There is some good news out of New York. It’s not a lot of good news out of New York, but it’s some good news.

There’s a brand new poll from Suffolk University showing that in New York, Andrew Cuomo — who is really the only hope of stopping Zohran Mamdani in the New York mayoral race — is catching up to Zohran Mamdani. The poll found that Mamdani no longer leads Cuomo by 20 points or 15 points, but the lead is down to ten, and Mamdani is stuck at 44%.

Typically, when somebody wins the New York mayoral race, they win well over a majority. Here you have Mamdani at 44%. You have Cuomo at 34%, and you have Curtis Sliwa at 11%. There will be a lot of talk if Mamdani ends up mayor about why Curtis Sliwa stayed in the race.

The reality is that Curtis Sliwa is not going to be the next mayor of New York. And if his vote share is larger than the margin of victory for Mamdani, that will leave some questions to be asked. 

  Why is the New York City population so insipid?   Why didn’t Sliwa drop out?

As David Paleologos, director of the Suffolk University Political Research Center, says, Sliwa “is one person in New York City whose voters could have an outsized impact on the outcome.”

This is the first poll since Mayor Eric Adams dropped out of the race.

Most of his support has bled to Cuomo.

Mamdani is running a terrible final week of this campaign. He has decided that his closing message is going to be that New York City is famous for Islamophobia and if you don’t elect him, it’s because you don’t like Muslims, which is a wild statement in a city that suffered 9/11 (where apparently the only victim of 9/11, according to Zohran Mamdani, was his own female relative, who was wearing some sort of hijab on the subway and somebody gave her a mean look).

So now his final closing pitch is, “Why won’t you give me the mayoralty? If you don’t, it’s because you’re mean to Muslims.”

That is the mark of a person who truly feels entitled to everything. If you won’t give him the mayoralty of the financial center of planet Earth, it must not be because he’s a bad candidate, an out-and-out communist, a sympathizer with jihadists, but because you are mean to Muslims.

Lest you truly believe that Mamdani is some sort of soft-hearted, wonderful person, I want to point out a clip of him from 2023. You want to know where his ideology comes from? His ideology is deeply, deeply ensconced in the Red-Green alliance between communists and radical jihadists that is characteristic of so much of the Left these days.

September, 2023.

Zohran Mamdani: “We have to make clear that when the boot of the NYPD is on your neck, it’s been laced by the IDF.” pic.twitter.com/sr8pQyKvCq

— MAZE (@mazemoore) October 28, 2025

Credit: @mazemoore/X.com

That quote from him in September 2023 shows him explaining that basically, his hatred for capitalism springs from his dislike of the “Zionists.”

Mamdani stated:

The importance for me of international solidarity is that it takes me out of the American political landscape and reminds me just how tame some of the things that I’m actually calling for in the next board. And it reminds me of the necessity of grounding ourselves in the struggles as opposed to the fights around the struggles. For anyone to care about these issues … We have to make clear that when the boot of the NYPD is on your neck, it’s been laced by the IDF. We’re in a country where those connections abound. Especially in New York City, you have so many opportunities to make clear the ways in which that struggle over there is tied to capitalist interests over here.

So you see, it’s really the Jews in Israel who are tied to the capitalist interests in New York City. And capitalism, of course, is bad. If you missed it, he said, “When the boot of the NYPD is on your neck, it’s been laced by the IDF.”

This was not 15 years ago. This was two years ago. He was a full grown-ass man when he said this sort of garbage.

But if you point this out, you’re “Islamophobic.”

He only cares about “affordability.” How is he going to deliver affordability? No one knows. But if he just says “affordability” over and over and over, then affordability will magically appear in New York City. It’s like Beetlejuice. If you say affordability three times, then magically all of the rents go down.

He has no idea how he’s going to do anything. But that doesn’t matter. The reason people support Mamdani is because he’s “fetch” and he’s “brat.”

There are a lot of idiots in New York, and those idiots in New York are fully on board with the idea that if you don’t vote for Zohran Mamdani, it must be because you are some sort of racist, or because you hate gay people, or because you are one of those “capitalist tools.”

One can only hope that the non-idiots in New York will show up to vote.

* * *

Join us now during our exclusive Deal of the Decade. Get everything for $7 a month.

Not as fans. As fighters.

Go to DailyWire.com/Subscribe to join now.

Ever since the government shutdown began a month ago, it’s been a challenge to identify anyone in real life — outside of government employees — who has noticed or cared in any meaningful way. Even Democrats don’t seem particularly bothered by the shutdown. They’ve been spending most of their time lately complaining about the renovations that are underway in the East Wing of the White House — which is the kind of thing you complain about when you desperately need to find something to complain about, but you have absolutely no other options whatsoever.

Even if you normally don’t care much about how the government spends your money, this is the kind of development that might make you sit up and take notice. There are road closures and potholes that have probably caused you more inconvenience this month than the shutdown of the entire federal government. And as a result, for millions of Americans, it’s now impossible to ignore the fact that the government you’re forced to pay for — all of the salaries and all of the pensions and so on — doesn’t actually do very much. In the vast majority of cases, the federal government has zero impact on your day-to-day life, or your week-to-week life. They are not “public servants” in the sense that they serve you — in reality, you serve them.

Of course, that’s not to say that your money only goes to federal government bureaucrats. Most of it goes to welfare programs. And it’s the people who receive money from those welfare programs — particularly food stamps, otherwise known as SNAP benefits — who are now speaking up, extremely loudly, to complain about the federal government shutdown. 

Yes, we’ve finally found a large group of people who are legitimately upset about the fact that the government is no longer fully operational. The search is over. 

And these people are upset because, in a matter of days, federal funding for food stamps is going to run out. Watch:

Ohh my god….

Mainstream media CBS reporting 1 in 8 Americans are on SNAP food stamps

That’s 43.1 million people

The working class is paying to provide EBT for 43 MILLION PEOPLE

Approximately 54% of immigrant households participate in at least one major welfare program pic.twitter.com/QeDL4JUMFe

— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) October 27, 2025

Credit: @WallStreetApes/X.com

Notice the flagrant inversion of reality here. If you stop subsidizing someone else’s grocery bill, even for a second, then according to the governor of Massachusetts, you’re “taking away” their food. It’s just like you robbed them. Of course, the actual robbery occurs when you’re forced, against your will, to pay for other people’s groceries every month. That’s the point where the government is taking something away.

But the really striking aspect of that CBS Report was the beginning of the segment, when they casually mentioned that one in eight Americans are on food stamps. That’s roughly 43 million people who are receiving taxpayer money to buy groceries, costing more than $100 billion a year, in a country of 340 million.

In a moment we’ll get into who exactly is receiving this money, and what they’re threatening to do in the next few days. (It’s important information, particularly if you plan on going to a grocery store in the near future without a firearm.) But first, you have to ask yourself: Did you have any idea that 43 million of the 340 million people in this country — again, one in eight — were receiving taxpayer-funded financial assistance to buy groceries?

The sheer scale of this program guarantees that, if we eliminated the food stamp program entirely, then prices at the grocery store would plummet.

This is by far the number-one everyday issue that most Americans care about — the rising price of groceries.

And it has a very obvious solution. When the government spends a massive amount of money subsidizing the purchase of a particular product, in any context, then the price of that product will go up. It was true for college tuition. And it’s true for groceries. The subsidy creates increased demand, but it doesn’t increase the supply. And therefore, the cost goes up, under the basic principle of supply and demand.

Take a look at this data from the Department of Agriculture:

Credit: U.S. Department of Agriculture

Monthly food stamp spending was just $4.5 billion in December of 2019. By December 2022, thanks to a massive expansion by the Biden administration, food stamp spending was $11 billion per month. That’s a lot of new, artificially subsidized demand. And guess what? In that same period, grocery prices went up.

By some estimates, food prices go up by 1% for every 12% increase in food stamp spending. In this case, we’re looking at a percentage increase of nearly 150%. So you can do the math on that. It’s more than a 10% increase in your grocery bill, every single month. This means that if you’re a working American and you aren’t on food stamps, you are actually paying — against your will — for other people’s groceries twice. You’re paying when the government takes the money out of your paycheck. You’re paying again every time you buy groceries for yourself.

So who exactly is benefiting from food stamps? And how much of this spending is actually necessary?

Put another way: How many people would starve to death, on the streets, if food stamps were abolished?

We all know that number is much, much less than the total number of food stamp recipients in this country. But how much lower is it? 90%? 100%? If food stamps were abolished tomorrow, how many people, exactly, would end up lying on the sidewalk, rib cages protruding, starving to death? Of the 40 million people on food stamps, how many actually depend on it to live?

These are questions we should probably answer, now that we know the enormous cost of these programs, thanks to the government shutdown. And while we’re at it, we should answer this question: Has anyone ever starved to death in the modern history of this country because they haven’t had access to food? Has a single sane person, through no fault of his own, shriveled and died because he couldn’t afford to buy anything to eat? Has there been a single example of someone with no family, no friends, no other forms of state or federal welfare he can tap into, no food banks or churches he can visit, no panhandling he can perform, no job, no soup kitchens nearby, no charity food drives in his area, nothing at all?

If something like that were ever to happen in the United States, then I’d be the first in line to say, get that person a taxpayer-funded hotdog. But I don’t actually think that’s ever happened in my lifetime. And no one has demonstrated to me otherwise. In fact, if you look at what food stamp recipients are saying — in their own words — you come away with the distinct impression that none of these people actually need food stamps. Instead, you come away with the impression that many of these people are simply entitled, lazy, barely literate, and frankly just very bad people. I’m not saying that describes every adult on food stamps, but it does seem to describe a lot of them. People who, rather than get a job, would prefer to rob grocery stores (and the people shopping inside them).

Here’s just a sampling of the response from food stamp recipients on TikTok. Watch:

Credit to multiple sources: (@AmiriKing/X.com, @iAnonPatriot/X.com, @smcroasters/X.com, @ImMeme0/X.com, @not_rekt_11/X.com, @AmiriKing/X.com)

Among other things, if you are going to shop for groceries during this government shutdown, you have to keep these videos in mind. There are many, many threats like this. Many people receiving food stamps would rather rob you — and even kill you and eat you, apparently — than have to pay for their own groceries, for once in their lives.

I’ll highlight a couple more of these clips, mainly because they’re so over-the-top that it’s hard to believe they’re real.

But they are. Watch:

EBT recipient says that she’ll be going to jail for a THIRD time, if she doesn’t get her food stamps in November..

👀 pic.twitter.com/0bnkrjD4V3

— American AF 🇺🇸 (@iAnonPatriot) October 27, 2025

Credit: @iAnonPatriot/X.com

As best I could decipher, this individual — who doesn’t appear to be an American — is threatening to go to prison for the third time, if her — or maybe his, I can’t tell — food stamps don’t come through in November. And for good measure, you can hear a smoke alarm chirp, mid-rant. In case you missed it, it went like this: “I don’t gibba fugg, i’m not in da mood, my birthday in decembah,” then there’s the chirp, and then there’s the statement that, “thanksgibbin comin’ up.”

You are actively suffering, money is being taken out of your paycheck, and food off of your children’s plate, for the sake of this person. Remember that.

One question, right off the bat, is why someone who’s been to prison is allowed to receive food stamps in the first place. Why is this something we’re tolerating? You can commit multiple crimes, resulting in your incarceration, and then when you get out, you can force taxpayers to buy your groceries? That seems like a privilege we should rescind, immediately.

And while we’re at it, we should implement drug testing as a requirement for SNAP benefits, as this video makes clear. Watch:

 

Credit: @iAnonPatriot/X.com

Can you imagine the horror of having to tap into your weed budget to buy food? It’s just unthinkable, really. No one should have to endure a humiliation like that. Surely, we should just steal the money from people who are actually working for a living. You can look at the saddest of sob stories, and it doesn’t get any better.

Here’s a report, for example, that aired on a local Fox affiliate this week. Watch:

“I would’ve never thought in a million years that I would’ve been in this position—to have to go to a food bank.”

“I don’t want my daughter to see me crying.”

Democrats have cut off our workers’ paychecks to try to get free healthcare for illegals. It’s disgusting. pic.twitter.com/secqt81bkE

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) October 27, 2025

Credit: @RapidResponse47/X.com

So we’re supposed to feel really sorry for Denise, a federal worker at the Department of Defense. She had to go to a food bank, and barely got any food, all because of the government shutdown.

If you look up Denise online, you find that she’s drawn a taxpayer-funded salary since 2015. Her lowest salary was more than $60,000 a year. Last year, Denise made more than $87,000. That’s a decade’s worth of income — and each year, she earned well above the median personal income in this country. She presumably has access to a credit card, given this income. To put this into further perspective, when I first got married, my salary was a quarter of Denise’s. I earned in a year what Denise makes in about four months. And I was never even close to starving. And I wasn’t on food stamps.

There is no conceivable way that Denise is going to starve to death, either. Even if she’s been financially reckless to the point of comic-book level absurdity, she doesn’t need handouts to buy food. She can put it on credit, or tap into her savings account (which she should have been growing for many years). To be clear, I’m not saying she’s going to live a life of luxury. I’m not saying this won’t be stressful. I’m not even faulting her for trying to find free food. But I am saying that taxpayers have no obligation, in any universe, to buy her groceries. We’ve already been paying her bills for a decade and frankly, if we’re being honest, she probably wasn’t doing anything for those ten years anyway.

But Denise, for all I’ve dumped on her, is ten thousand times more sympathetic than other alleged “victims” of this government shutdown.

For example, this is a real video that was posted by Senator Amy Klobuchar, after recent testimony in Congress.

Here’s the caption that the senator posted.

Today, we heard from Felecia, a single mom of four who works up to three jobs at a time to make ends meet. She counts on SNAP to help put food on the table. This is who Republicans in Congress are trying to take food away from. Listen to her story.

So here it is. This is Felecia, who drives students for the school district. Let’s listen to her story:

Today, we heard from Felecia, a single mom of four who works up to three jobs at a time to make ends meet. She counts on SNAP to help put food on the table.

This is who Republicans in Congress are trying to take food away from.

Listen to her story. pic.twitter.com/jEBo2fRPQc

— Amy Klobuchar (@amyklobuchar) June 12, 2025

Credit: @amyklobuchar/X.com

Let’s just say that this woman could survive for a very, very long time without food. This woman is well over 300 pounds, probably pushing 400. It is the height of absurdity for a U.S. senator to present this woman as someone who urgently needs taxpayers to fund her grocery bill. She can clearly afford major cutbacks to her food spending. Not only that — it would clearly be beneficial to her health. It would be the humane thing to do, to force this woman to think before she spends money on muffins, soda, candy, various slabs of meat and so on.

Again, this is the most sympathetic witness that Democrats could find.

It only gets worse from here. 

Illegal aliens are some of the main recipients of food stamps for example. Here’s a recent admission from the administration of Maine Governor Janet Mills.

Credit: State of Maine, Department of Health and Human Services

In case you can’t make it out, Janet Mills acknowledges in this document that Maine provides SNAP benefits to non-citizens, including 5,000 non-citizens with EBT cards who don’t have jobs, even though they’re eligible to work.

And EBT cards are very valuable, as you might imagine.

An lIIegaI alien in Chicago, Illinois USA still has $7,612 left on his “refugee” EBT card. The original amount was $10,800.00. pic.twitter.com/vPRinXG2qE

— Dane (@UltraDane) May 3, 2025

Credit: @UltraDane/X.com

An illegal in the US reportedly left behind a receipt showing over $13K EBT Food Stamp balance and over $4K EBT Cash balance pic.twitter.com/NGd2ybMYJX

— Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 (@Bubblebathgirl) August 3, 2024

Credit: @Bubblebathgirl/X.com

Some states print your total EBT balance on the receipt. And as you can see, there are people with EBT balances of over $10,000 in some cases. It’s clearly in excess of what any reasonable person would need for groceries. Watch:

🚨 Grocery store worker in Springfield, Ohio says that Haitian migrants have EBT cards with $13,000 for food and $29,000 for cash.

Can you believe this?

👀🔉 pic.twitter.com/PkbopVrThN

— AmericanPapaBear™ (@AmericaPapaBear) September 26, 2024

Credit: @AmericaPapaBear/X.com

It is a serious problem, and it gets worse when you realize how many illegal aliens are taking advantage of the system. It’s not just 5,000 people in Maine.

This is from the Economic Policy Innovation Center:

The Food Stamp program provided benefits to 1.4 million noncitizens in fiscal year 2022, the latest data available from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Another 2.2 million children living with noncitizens were also on Food Stamps. … California led the way in enrolling noncitizens on Food Stamps, with 273,000 in Fiscal Years 2022.

So there’s a clear incentive here for illegal aliens to have children — not simply so that those children can be citizens, but also so that they can collect food stamps. That may be part of the reason why, according to the Center for Immigration Studies:

Compared to households headed by the U.S.-born, immigrant-headed households have especially high use of food programs (36 percent vs. 25 percent for the U.S.-born).

Additionally, “Food stamp use by Afghan households increased the most, from 19 percent to 35 percent between 2010 and 2019, while falling from 11 percent to 10 percent for native-born households.”

Yes, 35% of Afghan households were on food stamps. A typical family of four will receive around $800 in monthly assistance, which is more than many American families spend.

This isn’t just wasteful spending. This is a direct attack on you and your family. You are being robbed at gunpoint by the state and forced to subsidize foreigners. We are inviting people to come to this country and live off of the labor of its citizens. Words cannot describe how evil this is.

I’ve long said that government shutdowns serve no purpose — that they inevitably get resolved, with no meaningful interruption or changes to anyone’s life — but this particular shutdown presents a clear opportunity for a different result. This time around, it’s extremely easy to see how much overt waste and corruption is inherent in the SNAP system, largely because the people receiving these benefits can’t stop posting on TikTok. They’re revealing — inadvertently — that they don’t actually need the money. They’re telling us that they don’t need the money in about a dozen different ways — by making threats, by highlighting the testimony of morbidly obese women, by admitting that they’re handing the cash to illegal aliens, and so on.

So let’s listen to these people, for once. Let’s abolish the SNAP program altogether. Let’s make this government shutdown the first shutdown in the history of this country that’s actually been productive. No one will starve as a result. But a few million people, against their will, might have to learn the all-important twin concepts of budgeting and dieting. And if that happens — which it will, if SNAP is abolished — we’ll all be much better off as a result.