s no longer useful to the movement. Marxist movements have a real habit of doing this.

They will turn on absolute butchers like Leon Trotsky if it turns out that he is now inhibiting the next step of the revolution.

But I think they will give Zohran Mamdani an awful lot of rope with which to hang the city of New York before they make those sorts of moves. The Democratic Party has now built itself around the radicals, which is why you see Ilhan Omar out there as a chief advocate for Mamdani, on the basis that he is being attacked for his Islamic religion, not for the pro-jihadism or the pro-Marxism, or for the fact that he’s never held a real day job and that he’s one of the great leeches on the butt of American society.

The revolution is the only thing that matters here. The truth doesn’t matter. That’s true even for many voters in New York. There’s a brand new poll out, talking about what New Yorkers think is going to happen if Mamdani is elected. The poll shows that many New Yorkers who do not support Mamdani are convinced he’s going to destroy New York. They think that his mayoralty will mark a return to the urban decay of the 1980s, when the city was blighted by poverty, rampant crime, crumbling infrastructure, and abandoned buildings.

It’s not as though New Yorkers are unaware of what’s happening here. New Yorkers are perfectly aware. It’s just that they are willing to risk it. They’re willing to risk it because they want to make a revolutionary statement.

The bottom line is that a plurality of New Yorkers understand things are going to be bad, but they don’t have the strength to stop him. That is the real key to this election.

Many mainstream Democratic figures have swirled and swiveled behind Mamdani and decided that it’s perfectly fine for him to take a leadership position.

This is what happens when the so-called moderates are more invested in the success of the party than they are in the principles of the party. They give way to people who are more interested in shifting and moving the principles of the party than they are in the success of the party.

* * *

Join us now during our exclusive Deal of the Decade. Get everything for $7 a month. Not as fans. As fighters. Go to DailyWire.com/Subscribe to join now.