The American Medical Association (AMA) — which wields major influence as the nation’s largest medical association — has reversed course on its position concerning transgender surgical procedures for minors.

In a statement to National Review, the AMA said “the evidence for gender-affirming surgical intervention in minors is insufficient for us to make a definitive statement,” adding that it “agrees” with the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) “that surgical interventions in minors should be generally deferred to adulthood.”

The AMA added that it supports “evidence-based treatment,” including other types of so-called gender-affirming care for minors.

As highlighted by The Daily Wire, ASPS released a statement on Tuesday that said available evidence does not support genital procedures or removing the breasts of young girls who identify as boys. The ASPS also said there was “insufficient” support for placing kids on puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones.

The pivot from the AMA is particularly stark, since the association has gone all-in on transgender procedures for minors even in the face of mounting evidence that such action is harmful and often irreversible.

Also, the timing of the change is incredibly notable. Just last week, a young woman was awarded a $2 million judgment in her lawsuit against the medical professionals who advanced and performed the removal of her healthy breasts at just 16 years old as part of transgender “treatment” for the teen, who at the time was suffering from a series of mental health issues.

Mere months ago, the AMA reaffirmed its commitment to transgender procedures for minors in the wake of the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. Skrmetti, which effectively allowed states to ban such surgeries. 

“The American Medical Association is disappointed in today’s decision that opens the door to further intrusion into patient care and harmful government interference into the practice of medicine,” AMA President Dr. Bobby Mukkamala said in a statement after the ruling came down.

Moreover, in video footage published by The Ben Shapiro Show, Mukkamala makes wild remarks about the benefits of transgender procedures for minors, such as claiming puberty blockers are reversible and citing other questionable statistics about transgender regret and suicide rates, The Daily Wire reported.

Additionally, in 2023, the AMA passed a resolution that committed to “opposing any criminal and legal penalties against patients seeking gender-affirming care, family members or guardians who support them in seeking medical care, and health care facilities and clinicians who provide gender-affirming care.”

The association also vowed to “work at the federal and state level with legislators and regulators to oppose such policies and collaborate with other organizations to educate the Federation of State Medical Boards about the importance of gender-affirming care.”

Related: Shocking Details Emerge In Landmark $2 Million ‘Trans’ Malpractice Judgment

Hundreds of thousands of Canadians could face prison time if they do not turn in their newly prohibited guns under a supposedly “voluntary” gun buyback program that is testing the strength of Canada’s bureaucratic regime.

Since May 2020, the Canadian government has attempted to institute a massive “assault-style firearms compensation program” that will purportedly trade cash for prohibited guns. If Canadians do not turn in a prohibited gun by October 2026, they could face up to five years in prison. The program has faced massive pushback from provincial leaders and gun rights organizations who say it will only disarm law-abiding Canadians.

Cathie Coward/Toronto Star via Getty Images

“We’re finding that they’re running into a lot of compliance issues,” Blair Hagen, an executive at Canada’s National Firearms Association, told The Daily Wire. “They have no idea where [the guns are] or who has them. So it’s proving to be a very, very difficult situation for the government.”

Due to the scope of the program, the government has extended amnesty three times for ownership of one of the thousands of banned so-called “assault-style” guns, with the latest one set to expire in October 2026.

We Can Thank Justin Trudeau

David Kawai/Bloomberg via Getty Images

An order in council rolled out by then Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in May 2020 banned thousands of “assault weapons” and claimed to offer compensation to those who voluntarily turn in their weapons. According to Hagen, an order in council is a “non-democratic legal instrument” where the Canadian government can ban items like guns “without having to take legislation through parliament.”

Today, the government describes participation in the gun buyback program as “voluntary” but that compliance with the gun ban is required.

“While participating in the program is voluntary, compliance with the law is not. Businesses and individual firearm owners must safely dispose of or permanently deactivate their assault-style firearms before the amnesty period ends on October 30, 2026, or risk criminal liability for the illegal possession of a prohibited firearm,” the government says on its website.

Justin Davis, the public affairs director of the National Rifle Association, said that it made no sense to call the program voluntary.

“I mean, they call these things voluntary, but if the option is either turn them in or you’re going to jail, I would not consider that voluntary,” he told The Daily Wire. 

The government also doesn’t guarantee compensation for turning in the designated weapons, only saying that gun owners “who choose to participate in the program may receive compensation subject to availability of program funds.”

Carney Calls It Compensation, Not Confiscation

James Park/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Prime Minister Mark Carney claims that the program, which could penalize gun owners with jail time if they don’t comply, was not “confiscation.”

“This is not about confiscation. This is about voluntary return of firearms for compensation,” Carney said during a podcast in September 2025. “People aren’t going around confiscating guns. Anyone who says that, that is a mischaracterization, what it is is an opportunity for Canadians to return guns for compensation.”

In the same podcast, Carney claimed that the hunting rifles would not be impacted by the extensive gun ban.

“We are not talking about hunting rifles. We’re not talking sports shooting or anything like that. We’re talking about assault rifles,” Carney said.

However, this appears to ignore the fact that there is a specific carve-out for Native tribes that use prohibited rifles for hunting. The amnesty includes “a temporary exception for Indigenous peoples’ exercising a right” under the Constitution and “as well as those who use firearms for sustenance hunting, which enables them to continue to use their newly prohibited firearms to hunt (if previously non-restricted) until a suitable replacement can be found.”

Not In Alberta

Leah Hennel/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Many Canadian provinces, including Yukon, Alberta, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Saskatchewan, and Ontario, have indicated they will not assist the national government in enforcing the ban.

“We will have nothing to do with this program. We will not spend any Alberta taxpayer dollars on this program,” Teri Bryant, the chief firearms officer of Alberta, told CBC News last month. “We can’t block the federal government from setting something up, but they have to set it up and be appropriately licensed.”

Effectively, what this means is that the feds will be on their own for enforcing the gun ban throughout much of Canada without any assistance from local law enforcement.

“If the feds want to try and enforce it, they are going to have to do it themselves, and of course, the logistics get even more insurmountable and the price goes up,” Hagen said.

In the fall of 2025, the Canadian government ran a pilot program of the buyback scheme that ran for six weeks and only yielded 25 guns. The government had reportedly expected to confiscate some 200 weapons.

The government declared the program a success, saying that it showed that “factual, consistent information on how the program works, what individuals can expect if they choose to participate, and legal requirements to comply with the prohibition must be readily available and up-to-date.”

Hagen said that there was not much public appetite for the gun buyback program, but that it was pushed by leftists embedded in Canada’s federal bureaucracy. 

“That’s one of the biggest problems with firearms laws in Canada,” he said. “There is a civil disarmament agenda in that bureaucracy. It started many years ago. They’ve done everything they can to ensure that it continues.”

At the end of the day, Hagen sees the government’s efforts to stop crime and violence by taking law-abiding citizens’ firearms as illogical.

“You can put all the laws and restrictions and prohibitions on the lawful acquisition and ownership of firearms that you want, but it’s not going to decrease or eliminate crime or tragedies because criminals and lunatics will always find a way,” he said.

American Leftists Want The Same Policy

That sentiment was echoed by Davis with the NRA, who warned that leftist politicians in the United States wanted to enact similar policies.

“The issue here is the idea that criminals would be turning in their firearms is just absolutely illogical,” he told The Daily Wire. “There’s no criminal in the world who’s going to turn in their firearm for a few dollars when instead they can use it for perpetuating crime.”

During her first run for president back in 2019, Kamala Harris said she supported a “mandatory” gun buyback program for so-called “assault weapons.”

“We have to have a buyback program, and I support a mandatory gun buyback program,” Harris said. “It’s got to be smart, we got to do it the right way.”

SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images

Davis said that the Second Amendment gave a layer of protection to gun owners that those in Europe and Canada didn’t have.

“Places like Europe and Canada and Australia do not have those type of protections, and you see political figures continue to push more and more gun control laws that, again, just disarm law abiding citizens and create more soft targets for criminals, and evil individuals in this world who want to do harm to innocent lives,” he said.

A 2024 challenge to Canada’s buyback program lost, but advocates for gun rights in Canada believe that the program will become too expensive to institute and will face a host of practical problems.

Hagen sees some parallels between the current ban on “assault-style” weapons and the effort to have all long guns registered. That requirement was repealed in 2012 by a Conservative coalition and was seen as a major victory for Canadian gun rights advocates. The policies could also be overturned if Carney’s Liberal Party loses power in Canada.

“It’s one thing to ban a bunch of guns and declare that they’re prohibited and state your intention to confiscate them,” Hagen said. “But it’s quite another to actually make that happen.”