The terror group Hamas returned what it said were three bodies of hostages to Israel on Sunday.

Hamas militants gave the remains, which it said were the bodies of three Israeli soldiers, over to the Red Cross, which brought them into Israel. The prime minister’s office said that the remains would be taken to the Ministry of Health’s National Center for Forensic Medicine for identification.

“All of the hostages’ families have been updated accordingly, and our hearts are with them in this difficult hour. The effort to return our hostages is ongoing and will not cease until the last hostage is returned,” the prime minister’s office said in a statement. “The public is requested to respect the families’ privacy and to refrain from spreading rumors and unofficial and unverified information.”

The hostage release comes just days after the terror group claimed to have found the remains of three other hostages that it turned over to the Red Cross. Forensic testing conducted on the bodies confirmed that none of the remains belonged to any of the hostages remaining in Gaza, however.

Hamas and Israel struck a ceasefire agreement last month in which Israel agreed to pull back forces from inner Gaza and Hamas agreed to turn over all of its hostages back to Israel, 20 living and 28 dead. While the living were returned, the terror group has returned just 16 of the dead. If the three bodies turned over on Sunday are confirmed, eight more will be left for Hamas to hand over.

Hamas has claimed that it needs time to find the bodies of hostages, which it has said have been buried in some cases below rubble. Drone footage released last week showed Hamas militants burying remains that were soon dug up again and handed over to the Red Cross.

Israel has accused the terror group of being in breach of the ceasefire agreement for failing to return the hostages. Israel has also conducted strikes within Gaza twice since the ceasefire went into place in retaliation for attacks that have killed several Israeli soldiers.

The Trump administration, which mediated the ceasefire and potential peace proposal between Israel and Hamas, has tamped down concerns that the tit-for-tat strikes will threaten the ceasefire.

“The president achieved a historic peace in the Middle East, the ceasefire is holding. That doesn’t mean that there aren’t going to be little skirmishes here and there,” Vice President JD Vance said last week. “We know that Hamas, or somebody else within Gaza, attacked an IDF soldier. We expect the Israelis are going to respond, but I think the president’s peace is going to hold despite it.”

Former Vice President Kamala Harris recalled during a recent interview how then-President Joe Biden had “angered” her in the moments leading up to her one debate with President Donald Trump.

Harris told podcast host Steven Bartlett (“Diary of a CEO”) that Biden had called her prior to the debate, but that instead of giving her the encouragement and advice she expected, he’d made it clear to her that he was thinking only of himself.

WATCH:

Kamala Harris now says Biden angered her and reveals how she “really felt” about the whole situation.

Why is she suddenly speaking up now? 👀

Thoughts? ⬇️ 🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/qe5OxHsbT4

— Tony Lane 🇺🇸 (@TonyLaneNV) October 31, 2025

“I’m in the hotel room with Doug, with my husband, and the president calls,” Harris began. “And I was told that he wanted to call me so that I’d be ready, and I was so sure it was to buck me up and ‘go get him!'”

“He did say that for the first beat. And then he went on to talk about a group of people in Pennsylvania who were saying bad things about me because they heard I was saying bad thing about him,” Harris continued. “And when I hung up the phone, I was just, I was, it was unbelievable! And I was yes, I was angry! And deeply disappointed.”

Join us now during our exclusive Deal of the Decade. Get everything for $7 a month. Not as fans. As fighters. Go to DailyWire.com/Subscribe to join now.

Harris went on to explain that she’d actually wanted Biden to give her some pointers: “It just. It was so unnecessary. There are only two people in the world other than me that has debated this guy, Hillary Clinton and him. And you know what it’s like, it’s … Going into a debate with the stakes being that high and Trump hadn’t agreed to another debate, the stakes were so high. So that’s an example of what I mean.”

“You took something from that. You took an underlying message about one’s intentions from that, because I would,” Bartlett prompted Harris to follow that thought to its logical conclusion. “If someone called me in the lead up to debate prep and said something like that to me, I would assume that they don’t want the best for me.”

“My takeaway is his motivation was all about himself,” Harris replied.

“That’s what I would assume from that,” Bartlett agreed.

“Obviously, right. Yeah. It wasn’t about my performance at the debate,” Harris said.

Bartlett took the argument a bit further, asking, “Do you think he wanted you to win the election?”

Harris said that she did believe Biden wanted her to win, but she thought that his motives had been selfish: “I do because I was the only one who would be able to preserve his legacy.”

“But even that’s about him,” Bartlett noted.

“Well, if I had to assume one of the reasons why he’d want me to win. If– yeah,” she said.